A Survey on the Use and Barriers of Surface Electromyography in Neurorehabilitation

Andrea Manca, Andrea Cereatti, Lynn Bar-On, Alberto Botter, Ugo Della Croce, Marco Knaflitz, Nicola A. Maffiuletti, Davide Mazzoli, Andrea Merlo, Silvestro Roatta, Andrea Turolla, Franca Deriu*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Historical, educational, and technical barriers have been reported to limit the use of surface electromyography (sEMG) in clinical neurorehabilitation settings. In an attempt to identify, review, rank, and interpret potential factors that may play a role in this scenario, we gathered information on (1) current use of sEMG and its clinical potential; (2) professional figures primarily dealing with sEMG; (3) educational aspects, and (4) possible barriers and reasons for its apparently limited use in neurorehabilitation. To this aim, an online 30-question survey was sent to 52 experts on sEMG from diverse standpoints, backgrounds, and countries. Participants were asked to respond to each question on a 5-point Likert scale or by ranking items. A cut-off of 75% agreement was chosen as the consensus threshold. Thirty-five invitees (67%) completed the electronic survey. Consensus was reached for 77% of the proposed questions encompassing current trends in sEMG use in neurorehabilitation, educational, technical, and methodological features as well as its translational utility for clinicians and patients. Data evidenced the clinical utility of sEMG for patient assessment, to define the intervention plan, and to complement/optimize other methods used to quantify muscle and physical function. The aggregate opinion of the interviewed experts confirmed that sEMG is more frequently employed in technical/methodological than clinical research. Moreover, the slow dissemination of research findings and the lack of education on sEMG seem to prevent prompt transfer into practice. The findings of the present survey may contribute to the ongoing debate on the appropriateness and value of sEMG for neurorehabilitation professionals and its potential translation into clinical settings.

Original languageEnglish
Article number573616
JournalFrontiers in Neurology
Volume11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Oct 2020

Cite this