Adherence to a web-based pre-treatment for phobias in outpatient clinics

Robin N. Kok, Aartjan T.F. Beekman, Pim Cuijpers, Annemieke van Straten

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background Non-adherence in Internet interventions is a persistent and multifaceted issue and potentially limits the applicability and effectiveness of these interventions. Factors that influence non-adherence are poorly understood, especially in outpatient samples with more complex symptoms. Objective The current study is a secondary analysis of data from a randomised controlled trial that examined the cost-effectiveness of offering an Internet-based exposure treatment to phobic outpatients on a wait-list to receive face-to-face psychotherapy. Methods We collected baseline demographic and clinical information, and adherence data of the Internet-based intervention and conducted regression analyses to predict non-adherence to the intervention. Results The adherence to the intervention was low, with only 13.3% of 105 patients completing all five lessons of the intervention. The median number of exercises completed (out of a possible 8) was 3. In a multi-predictor model, a higher baseline score of anxiety (OR = 0.94, 95% CI 0.90–0.99) was a risk factor for low adherence. Higher age (OR = 1.05, 95% CI 1.00–1.09) was a protective factor against non-adherence. Participants who adhered to the intervention were more likely to complete post-test assessments, further biasing results. However, overall participant attrition was high. The results are based on a small subset of participants and should be interpreted with caution. Conclusions Poor baseline clinical status and age are factors to consider when deciding whether to offer an Internet-based intervention to outpatients. Low adherence among those patients might be related to intrinsic motivation and might even be lower in outpatient settings where participants expect to receive face-to-face treatment. It might be worthwhile to develop a concise instrument to assess intrinsic motivation and treatment expectations for using Internet-based interventions, and for the therapist to review the range of possible (Internet-based) intervention options to suit personal preferences and expectations. Trial registration Netherlands Trial Register, NTR2233.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)38-45
Number of pages8
JournalInternet Interventions
Volume9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2017

Cite this

Kok, Robin N. ; Beekman, Aartjan T.F. ; Cuijpers, Pim ; van Straten, Annemieke. / Adherence to a web-based pre-treatment for phobias in outpatient clinics. In: Internet Interventions. 2017 ; Vol. 9. pp. 38-45.
@article{39af67d43f4940959daf90dce4930fcf,
title = "Adherence to a web-based pre-treatment for phobias in outpatient clinics",
abstract = "Background Non-adherence in Internet interventions is a persistent and multifaceted issue and potentially limits the applicability and effectiveness of these interventions. Factors that influence non-adherence are poorly understood, especially in outpatient samples with more complex symptoms. Objective The current study is a secondary analysis of data from a randomised controlled trial that examined the cost-effectiveness of offering an Internet-based exposure treatment to phobic outpatients on a wait-list to receive face-to-face psychotherapy. Methods We collected baseline demographic and clinical information, and adherence data of the Internet-based intervention and conducted regression analyses to predict non-adherence to the intervention. Results The adherence to the intervention was low, with only 13.3{\%} of 105 patients completing all five lessons of the intervention. The median number of exercises completed (out of a possible 8) was 3. In a multi-predictor model, a higher baseline score of anxiety (OR = 0.94, 95{\%} CI 0.90–0.99) was a risk factor for low adherence. Higher age (OR = 1.05, 95{\%} CI 1.00–1.09) was a protective factor against non-adherence. Participants who adhered to the intervention were more likely to complete post-test assessments, further biasing results. However, overall participant attrition was high. The results are based on a small subset of participants and should be interpreted with caution. Conclusions Poor baseline clinical status and age are factors to consider when deciding whether to offer an Internet-based intervention to outpatients. Low adherence among those patients might be related to intrinsic motivation and might even be lower in outpatient settings where participants expect to receive face-to-face treatment. It might be worthwhile to develop a concise instrument to assess intrinsic motivation and treatment expectations for using Internet-based interventions, and for the therapist to review the range of possible (Internet-based) intervention options to suit personal preferences and expectations. Trial registration Netherlands Trial Register, NTR2233.",
keywords = "Adherence, Dropout, Internet Intervention, Non-adherence, Predictors",
author = "Kok, {Robin N.} and Beekman, {Aartjan T.F.} and Pim Cuijpers and {van Straten}, Annemieke",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.invent.2017.05.004",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "38--45",
journal = "Internet Interventions",
issn = "2214-7829",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

Adherence to a web-based pre-treatment for phobias in outpatient clinics. / Kok, Robin N.; Beekman, Aartjan T.F.; Cuijpers, Pim; van Straten, Annemieke.

