Appropriate use criteria for optical coherence tomography guidance in percutaneous coronary interventions: Recommendations of the working group of interventional cardiology of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology

A. J. J. IJsselmuiden, E. M. Zwaan, R. M. Oemrawsingh, M. J. Bom, F. J. W. M. Dankers, M. J. de Boer, C. Camaro, R. J. M. van Geuns, J. Daemen, D. J. van der Heijden, J. W. Jukema, A. O. Kraaijeveld, M. Meuwissen, B. E. Schölzel, G. Pundziute, P. van der Harst, J. van Ramshorst, M. T. Dirksen, C. Zivelonghi, P. Agostoni & 8 others J. A. S. van der Heyden, J. J. Wykrzykowska, M. J. Scholte, H. M. Nef, M. J. M. Kofflard, N. van Royen, M. Alings, E. Kedhi

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Introduction: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) enables detailed imaging of the coronary wall, lumen and intracoronary implanted devices. Responding to the lack of specific appropriate use criteria (AUC) for this technique, we conducted a literature review and a procedure for appropriate use criteria. Methods: Twenty-one of all 184 members of the Dutch Working Group on Interventional Cardiology agreed to evaluate 49 pre-specified cases. During a meeting, factual indications were established whereupon members individually rated indications on a 9-point scale, with the opportunity to substantiate their scoring. Results: Twenty-six indications were rated ‘Appropriate’, eighteen indications ‘May be appropriate’, and five ‘Rarely appropriate’. Use of OCT was unanimously considered ‘Appropriate’ in stent thrombosis, and ‘Appropriate’ for guidance in PCI, especially in distal left main coronary artery and proximal left anterior descending coronary artery, unexplained angiographic abnormalities, and use of bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS). OCT was considered ‘Rarely Appropriate’ on top of fractional flow reserve (FFR) for treatment indication, assessment of strut coverage, bypass anastomoses or assessment of proximal left main coronary artery. Conclusions: The use of OCT in stent thrombosis is unanimously considered ‘Appropriate’ by these experts. Varying degrees of consensus exists on the appropriate use of OCT in other settings.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)473-483
JournalNetherlands Heart Journal
Volume26
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Cite this

