Accuracy of computer-assisted surgery in mandibular reconstruction: A postoperative evaluation guideline

Gustaaf J. C. van Baar, Niels P. T. J. Liberton, Tymour Forouzanfar, Henri A. H. Winters, Frank K. J. Leusink

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

Comparing accuracy results for mandibular reconstructions using computer-assisted surgery (CAS) is limited due to heterogeneity in image acquisition, extent of mandibular resection, and evaluation methodologies between studies. We propose a practical, feasible and reproducible guideline for standardizing evaluation methods to allow valid comparisons of postoperative results and facilitate meta-analyses in the future. It offers a guide to imaging, data comparison, volume assessment of 3-dimensional models, classification of defects, and it also contains a quantitative accuracy evaluation method.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1-8
JournalOral Oncology
Volume88
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Cite this

van Baar, Gustaaf J. C. ; Liberton, Niels P. T. J. ; Forouzanfar, Tymour ; Winters, Henri A. H. ; Leusink, Frank K. J. / Accuracy of computer-assisted surgery in mandibular reconstruction: A postoperative evaluation guideline. In: Oral Oncology. 2019 ; Vol. 88. pp. 1-8.
@article{5808d04976ac466fad30ffa0cdc17b81,
title = "Accuracy of computer-assisted surgery in mandibular reconstruction: A postoperative evaluation guideline",
abstract = "Comparing accuracy results for mandibular reconstructions using computer-assisted surgery (CAS) is limited due to heterogeneity in image acquisition, extent of mandibular resection, and evaluation methodologies between studies. We propose a practical, feasible and reproducible guideline for standardizing evaluation methods to allow valid comparisons of postoperative results and facilitate meta-analyses in the future. It offers a guide to imaging, data comparison, volume assessment of 3-dimensional models, classification of defects, and it also contains a quantitative accuracy evaluation method.",
author = "{van Baar}, {Gustaaf J. C.} and Liberton, {Niels P. T. J.} and Tymour Forouzanfar and Winters, {Henri A. H.} and Leusink, {Frank K. J.}",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.11.013",
language = "English",
volume = "88",
pages = "1--8",
journal = "Oral Oncology",
issn = "1368-8375",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

van Baar, GJC, Liberton, NPTJ, Forouzanfar, T, Winters, HAH & Leusink, FKJ 2019, 'Accuracy of computer-assisted surgery in mandibular reconstruction: A postoperative evaluation guideline', Oral Oncology, vol. 88, pp. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.11.013

Accuracy of computer-assisted surgery in mandibular reconstruction: A postoperative evaluation guideline. / van Baar, Gustaaf J. C.; Liberton, Niels P. T. J.; Forouzanfar, Tymour; Winters, Henri A. H.; Leusink, Frank K. J.

In: Oral Oncology, Vol. 88, 2019, p. 1-8.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accuracy of computer-assisted surgery in mandibular reconstruction: A postoperative evaluation guideline

AU - van Baar, Gustaaf J. C.

AU - Liberton, Niels P. T. J.

AU - Forouzanfar, Tymour

AU - Winters, Henri A. H.

AU - Leusink, Frank K. J.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Comparing accuracy results for mandibular reconstructions using computer-assisted surgery (CAS) is limited due to heterogeneity in image acquisition, extent of mandibular resection, and evaluation methodologies between studies. We propose a practical, feasible and reproducible guideline for standardizing evaluation methods to allow valid comparisons of postoperative results and facilitate meta-analyses in the future. It offers a guide to imaging, data comparison, volume assessment of 3-dimensional models, classification of defects, and it also contains a quantitative accuracy evaluation method.

AB - Comparing accuracy results for mandibular reconstructions using computer-assisted surgery (CAS) is limited due to heterogeneity in image acquisition, extent of mandibular resection, and evaluation methodologies between studies. We propose a practical, feasible and reproducible guideline for standardizing evaluation methods to allow valid comparisons of postoperative results and facilitate meta-analyses in the future. It offers a guide to imaging, data comparison, volume assessment of 3-dimensional models, classification of defects, and it also contains a quantitative accuracy evaluation method.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85056606392&origin=inward

U2 - 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.11.013

DO - 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.11.013

M3 - Article

VL - 88

SP - 1

EP - 8

JO - Oral Oncology

T2 - Oral Oncology

JF - Oral Oncology

SN - 1368-8375

ER -

van Baar GJC, Liberton NPTJ, Forouzanfar T, Winters HAH, Leusink FKJ. Accuracy of computer-assisted surgery in mandibular reconstruction: A postoperative evaluation guideline. Oral Oncology. 2019;88:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.11.013

Access to Document