In: Internet Interventions, Vol. 9, 01.09.2017, p. 38-45.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adherence to a web-based pre-treatment for phobias in outpatient clinics

AU - Kok, Robin N.

AU - Beekman, Aartjan T.F.

AU - Cuijpers, Pim

AU - van Straten, Annemieke

PY - 2017/9/1

Y1 - 2017/9/1

N2 - Background Non-adherence in Internet interventions is a persistent and multifaceted issue and potentially limits the applicability and effectiveness of these interventions. Factors that influence non-adherence are poorly understood, especially in outpatient samples with more complex symptoms. Objective The current study is a secondary analysis of data from a randomised controlled trial that examined the cost-effectiveness of offering an Internet-based exposure treatment to phobic outpatients on a wait-list to receive face-to-face psychotherapy. Methods We collected baseline demographic and clinical information, and adherence data of the Internet-based intervention and conducted regression analyses to predict non-adherence to the intervention. Results The adherence to the intervention was low, with only 13.3% of 105 patients completing all five lessons of the intervention. The median number of exercises completed (out of a possible 8) was 3. In a multi-predictor model, a higher baseline score of anxiety (OR = 0.94, 95% CI 0.90–0.99) was a risk factor for low adherence. Higher age (OR = 1.05, 95% CI 1.00–1.09) was a protective factor against non-adherence. Participants who adhered to the intervention were more likely to complete post-test assessments, further biasing results. However, overall participant attrition was high. The results are based on a small subset of participants and should be interpreted with caution. Conclusions Poor baseline clinical status and age are factors to consider when deciding whether to offer an Internet-based intervention to outpatients. Low adherence among those patients might be related to intrinsic motivation and might even be lower in outpatient settings where participants expect to receive face-to-face treatment. It might be worthwhile to develop a concise instrument to assess intrinsic motivation and treatment expectations for using Internet-based interventions, and for the therapist to review the range of possible (Internet-based) intervention options to suit personal preferences and expectations. Trial registration Netherlands Trial Register, NTR2233.

AB - Background Non-adherence in Internet interventions is a persistent and multifaceted issue and potentially limits the applicability and effectiveness of these interventions. Factors that influence non-adherence are poorly understood, especially in outpatient samples with more complex symptoms. Objective The current study is a secondary analysis of data from a randomised controlled trial that examined the cost-effectiveness of offering an Internet-based exposure treatment to phobic outpatients on a wait-list to receive face-to-face psychotherapy. Methods We collected baseline demographic and clinical information, and adherence data of the Internet-based intervention and conducted regression analyses to predict non-adherence to the intervention. Results The adherence to the intervention was low, with only 13.3% of 105 patients completing all five lessons of the intervention. The median number of exercises completed (out of a possible 8) was 3. In a multi-predictor model, a higher baseline score of anxiety (OR = 0.94, 95% CI 0.90–0.99) was a risk factor for low adherence. Higher age (OR = 1.05, 95% CI 1.00–1.09) was a protective factor against non-adherence. Participants who adhered to the intervention were more likely to complete post-test assessments, further biasing results. However, overall participant attrition was high. The results are based on a small subset of participants and should be interpreted with caution. Conclusions Poor baseline clinical status and age are factors to consider when deciding whether to offer an Internet-based intervention to outpatients. Low adherence among those patients might be related to intrinsic motivation and might even be lower in outpatient settings where participants expect to receive face-to-face treatment. It might be worthwhile to develop a concise instrument to assess intrinsic motivation and treatment expectations for using Internet-based interventions, and for the therapist to review the range of possible (Internet-based) intervention options to suit personal preferences and expectations. Trial registration Netherlands Trial Register, NTR2233.

KW - Adherence

KW - Dropout

KW - Internet Intervention

KW - Non-adherence

KW - Predictors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020296782&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.invent.2017.05.004

DO - 10.1016/j.invent.2017.05.004

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 38

EP - 45

JO - Internet Interventions

JF - Internet Interventions

SN - 2214-7829

ER -