IJsselmuiden, A. J. J. ; Zwaan, E. M. ; Oemrawsingh, R. M. ; Bom, M. J. ; Dankers, F. J. W. M. ; de Boer, M. J. ; Camaro, C. ; van Geuns, R. J. M. ; Daemen, J. ; van der Heijden, D. J. ; Jukema, J. W. ; Kraaijeveld, A. O. ; Meuwissen, M. ; Schölzel, B. E. ; Pundziute, G. ; van der Harst, P. ; van Ramshorst, J. ; Dirksen, M. T. ; Zivelonghi, C. ; Agostoni, P. ; van der Heyden, J. A. S. ; Wykrzykowska, J. J. ; Scholte, M. J. ; Nef, H. M. ; Kofflard, M. J. M. ; van Royen, N. ; Alings, M. ; Kedhi, E. / Appropriate use criteria for optical coherence tomography guidance in percutaneous coronary interventions: Recommendations of the working group of interventional cardiology of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology. In: Netherlands Heart Journal. 2018 ; Vol. 26, No. 10. pp. 473-483.
@article{dab6196f09b1426f8be81d60b7af6fb9,
title = "Appropriate use criteria for optical coherence tomography guidance in percutaneous coronary interventions: Recommendations of the working group of interventional cardiology of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology",
abstract = "Introduction: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) enables detailed imaging of the coronary wall, lumen and intracoronary implanted devices. Responding to the lack of specific appropriate use criteria (AUC) for this technique, we conducted a literature review and a procedure for appropriate use criteria. Methods: Twenty-one of all 184 members of the Dutch Working Group on Interventional Cardiology agreed to evaluate 49 pre-specified cases. During a meeting, factual indications were established whereupon members individually rated indications on a 9-point scale, with the opportunity to substantiate their scoring. Results: Twenty-six indications were rated ‘Appropriate’, eighteen indications ‘May be appropriate’, and five ‘Rarely appropriate’. Use of OCT was unanimously considered ‘Appropriate’ in stent thrombosis, and ‘Appropriate’ for guidance in PCI, especially in distal left main coronary artery and proximal left anterior descending coronary artery, unexplained angiographic abnormalities, and use of bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS). OCT was considered ‘Rarely Appropriate’ on top of fractional flow reserve (FFR) for treatment indication, assessment of strut coverage, bypass anastomoses or assessment of proximal left main coronary artery. Conclusions: The use of OCT in stent thrombosis is unanimously considered ‘Appropriate’ by these experts. Varying degrees of consensus exists on the appropriate use of OCT in other settings.",
author = "IJsselmuiden, {A. J. J.} and Zwaan, {E. M.} and Oemrawsingh, {R. M.} and Bom, {M. J.} and Dankers, {F. J. W. M.} and {de Boer}, {M. J.} and C. Camaro and {van Geuns}, {R. J. M.} and J. Daemen and {van der Heijden}, {D. J.} and Jukema, {J. W.} and Kraaijeveld, {A. O.} and M. Meuwissen and Sch{\"o}lzel, {B. E.} and G. Pundziute and {van der Harst}, P. and {van Ramshorst}, J. and Dirksen, {M. T.} and C. Zivelonghi and P. Agostoni and {van der Heyden}, {J. A. S.} and Wykrzykowska, {J. J.} and Scholte, {M. J.} and Nef, {H. M.} and Kofflard, {M. J. M.} and {van Royen}, N. and M. Alings and E. Kedhi",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1007/s12471-018-1143-z",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "473--483",
journal = "Netherlands Heart Journal",
issn = "1568-5888",
publisher = "Bohn Stafleu van Loghum",
number = "10",

}

IJsselmuiden, AJJ, Zwaan, EM, Oemrawsingh, RM, Bom, MJ, Dankers, FJWM, de Boer, MJ, Camaro, C, van Geuns, RJM, Daemen, J, van der Heijden, DJ, Jukema, JW, Kraaijeveld, AO, Meuwissen, M, Schölzel, BE, Pundziute, G, van der Harst, P, van Ramshorst, J, Dirksen, MT, Zivelonghi, C, Agostoni, P, van der Heyden, JAS, Wykrzykowska, JJ, Scholte, MJ, Nef, HM, Kofflard, MJM, van Royen, N, Alings, M & Kedhi, E 2018, 'Appropriate use criteria for optical coherence tomography guidance in percutaneous coronary interventions: Recommendations of the working group of interventional cardiology of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology' Netherlands Heart Journal, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 473-483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-018-1143-z

Appropriate use criteria for optical coherence tomography guidance in percutaneous coronary interventions: Recommendations of the working group of interventional cardiology of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology. / IJsselmuiden, A. J. J.; Zwaan, E. M.; Oemrawsingh, R. M.; Bom, M. J.; Dankers, F. J. W. M.; de Boer, M. J.; Camaro, C.; van Geuns, R. J. M.; Daemen, J.; van der Heijden, D. J.; Jukema, J. W.; Kraaijeveld, A. O.; Meuwissen, M.; Schölzel, B. E.; Pundziute, G.; van der Harst, P.; van Ramshorst, J.; Dirksen, M. T.; Zivelonghi, C.; Agostoni, P.; van der Heyden, J. A. S.; Wykrzykowska, J. J.; Scholte, M. J.; Nef, H. M.; Kofflard, M. J. M.; van Royen, N.; Alings, M.; Kedhi, E.

In: Netherlands Heart Journal, Vol. 26, No. 10, 2018, p. 473-483.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Appropriate use criteria for optical coherence tomography guidance in percutaneous coronary interventions: Recommendations of the working group of interventional cardiology of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology

AU - IJsselmuiden, A. J. J.

