A discrete-choice experiment to assess treatment modality preferences of patients with anxiety disorder

Joran Lokkerbol, Julia M. van Voorthuijsen, Amber Geomini, Bea Tiemens, Annemieke van Straten, Filip Smit, Anneriek Risseeuw, Anton van Balkom, Mickaël Hiligsmann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Aims: The aim of this study was to elicit the preference of patients with an anxiety disorder regarding treatment modalities. Understanding patients’ preferences could help optimize treatment uptake and adherence to therapeutic interventions. Materials and methods: A discrete-choice experiment was used to elicit patients’ preferences with regard to four treatment characteristics: waiting time until first treatment, intensity of treatment, face-to-face vs digital treatment, and group size. In 12 choice sets, participants were asked to choose between two treatment alternatives. A random parameters logit model was used to analyse the data. Results: A total of 126 participants, aged 18 years and older, currently or in the previous year in treatment for an anxiety disorder, completed the survey. Respondents preferred short (over long) waiting times, face-to-face (over digital) treatment, individual (over group) treatment and a treatment intensity of one session per week rather than two sessions per week or one session every two weeks. Waiting time and treatment intensity were substantially less important to patients than level of digitalization and group size. Heterogeneity in preference was significant for each attribute, and sub-group analyses revealed this was partly related to education level and age. Limitations: The convenience sample over-represented the female and younger population, limiting generalizability. Limited information on background characteristics limited the possibilities to explore preference heterogeneity. Conclusions: This study demonstrated how different treatment components for anxiety disorders affect patients’ preferences for those treatments. There is significant variation in treatment preferences, even after accounting for age and education. Incorporating patients’ preferences into treatment decisions could potentially lead to improved adherence of treatments for anxiety disorders.
LanguageEnglish
Pages169-177
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Medical Economics
Volume22
Issue number2
Early online date2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2019

Cite this

Lokkerbol, J., van Voorthuijsen, J. M., Geomini, A., Tiemens, B., van Straten, A., Smit, F., ... Hiligsmann, M. (2019). A discrete-choice experiment to assess treatment modality preferences of patients with anxiety disorder. Journal of Medical Economics, 22(2), 169-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2018.1555403
Lokkerbol, Joran ; van Voorthuijsen, Julia M. ; Geomini, Amber ; Tiemens, Bea ; van Straten, Annemieke ; Smit, Filip ; Risseeuw, Anneriek ; van Balkom, Anton ; Hiligsmann, Mickaël. / A discrete-choice experiment to assess treatment modality preferences of patients with anxiety disorder. In: Journal of Medical Economics. 2019 ; Vol. 22, No. 2. pp. 169-177.
@article{6d475d77a58a49d28fbb26be274fae52,
title = "A discrete-choice experiment to assess treatment modality preferences of patients with anxiety disorder",
abstract = "Aims: The aim of this study was to elicit the preference of patients with an anxiety disorder regarding treatment modalities. Understanding patients’ preferences could help optimize treatment uptake and adherence to therapeutic interventions. Materials and methods: A discrete-choice experiment was used to elicit patients’ preferences with regard to four treatment characteristics: waiting time until first treatment, intensity of treatment, face-to-face vs digital treatment, and group size. In 12 choice sets, participants were asked to choose between two treatment alternatives. A random parameters logit model was used to analyse the data. Results: A total of 126 participants, aged 18 years and older, currently or in the previous year in treatment for an anxiety disorder, completed the survey. Respondents preferred short (over long) waiting times, face-to-face (over digital) treatment, individual (over group) treatment and a treatment intensity of one session per week rather than two sessions per week or one session every two weeks. Waiting time and treatment intensity were substantially less important to patients than level of digitalization and group size. Heterogeneity in preference was significant for each attribute, and sub-group analyses revealed this was partly related to education level and age. Limitations: The convenience sample over-represented the female and younger population, limiting generalizability. Limited information on background characteristics limited the possibilities to explore preference heterogeneity. Conclusions: This study demonstrated how different treatment components for anxiety disorders affect patients’ preferences for those treatments. There is significant variation in treatment preferences, even after accounting for age and education. Incorporating patients’ preferences into treatment decisions could potentially lead to improved adherence of treatments for anxiety disorders.",
author = "Joran Lokkerbol and {van Voorthuijsen}, {Julia M.} and Amber Geomini and Bea Tiemens and {van Straten}, Annemieke and Filip Smit and Anneriek Risseeuw and {van Balkom}, Anton and Micka{\"e}l Hiligsmann",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/13696998.2018.1555403",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "169--177",
journal = "Journal of Medical Economics",
issn = "1369-6998",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

