A randomised controlled trial comparing compression therapy after stripping for primary great saphenous vein incompetence

Attila G. Krasznai, Tim A. Sigterman, Janine P. Houtermans-Auckel, Ed Eussen, Maarten Snoeijs, Kees Jan J. M. Sikkink, Edith M. de Boer, Cees H. A. Wittens, Lee H. Bouwman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Venous insufficiency of the lower extremity affects up to 40–60% of general adult population in the Western population, of which around 25% has varicose veins mostly treated by ablation of the incompetent great saphenous vein. Although endovenous options are available, the majority is still treated with stripping of the great saphenous vein for which there is no consensus regarding postoperative compressive therapy. The objective of this prospective randomised controlled trial was to evaluate 4 h compared to 72 h of leg compression after great saphenous vein stripping. Method: Patients in the Zuyderland Medical Centre with an indication for stripping of the great saphenous vein were eligible for inclusion in this study. Patients were randomised to 4 or 72 h of leg compression (standard elastic bandaging) after stripping of the great saphenous vein. Primary outcome was change in leg volume after 14 days. Secondary outcomes were post-operative pain scores, complications and time to full recovery. Results: A total of 78 patients were randomised, 36 patients enrolled the intervention (4 h) group and 42 patients the control group (72 h). The intervention group (4 h) showed a 57 mL reduction in leg volume after 14 days, compared to 6 mL of the control group (72 h) (p = 0.11). Post-operative pain, complications and time to full recovery did not statistically differ. Conclusion: Wearing leg compression four hours after stripping is non-inferior in preventing leg oedema compared with 72 h compression therapy. No statistically significant difference in pain and time to full recovery was shown.
Original languageEnglish
JournalPhlebology
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Cite this

Krasznai, A. G., Sigterman, T. A., Houtermans-Auckel, J. P., Eussen, E., Snoeijs, M., Sikkink, K. J. J. M., ... Bouwman, L. H. (2019). A randomised controlled trial comparing compression therapy after stripping for primary great saphenous vein incompetence. Phlebology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268355519833255
Krasznai, Attila G. ; Sigterman, Tim A. ; Houtermans-Auckel, Janine P. ; Eussen, Ed ; Snoeijs, Maarten ; Sikkink, Kees Jan J. M. ; de Boer, Edith M. ; Wittens, Cees H. A. ; Bouwman, Lee H. / A randomised controlled trial comparing compression therapy after stripping for primary great saphenous vein incompetence. In: Phlebology. 2019.
@article{9e5a55868af64960860978f308b2c023,
title = "A randomised controlled trial comparing compression therapy after stripping for primary great saphenous vein incompetence",
abstract = "Background: Venous insufficiency of the lower extremity affects up to 40–60{\%} of general adult population in the Western population, of which around 25{\%} has varicose veins mostly treated by ablation of the incompetent great saphenous vein. Although endovenous options are available, the majority is still treated with stripping of the great saphenous vein for which there is no consensus regarding postoperative compressive therapy. The objective of this prospective randomised controlled trial was to evaluate 4 h compared to 72 h of leg compression after great saphenous vein stripping. Method: Patients in the Zuyderland Medical Centre with an indication for stripping of the great saphenous vein were eligible for inclusion in this study. Patients were randomised to 4 or 72 h of leg compression (standard elastic bandaging) after stripping of the great saphenous vein. Primary outcome was change in leg volume after 14 days. Secondary outcomes were post-operative pain scores, complications and time to full recovery. Results: A total of 78 patients were randomised, 36 patients enrolled the intervention (4 h) group and 42 patients the control group (72 h). The intervention group (4 h) showed a 57 mL reduction in leg volume after 14 days, compared to 6 mL of the control group (72 h) (p = 0.11). Post-operative pain, complications and time to full recovery did not statistically differ. Conclusion: Wearing leg compression four hours after stripping is non-inferior in preventing leg oedema compared with 72 h compression therapy. No statistically significant difference in pain and time to full recovery was shown.",
author = "Krasznai, {Attila G.} and Sigterman, {Tim A.} and Houtermans-Auckel, {Janine P.} and Ed Eussen and Maarten Snoeijs and Sikkink, {Kees Jan J. M.} and {de Boer}, {Edith M.} and Wittens, {Cees H. A.} and Bouwman, {Lee H.}",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1177/0268355519833255",
language = "English",
journal = "Phlebology",
issn = "0268-3555",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

