Accuracy of computer-assisted surgery in mandibular reconstruction: A postoperative evaluation guideline

Gustaaf J. C. van Baar; Niels P. T. J. Liberton; Tymour Forouzanfar; Henri A. H. Winters; Frank K. J. Leusink

doi:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.11.013

Accuracy of computer-assisted surgery in mandibular reconstruction: A postoperative evaluation guideline

Gustaaf J. C. van Baar, Niels P. T. J. Liberton, Tymour Forouzanfar, Henri A. H. Winters, Frank K. J. Leusink

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

Comparing accuracy results for mandibular reconstructions using computer-assisted surgery (CAS) is limited due to heterogeneity in image acquisition, extent of mandibular resection, and evaluation methodologies between studies. We propose a practical, feasible and reproducible guideline for standardizing evaluation methods to allow valid comparisons of postoperative results and facilitate meta-analyses in the future. It offers a guide to imaging, data comparison, volume assessment of 3-dimensional models, classification of defects, and it also contains a quantitative accuracy evaluation method.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1-8
Number of pages	8
Journal	Oral Oncology
Volume	88
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.11.013
Publication status	Published - 2019

Access to Document

10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.11.013

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85056606392&origin=inward

Cite this

van Baar, G. J. C., Liberton, N. P. T. J., Forouzanfar, T., Winters, H. A. H., & Leusink, F. K. J. (2019). Accuracy of computer-assisted surgery in mandibular reconstruction: A postoperative evaluation guideline. Oral Oncology, 88, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.11.013

@article{5808d04976ac466fad30ffa0cdc17b81,

title = "Accuracy of computer-assisted surgery in mandibular reconstruction: A postoperative evaluation guideline",

abstract = "Comparing accuracy results for mandibular reconstructions using computer-assisted surgery (CAS) is limited due to heterogeneity in image acquisition, extent of mandibular resection, and evaluation methodologies between studies. We propose a practical, feasible and reproducible guideline for standardizing evaluation methods to allow valid comparisons of postoperative results and facilitate meta-analyses in the future. It offers a guide to imaging, data comparison, volume assessment of 3-dimensional models, classification of defects, and it also contains a quantitative accuracy evaluation method.",

keywords = "Computer-aided design, Computer-aided manufacturing, Computer-assisted, Data accuracy, Free tissue flaps, Mandibular reconstruction, Oral cancer, Printing, Software, Surgery, Three-dimensional",

author = "{van Baar}, {Gustaaf J. C.} and Liberton, {Niels P. T. J.} and Tymour Forouzanfar and Winters, {Henri A. H.} and Leusink, {Frank K. J.}",

year = "2019",

doi = "10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.11.013",

language = "English",

volume = "88",

pages = "1--8",

journal = "Oral Oncology",

issn = "1368-8375",

publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accuracy of computer-assisted surgery in mandibular reconstruction: A postoperative evaluation guideline

AU - van Baar, Gustaaf J. C.

AU - Liberton, Niels P. T. J.

AU - Forouzanfar, Tymour

AU - Winters, Henri A. H.

AU - Leusink, Frank K. J.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Comparing accuracy results for mandibular reconstructions using computer-assisted surgery (CAS) is limited due to heterogeneity in image acquisition, extent of mandibular resection, and evaluation methodologies between studies. We propose a practical, feasible and reproducible guideline for standardizing evaluation methods to allow valid comparisons of postoperative results and facilitate meta-analyses in the future. It offers a guide to imaging, data comparison, volume assessment of 3-dimensional models, classification of defects, and it also contains a quantitative accuracy evaluation method.

AB - Comparing accuracy results for mandibular reconstructions using computer-assisted surgery (CAS) is limited due to heterogeneity in image acquisition, extent of mandibular resection, and evaluation methodologies between studies. We propose a practical, feasible and reproducible guideline for standardizing evaluation methods to allow valid comparisons of postoperative results and facilitate meta-analyses in the future. It offers a guide to imaging, data comparison, volume assessment of 3-dimensional models, classification of defects, and it also contains a quantitative accuracy evaluation method.

KW - Computer-aided design

KW - Computer-aided manufacturing

KW - Computer-assisted

KW - Data accuracy

KW - Free tissue flaps

KW - Mandibular reconstruction

KW - Oral cancer

KW - Printing

KW - Software

KW - Surgery

KW - Three-dimensional

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85056606392&origin=inward

U2 - 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.11.013

DO - 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.11.013

M3 - Article

C2 - 30616778

VL - 88

SP - 1

EP - 8

JO - Oral Oncology

JF - Oral Oncology

SN - 1368-8375

ER -