Lokkerbol, J, van Voorthuijsen, JM, Geomini, A, Tiemens, B, van Straten, A, Smit, F, Risseeuw, A, van Balkom, A & Hiligsmann, M 2019, 'A discrete-choice experiment to assess treatment modality preferences of patients with anxiety disorder', Journal of Medical Economics, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 169-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2018.1555403

A discrete-choice experiment to assess treatment modality preferences of patients with anxiety disorder. / Lokkerbol, Joran; van Voorthuijsen, Julia M.; Geomini, Amber; Tiemens, Bea; van Straten, Annemieke; Smit, Filip; Risseeuw, Anneriek; van Balkom, Anton; Hiligsmann, Mickaël.

In: Journal of Medical Economics, Vol. 22, No. 2, 01.02.2019, p. 169-177.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A discrete-choice experiment to assess treatment modality preferences of patients with anxiety disorder

AU - Lokkerbol, Joran

AU - van Voorthuijsen, Julia M.

AU - Geomini, Amber

AU - Tiemens, Bea

AU - van Straten, Annemieke

AU - Smit, Filip

AU - Risseeuw, Anneriek

AU - van Balkom, Anton

AU - Hiligsmann, Mickaël

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - Aims: The aim of this study was to elicit the preference of patients with an anxiety disorder regarding treatment modalities. Understanding patients’ preferences could help optimize treatment uptake and adherence to therapeutic interventions. Materials and methods: A discrete-choice experiment was used to elicit patients’ preferences with regard to four treatment characteristics: waiting time until first treatment, intensity of treatment, face-to-face vs digital treatment, and group size. In 12 choice sets, participants were asked to choose between two treatment alternatives. A random parameters logit model was used to analyse the data. Results: A total of 126 participants, aged 18 years and older, currently or in the previous year in treatment for an anxiety disorder, completed the survey. Respondents preferred short (over long) waiting times, face-to-face (over digital) treatment, individual (over group) treatment and a treatment intensity of one session per week rather than two sessions per week or one session every two weeks. Waiting time and treatment intensity were substantially less important to patients than level of digitalization and group size. Heterogeneity in preference was significant for each attribute, and sub-group analyses revealed this was partly related to education level and age. Limitations: The convenience sample over-represented the female and younger population, limiting generalizability. Limited information on background characteristics limited the possibilities to explore preference heterogeneity. Conclusions: This study demonstrated how different treatment components for anxiety disorders affect patients’ preferences for those treatments. There is significant variation in treatment preferences, even after accounting for age and education. Incorporating patients’ preferences into treatment decisions could potentially lead to improved adherence of treatments for anxiety disorders.

AB - Aims: The aim of this study was to elicit the preference of patients with an anxiety disorder regarding treatment modalities. Understanding patients’ preferences could help optimize treatment uptake and adherence to therapeutic interventions. Materials and methods: A discrete-choice experiment was used to elicit patients’ preferences with regard to four treatment characteristics: waiting time until first treatment, intensity of treatment, face-to-face vs digital treatment, and group size. In 12 choice sets, participants were asked to choose between two treatment alternatives. A random parameters logit model was used to analyse the data. Results: A total of 126 participants, aged 18 years and older, currently or in the previous year in treatment for an anxiety disorder, completed the survey. Respondents preferred short (over long) waiting times, face-to-face (over digital) treatment, individual (over group) treatment and a treatment intensity of one session per week rather than two sessions per week or one session every two weeks. Waiting time and treatment intensity were substantially less important to patients than level of digitalization and group size. Heterogeneity in preference was significant for each attribute, and sub-group analyses revealed this was partly related to education level and age. Limitations: The convenience sample over-represented the female and younger population, limiting generalizability. Limited information on background characteristics limited the possibilities to explore preference heterogeneity. Conclusions: This study demonstrated how different treatment components for anxiety disorders affect patients’ preferences for those treatments. There is significant variation in treatment preferences, even after accounting for age and education. Incorporating patients’ preferences into treatment decisions could potentially lead to improved adherence of treatments for anxiety disorders.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85059014006&origin=inward

UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30501135

U2 - 10.1080/13696998.2018.1555403

DO - 10.1080/13696998.2018.1555403

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 169

EP - 177

JO - Journal of Medical Economics

T2 - Journal of Medical Economics

JF - Journal of Medical Economics

SN - 1369-6998

IS - 2

ER -