}

Krasznai, AG, Sigterman, TA, Houtermans-Auckel, JP, Eussen, E, Snoeijs, M, Sikkink, KJJM, de Boer, EM, Wittens, CHA & Bouwman, LH 2019, 'A randomised controlled trial comparing compression therapy after stripping for primary great saphenous vein incompetence' Phlebology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268355519833255

A randomised controlled trial comparing compression therapy after stripping for primary great saphenous vein incompetence. / Krasznai, Attila G.; Sigterman, Tim A.; Houtermans-Auckel, Janine P.; Eussen, Ed; Snoeijs, Maarten; Sikkink, Kees Jan J. M.; de Boer, Edith M.; Wittens, Cees H. A.; Bouwman, Lee H.

In: Phlebology, 2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A randomised controlled trial comparing compression therapy after stripping for primary great saphenous vein incompetence

AU - Krasznai, Attila G.

AU - Sigterman, Tim A.

AU - Houtermans-Auckel, Janine P.

AU - Eussen, Ed

AU - Snoeijs, Maarten

AU - Sikkink, Kees Jan J. M.

AU - de Boer, Edith M.

AU - Wittens, Cees H. A.

AU - Bouwman, Lee H.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Background: Venous insufficiency of the lower extremity affects up to 40–60% of general adult population in the Western population, of which around 25% has varicose veins mostly treated by ablation of the incompetent great saphenous vein. Although endovenous options are available, the majority is still treated with stripping of the great saphenous vein for which there is no consensus regarding postoperative compressive therapy. The objective of this prospective randomised controlled trial was to evaluate 4 h compared to 72 h of leg compression after great saphenous vein stripping. Method: Patients in the Zuyderland Medical Centre with an indication for stripping of the great saphenous vein were eligible for inclusion in this study. Patients were randomised to 4 or 72 h of leg compression (standard elastic bandaging) after stripping of the great saphenous vein. Primary outcome was change in leg volume after 14 days. Secondary outcomes were post-operative pain scores, complications and time to full recovery. Results: A total of 78 patients were randomised, 36 patients enrolled the intervention (4 h) group and 42 patients the control group (72 h). The intervention group (4 h) showed a 57 mL reduction in leg volume after 14 days, compared to 6 mL of the control group (72 h) (p = 0.11). Post-operative pain, complications and time to full recovery did not statistically differ. Conclusion: Wearing leg compression four hours after stripping is non-inferior in preventing leg oedema compared with 72 h compression therapy. No statistically significant difference in pain and time to full recovery was shown.

AB - Background: Venous insufficiency of the lower extremity affects up to 40–60% of general adult population in the Western population, of which around 25% has varicose veins mostly treated by ablation of the incompetent great saphenous vein. Although endovenous options are available, the majority is still treated with stripping of the great saphenous vein for which there is no consensus regarding postoperative compressive therapy. The objective of this prospective randomised controlled trial was to evaluate 4 h compared to 72 h of leg compression after great saphenous vein stripping. Method: Patients in the Zuyderland Medical Centre with an indication for stripping of the great saphenous vein were eligible for inclusion in this study. Patients were randomised to 4 or 72 h of leg compression (standard elastic bandaging) after stripping of the great saphenous vein. Primary outcome was change in leg volume after 14 days. Secondary outcomes were post-operative pain scores, complications and time to full recovery. Results: A total of 78 patients were randomised, 36 patients enrolled the intervention (4 h) group and 42 patients the control group (72 h). The intervention group (4 h) showed a 57 mL reduction in leg volume after 14 days, compared to 6 mL of the control group (72 h) (p = 0.11). Post-operative pain, complications and time to full recovery did not statistically differ. Conclusion: Wearing leg compression four hours after stripping is non-inferior in preventing leg oedema compared with 72 h compression therapy. No statistically significant difference in pain and time to full recovery was shown.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85063035267&origin=inward

UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30862278

U2 - 10.1177/0268355519833255

DO - 10.1177/0268355519833255

M3 - Article

JO - Phlebology

JF - Phlebology

SN - 0268-3555

ER -