A Quality of Life Perspective on the New Eugenics

Ivan Brown, Roy I. Brown, Alice Schippers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Quality of life is a concept that has had robust development and application in the field of intellectual disability in recent decades. It functions as an apt goal for individuals to enhance their lives, as well as for policy and disability support. Quality of life helps address ethical issues by acting as a key guidepost in ethical considerations. Current philosophical and human rights approaches to disability support the view that intellectual disability is no reason to assume poor quality of life. Moreover, individuals with intellectual disabilities themselves typically rate their own quality of life quite high. Similarly, families perceive disability as contributing to family quality of life in some ways, although this is tempered by social constructs, especially normalcy, that support marginalization and discrimination. Disability Studies, and critical disability theory that constitutes much of its foundation, offer an alternative perspective of intellectual disability that values its contribution to larger society-intellectual disability as a positive and necessary aspect of the diversity within the human mosaic. It is argued that this perspective of intellectual disability negates the necessity of new eugenics practices.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)121-126
JournalJournal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities
Volume16
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Cite this

@article{0e2230ae24e54682bd2e33c0c44b6cae,
title = "A Quality of Life Perspective on the New Eugenics",
abstract = "Quality of life is a concept that has had robust development and application in the field of intellectual disability in recent decades. It functions as an apt goal for individuals to enhance their lives, as well as for policy and disability support. Quality of life helps address ethical issues by acting as a key guidepost in ethical considerations. Current philosophical and human rights approaches to disability support the view that intellectual disability is no reason to assume poor quality of life. Moreover, individuals with intellectual disabilities themselves typically rate their own quality of life quite high. Similarly, families perceive disability as contributing to family quality of life in some ways, although this is tempered by social constructs, especially normalcy, that support marginalization and discrimination. Disability Studies, and critical disability theory that constitutes much of its foundation, offer an alternative perspective of intellectual disability that values its contribution to larger society-intellectual disability as a positive and necessary aspect of the diversity within the human mosaic. It is argued that this perspective of intellectual disability negates the necessity of new eugenics practices.",
author = "Ivan Brown and Brown, {Roy I.} and Alice Schippers",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1111/jppi.12299",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "121--126",
journal = "Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities",
issn = "1741-1122",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

A Quality of Life Perspective on the New Eugenics. / Brown, Ivan; Brown, Roy I.; Schippers, Alice.

In: Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2019, p. 121-126.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Quality of Life Perspective on the New Eugenics

AU - Brown, Ivan

AU - Brown, Roy I.

AU - Schippers, Alice

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Quality of life is a concept that has had robust development and application in the field of intellectual disability in recent decades. It functions as an apt goal for individuals to enhance their lives, as well as for policy and disability support. Quality of life helps address ethical issues by acting as a key guidepost in ethical considerations. Current philosophical and human rights approaches to disability support the view that intellectual disability is no reason to assume poor quality of life. Moreover, individuals with intellectual disabilities themselves typically rate their own quality of life quite high. Similarly, families perceive disability as contributing to family quality of life in some ways, although this is tempered by social constructs, especially normalcy, that support marginalization and discrimination. Disability Studies, and critical disability theory that constitutes much of its foundation, offer an alternative perspective of intellectual disability that values its contribution to larger society-intellectual disability as a positive and necessary aspect of the diversity within the human mosaic. It is argued that this perspective of intellectual disability negates the necessity of new eugenics practices.

AB - Quality of life is a concept that has had robust development and application in the field of intellectual disability in recent decades. It functions as an apt goal for individuals to enhance their lives, as well as for policy and disability support. Quality of life helps address ethical issues by acting as a key guidepost in ethical considerations. Current philosophical and human rights approaches to disability support the view that intellectual disability is no reason to assume poor quality of life. Moreover, individuals with intellectual disabilities themselves typically rate their own quality of life quite high. Similarly, families perceive disability as contributing to family quality of life in some ways, although this is tempered by social constructs, especially normalcy, that support marginalization and discrimination. Disability Studies, and critical disability theory that constitutes much of its foundation, offer an alternative perspective of intellectual disability that values its contribution to larger society-intellectual disability as a positive and necessary aspect of the diversity within the human mosaic. It is argued that this perspective of intellectual disability negates the necessity of new eugenics practices.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85068039986&origin=inward

U2 - 10.1111/jppi.12299

DO - 10.1111/jppi.12299

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 121

EP - 126

JO - Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities

JF - Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities

SN - 1741-1122

IS - 2

ER -