Assessing Extravascular Lung Water in Critically Ill Patients Using Lung Ultrasound: A Systematic Review on Methodological Aspects in Diagnostic Accuracy Studies

Owen B. Neuteboom, Micah L. Heldeweg, Luigi Pisani, Marry R. Smit, Wim K. Lagrand, Thomas G. Cherpanath, Arjen M. Dondorp, Marcus J. Schultz, Pieter R. Tuinman*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Lung ultrasound (LUS) is a non-invasive bedside method used to quantify extravascular lung water (EVLW). To evaluate the methodology and diagnostic accuracy of LUS in studies assessing EVLW in intensive care unit patients, PubMed and Embase were searched for studies comparing LUS with imaging modalities. In 14 relevant studies a wide variety of equipment used and training of examiners were noted. Four scoring systems were reported: (i) a binary score (the presence of three or more B-lines); (ii) a categorical score; (iii) a numerical score; (iv) a quantitative LUS score using software. The diagnostic accuracy of LUS varied: sensitivity ranged from 50%–98%, specificity from 76%–100% and r² from 0.20–0.91. Methodology and diagnostic accuracy varies substantially in published reports. Further research is needed to correlate methodological factors with diagnostic accuracy. Hospitals should standardize LUS methodology. Consensus is needed to harmonize LUS methodology for lung water assessment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1557-1564
Number of pages8
JournalUltrasound in Medicine and Biology
Volume46
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2020

Cite this