TY - JOUR
T1 - A narrative review of frailty assessment in older patients at the emergency department
AU - van Dam, Carmen S.
AU - Hoogendijk, Emiel O.
AU - Mooijaart, Simon P.
AU - Smulders, Yvo M.
AU - de Vet, Riekie C. W.
AU - Lucke, Jacinta A.
AU - Blomaard, Laura C.
AU - Otten, René H. J.
AU - Muller, Majon
AU - Nanayakkara, Prabath W. B.
AU - Trappenburg, Marijke C.
AU - Peters, Mike J. L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Cambridge University Press. All rights reserved.
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Optimizing emergency care for the aging population is an important future challenge, as the proportion of older patients at the emergency department (ED) rapidly increases. Older patients, particularly those who are frail, have a high risk of adverse outcomes after an ED visit, such as functional decline, institutionalization, and death. The ED can have a key position in identifying frail older patients who benefit most from comprehensive geriatric care [including delirium preventive measures, early evaluation of after-discharge care, and a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA)]. However, performing extensive frailty assessment is not suitable at the ED. Therefore, quick and easy-to-use instruments are needed to identify older patients at risk for adverse outcomes. This narrative review outlines the importance and complexity of frailty assessment at the ED. It aligns the available screening instruments, including clinical judgment as frailty assessment, and summarizes arguments for and against frailty assessment at the ED.
AB - Optimizing emergency care for the aging population is an important future challenge, as the proportion of older patients at the emergency department (ED) rapidly increases. Older patients, particularly those who are frail, have a high risk of adverse outcomes after an ED visit, such as functional decline, institutionalization, and death. The ED can have a key position in identifying frail older patients who benefit most from comprehensive geriatric care [including delirium preventive measures, early evaluation of after-discharge care, and a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA)]. However, performing extensive frailty assessment is not suitable at the ED. Therefore, quick and easy-to-use instruments are needed to identify older patients at risk for adverse outcomes. This narrative review outlines the importance and complexity of frailty assessment at the ED. It aligns the available screening instruments, including clinical judgment as frailty assessment, and summarizes arguments for and against frailty assessment at the ED.
KW - acute care
KW - aging
KW - emergency department
KW - frailty
KW - geriatrics
KW - screening
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85109293291&origin=inward
UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33883392
U2 - 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000811
DO - 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000811
M3 - Review article
C2 - 33883392
SN - 0969-9546
SP - 266
EP - 276
JO - European Journal of Emergency Medicine
JF - European Journal of Emergency Medicine
ER -