TY - JOUR
T1 - Additive or sequential nucleoside analogue therapy compared with continued zidovudine monotherapy in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients with advanced disease does not prolong survival
T2 - An observational study
AU - Van Leeuwen, Remko
AU - Bonsel, Gouke J.
AU - Reiss, Peter
AU - Danner, Sven A.
AU - Lange, Joep M.A.
PY - 1997
Y1 - 1997
N2 - To study the effect of sequential or additive use of zalcitabine or didanosine on survival in 308 human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients with advanced disease treated with zidovudine, an observational study using time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models was done. Changing to sequential or additive therapy was based on deterioration of a patient's health status, a significant drop in CD4 cell count, or intolerance for zidovudine. The median CD4 cell count at baseline was 110 x 106/L; 42% of patients had AIDS. The median count before a change in therapy was 50 x 106/L. Additive or sequential treatment was associated with an increased risk for death (relative hazard, 1.59; 95% confidence interval ICI], 1.01- 2.49; and 1.58; 95% CI, 1.10-2.37, respectively). Adjustment of the models for prognostic factors failed to substantially affect this observation. Possibly the lack of benefit in this study is because patients switched therapy at advanced stages, whereas the switch may be more effective in early disease.
AB - To study the effect of sequential or additive use of zalcitabine or didanosine on survival in 308 human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients with advanced disease treated with zidovudine, an observational study using time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models was done. Changing to sequential or additive therapy was based on deterioration of a patient's health status, a significant drop in CD4 cell count, or intolerance for zidovudine. The median CD4 cell count at baseline was 110 x 106/L; 42% of patients had AIDS. The median count before a change in therapy was 50 x 106/L. Additive or sequential treatment was associated with an increased risk for death (relative hazard, 1.59; 95% confidence interval ICI], 1.01- 2.49; and 1.58; 95% CI, 1.10-2.37, respectively). Adjustment of the models for prognostic factors failed to substantially affect this observation. Possibly the lack of benefit in this study is because patients switched therapy at advanced stages, whereas the switch may be more effective in early disease.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030946143&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1086/516466
DO - 10.1086/516466
M3 - Article
C2 - 9180173
AN - SCOPUS:0030946143
VL - 175
SP - 1344
EP - 1351
JO - Journal of Infectious Diseases
JF - Journal of Infectious Diseases
SN - 0022-1899
IS - 6
ER -