A verifiable solution to the MEG inverse problem

Gareth R Barnes, Paul Lawrence Furlong, Krish D Singh, Arjan Hillebrand

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a non-invasive brain imaging technique with the potential for very high temporal and spatial resolution of neuronal activity. The main stumbling block for the technique has been that the estimation of a neuronal current distribution, based on sensor data outside the head, is an inverse problem with an infinity of possible solutions. Many inversion techniques exist, all using different a-priori assumptions in order to reduce the number of possible solutions. Although all techniques can be thoroughly tested in simulation, implicit in the simulations are the experimenter's own assumptions about realistic brain function. To date, the only way to test the validity of inversions based on real MEG data has been through direct surgical validation, or through comparison with invasive primate data. In this work, we constructed a null hypothesis that the reconstruction of neuronal activity contains no information on the distribution of the cortical grey matter. To test this, we repeatedly compared rotated sections of grey matter with a beamformer estimate of neuronal activity to generate a distribution of mutual information values. The significance of the comparison between the un-rotated anatomical information and the electrical estimate was subsequently assessed against this distribution. We found that there was significant (P < 0.05) anatomical information contained in the beamformer images across a number of frequency bands. Based on the limited data presented here, we can say that the assumptions behind the beamformer algorithm are not unreasonable for the visual-motor task investigated.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)623-6
Number of pages4
JournalNeuroImage
Volume31
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2006
Externally publishedYes

Cite this

Barnes, Gareth R ; Furlong, Paul Lawrence ; Singh, Krish D ; Hillebrand, Arjan. / A verifiable solution to the MEG inverse problem. In: NeuroImage. 2006 ; Vol. 31, No. 2. pp. 623-6.
@article{870ead5fccbd4a5fbecaf3840b173b57,
title = "A verifiable solution to the MEG inverse problem",
abstract = "Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a non-invasive brain imaging technique with the potential for very high temporal and spatial resolution of neuronal activity. The main stumbling block for the technique has been that the estimation of a neuronal current distribution, based on sensor data outside the head, is an inverse problem with an infinity of possible solutions. Many inversion techniques exist, all using different a-priori assumptions in order to reduce the number of possible solutions. Although all techniques can be thoroughly tested in simulation, implicit in the simulations are the experimenter's own assumptions about realistic brain function. To date, the only way to test the validity of inversions based on real MEG data has been through direct surgical validation, or through comparison with invasive primate data. In this work, we constructed a null hypothesis that the reconstruction of neuronal activity contains no information on the distribution of the cortical grey matter. To test this, we repeatedly compared rotated sections of grey matter with a beamformer estimate of neuronal activity to generate a distribution of mutual information values. The significance of the comparison between the un-rotated anatomical information and the electrical estimate was subsequently assessed against this distribution. We found that there was significant (P < 0.05) anatomical information contained in the beamformer images across a number of frequency bands. Based on the limited data presented here, we can say that the assumptions behind the beamformer algorithm are not unreasonable for the visual-motor task investigated.",
keywords = "Brain/anatomy & histology, Cues, Fingers/innervation, Functional Laterality, Humans, Magnetoencephalography/methods, Motor Activity, Reproducibility of Results",
author = "Barnes, {Gareth R} and Furlong, {Paul Lawrence} and Singh, {Krish D} and Arjan Hillebrand",
year = "2006",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.036",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "623--6",
journal = "NeuroImage",
issn = "1053-8119",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

A verifiable solution to the MEG inverse problem. / Barnes, Gareth R; Furlong, Paul Lawrence; Singh, Krish D; Hillebrand, Arjan.

In: NeuroImage, Vol. 31, No. 2, 06.2006, p. 623-6.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A verifiable solution to the MEG inverse problem

AU - Barnes, Gareth R

AU - Furlong, Paul Lawrence

AU - Singh, Krish D

AU - Hillebrand, Arjan

PY - 2006/6

Y1 - 2006/6

N2 - Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a non-invasive brain imaging technique with the potential for very high temporal and spatial resolution of neuronal activity. The main stumbling block for the technique has been that the estimation of a neuronal current distribution, based on sensor data outside the head, is an inverse problem with an infinity of possible solutions. Many inversion techniques exist, all using different a-priori assumptions in order to reduce the number of possible solutions. Although all techniques can be thoroughly tested in simulation, implicit in the simulations are the experimenter's own assumptions about realistic brain function. To date, the only way to test the validity of inversions based on real MEG data has been through direct surgical validation, or through comparison with invasive primate data. In this work, we constructed a null hypothesis that the reconstruction of neuronal activity contains no information on the distribution of the cortical grey matter. To test this, we repeatedly compared rotated sections of grey matter with a beamformer estimate of neuronal activity to generate a distribution of mutual information values. The significance of the comparison between the un-rotated anatomical information and the electrical estimate was subsequently assessed against this distribution. We found that there was significant (P < 0.05) anatomical information contained in the beamformer images across a number of frequency bands. Based on the limited data presented here, we can say that the assumptions behind the beamformer algorithm are not unreasonable for the visual-motor task investigated.

AB - Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a non-invasive brain imaging technique with the potential for very high temporal and spatial resolution of neuronal activity. The main stumbling block for the technique has been that the estimation of a neuronal current distribution, based on sensor data outside the head, is an inverse problem with an infinity of possible solutions. Many inversion techniques exist, all using different a-priori assumptions in order to reduce the number of possible solutions. Although all techniques can be thoroughly tested in simulation, implicit in the simulations are the experimenter's own assumptions about realistic brain function. To date, the only way to test the validity of inversions based on real MEG data has been through direct surgical validation, or through comparison with invasive primate data. In this work, we constructed a null hypothesis that the reconstruction of neuronal activity contains no information on the distribution of the cortical grey matter. To test this, we repeatedly compared rotated sections of grey matter with a beamformer estimate of neuronal activity to generate a distribution of mutual information values. The significance of the comparison between the un-rotated anatomical information and the electrical estimate was subsequently assessed against this distribution. We found that there was significant (P < 0.05) anatomical information contained in the beamformer images across a number of frequency bands. Based on the limited data presented here, we can say that the assumptions behind the beamformer algorithm are not unreasonable for the visual-motor task investigated.

KW - Brain/anatomy & histology

KW - Cues

KW - Fingers/innervation

KW - Functional Laterality

KW - Humans

KW - Magnetoencephalography/methods

KW - Motor Activity

KW - Reproducibility of Results

U2 - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.036

DO - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.036

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 623

EP - 626

JO - NeuroImage

JF - NeuroImage

SN - 1053-8119

IS - 2

ER -