A systematic review of bilateral upper limb training devices for poststroke rehabilitation

A Lex E Q van Delden, C Lieke E Peper, Gert Kwakkel, Peter J Beek

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

25 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Introduction. In stroke rehabilitation, bilateral upper limb training is gaining ground. As a result, a growing number of mechanical and robotic bilateral upper limb training devices have been proposed. Objective. To provide an overview and qualitative evaluation of the clinical applicability of bilateral upper limb training devices. Methods. Potentially relevant literature was searched in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases from 1990 onwards. Devices were categorized as mechanical or robotic (according to the PubMed MeSH term of robotics). Results. In total, 6 mechanical and 14 robotic bilateral upper limb training devices were evaluated in terms of mechanical and electromechanical characteristics, supported movement patterns, targeted part and active involvement of the upper limb, training protocols, outcomes of clinical trials, and commercial availability. Conclusion. Initial clinical results are not yet of such caliber that the devices in question and the concepts on which they are based are firmly established. However, the clinical outcomes do not rule out the possibility that the concept of bilateral training and the accompanied devices may provide a useful extension of currently available forms of therapy. To actually demonstrate their (surplus) value, more research with adequate experimental, dose-matched designs, and sufficient statistical power are required.

Original languageEnglish
Article number972069
Pages (from-to)972069
Number of pages17
JournalStroke Research and Treatment
Volume2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Cite this

van Delden, A Lex E Q ; Peper, C Lieke E ; Kwakkel, Gert ; Beek, Peter J. / A systematic review of bilateral upper limb training devices for poststroke rehabilitation. In: Stroke Research and Treatment. 2012 ; Vol. 2012. pp. 972069.
@article{7c9b1839f3c64c7f8bba7af8a46d3a40,
title = "A systematic review of bilateral upper limb training devices for poststroke rehabilitation",
abstract = "Introduction. In stroke rehabilitation, bilateral upper limb training is gaining ground. As a result, a growing number of mechanical and robotic bilateral upper limb training devices have been proposed. Objective. To provide an overview and qualitative evaluation of the clinical applicability of bilateral upper limb training devices. Methods. Potentially relevant literature was searched in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases from 1990 onwards. Devices were categorized as mechanical or robotic (according to the PubMed MeSH term of robotics). Results. In total, 6 mechanical and 14 robotic bilateral upper limb training devices were evaluated in terms of mechanical and electromechanical characteristics, supported movement patterns, targeted part and active involvement of the upper limb, training protocols, outcomes of clinical trials, and commercial availability. Conclusion. Initial clinical results are not yet of such caliber that the devices in question and the concepts on which they are based are firmly established. However, the clinical outcomes do not rule out the possibility that the concept of bilateral training and the accompanied devices may provide a useful extension of currently available forms of therapy. To actually demonstrate their (surplus) value, more research with adequate experimental, dose-matched designs, and sufficient statistical power are required.",
author = "{van Delden}, {A Lex E Q} and Peper, {C Lieke E} and Gert Kwakkel and Beek, {Peter J}",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1155/2012/972069",
language = "English",
volume = "2012",
pages = "972069",
journal = "Stroke Research and Treatment",
issn = "2090-8105",
publisher = "Hindawi Publishing Corporation",

}

A systematic review of bilateral upper limb training devices for poststroke rehabilitation. / van Delden, A Lex E Q; Peper, C Lieke E; Kwakkel, Gert; Beek, Peter J.

In: Stroke Research and Treatment, Vol. 2012, 972069, 2012, p. 972069.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A systematic review of bilateral upper limb training devices for poststroke rehabilitation

AU - van Delden, A Lex E Q

AU - Peper, C Lieke E

AU - Kwakkel, Gert

AU - Beek, Peter J

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Introduction. In stroke rehabilitation, bilateral upper limb training is gaining ground. As a result, a growing number of mechanical and robotic bilateral upper limb training devices have been proposed. Objective. To provide an overview and qualitative evaluation of the clinical applicability of bilateral upper limb training devices. Methods. Potentially relevant literature was searched in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases from 1990 onwards. Devices were categorized as mechanical or robotic (according to the PubMed MeSH term of robotics). Results. In total, 6 mechanical and 14 robotic bilateral upper limb training devices were evaluated in terms of mechanical and electromechanical characteristics, supported movement patterns, targeted part and active involvement of the upper limb, training protocols, outcomes of clinical trials, and commercial availability. Conclusion. Initial clinical results are not yet of such caliber that the devices in question and the concepts on which they are based are firmly established. However, the clinical outcomes do not rule out the possibility that the concept of bilateral training and the accompanied devices may provide a useful extension of currently available forms of therapy. To actually demonstrate their (surplus) value, more research with adequate experimental, dose-matched designs, and sufficient statistical power are required.

AB - Introduction. In stroke rehabilitation, bilateral upper limb training is gaining ground. As a result, a growing number of mechanical and robotic bilateral upper limb training devices have been proposed. Objective. To provide an overview and qualitative evaluation of the clinical applicability of bilateral upper limb training devices. Methods. Potentially relevant literature was searched in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases from 1990 onwards. Devices were categorized as mechanical or robotic (according to the PubMed MeSH term of robotics). Results. In total, 6 mechanical and 14 robotic bilateral upper limb training devices were evaluated in terms of mechanical and electromechanical characteristics, supported movement patterns, targeted part and active involvement of the upper limb, training protocols, outcomes of clinical trials, and commercial availability. Conclusion. Initial clinical results are not yet of such caliber that the devices in question and the concepts on which they are based are firmly established. However, the clinical outcomes do not rule out the possibility that the concept of bilateral training and the accompanied devices may provide a useful extension of currently available forms of therapy. To actually demonstrate their (surplus) value, more research with adequate experimental, dose-matched designs, and sufficient statistical power are required.

U2 - 10.1155/2012/972069

DO - 10.1155/2012/972069

M3 - Article

VL - 2012

SP - 972069

JO - Stroke Research and Treatment

JF - Stroke Research and Treatment

SN - 2090-8105

M1 - 972069

ER -