AU - Zwaan, E. M.

AU - Oemrawsingh, R. M.

AU - Bom, M. J.

AU - Dankers, F. J. W. M.

AU - de Boer, M. J.

AU - Camaro, C.

AU - van Geuns, R. J. M.

AU - Daemen, J.

AU - van der Heijden, D. J.

AU - Jukema, J. W.

AU - Kraaijeveld, A. O.

AU - Meuwissen, M.

AU - Schölzel, B. E.

AU - Pundziute, G.

AU - van der Harst, P.

AU - van Ramshorst, J.

AU - Dirksen, M. T.

AU - Zivelonghi, C.

AU - Agostoni, P.

AU - van der Heyden, J. A. S.

AU - Wykrzykowska, J. J.

AU - Scholte, M. J.

AU - Nef, H. M.

AU - Kofflard, M. J. M.

AU - van Royen, N.

AU - Alings, M.

AU - Kedhi, E.

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Introduction: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) enables detailed imaging of the coronary wall, lumen and intracoronary implanted devices. Responding to the lack of specific appropriate use criteria (AUC) for this technique, we conducted a literature review and a procedure for appropriate use criteria. Methods: Twenty-one of all 184 members of the Dutch Working Group on Interventional Cardiology agreed to evaluate 49 pre-specified cases. During a meeting, factual indications were established whereupon members individually rated indications on a 9-point scale, with the opportunity to substantiate their scoring. Results: Twenty-six indications were rated ‘Appropriate’, eighteen indications ‘May be appropriate’, and five ‘Rarely appropriate’. Use of OCT was unanimously considered ‘Appropriate’ in stent thrombosis, and ‘Appropriate’ for guidance in PCI, especially in distal left main coronary artery and proximal left anterior descending coronary artery, unexplained angiographic abnormalities, and use of bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS). OCT was considered ‘Rarely Appropriate’ on top of fractional flow reserve (FFR) for treatment indication, assessment of strut coverage, bypass anastomoses or assessment of proximal left main coronary artery. Conclusions: The use of OCT in stent thrombosis is unanimously considered ‘Appropriate’ by these experts. Varying degrees of consensus exists on the appropriate use of OCT in other settings.

AB - Introduction: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) enables detailed imaging of the coronary wall, lumen and intracoronary implanted devices. Responding to the lack of specific appropriate use criteria (AUC) for this technique, we conducted a literature review and a procedure for appropriate use criteria. Methods: Twenty-one of all 184 members of the Dutch Working Group on Interventional Cardiology agreed to evaluate 49 pre-specified cases. During a meeting, factual indications were established whereupon members individually rated indications on a 9-point scale, with the opportunity to substantiate their scoring. Results: Twenty-six indications were rated ‘Appropriate’, eighteen indications ‘May be appropriate’, and five ‘Rarely appropriate’. Use of OCT was unanimously considered ‘Appropriate’ in stent thrombosis, and ‘Appropriate’ for guidance in PCI, especially in distal left main coronary artery and proximal left anterior descending coronary artery, unexplained angiographic abnormalities, and use of bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS). OCT was considered ‘Rarely Appropriate’ on top of fractional flow reserve (FFR) for treatment indication, assessment of strut coverage, bypass anastomoses or assessment of proximal left main coronary artery. Conclusions: The use of OCT in stent thrombosis is unanimously considered ‘Appropriate’ by these experts. Varying degrees of consensus exists on the appropriate use of OCT in other settings.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85053702401&origin=inward

U2 - 10.1007/s12471-018-1143-z

DO - 10.1007/s12471-018-1143-z

M3 - Review article

VL - 26

SP - 473

EP - 483

JO - Netherlands Heart Journal

JF - Netherlands Heart Journal

SN - 1568-5888

IS - 10

ER -