Assessing impaired hypoglycemia awareness in type 1 diabetes: Agreement of self-report but not of field study data with the autonomic symptom threshold during experimental hypoglycemia

Maureen M.J. Janssen, Frank J. Snoek, Robert J. Heine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

OBJECTIVE - The aim of our study was to determine the agreement of two noninvasive methods, a self-report and a field study method, for the assessment of impaired hypoglycemia awareness with a gold standard criterion of hypoglycemia awareness, the autonomic symptom threshold during experimental hypoglycemia. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - A total of 19 type 1 diabetic patients completed a standardized questionnaire to assess impaired hypoglycemia awareness and performed a hand-held computer (HHC) study to assess their recognition of hypoglycemic episodes occurring during 2-4 weeks. Patients subsequently underwent a stepped hypoglycemic clamp to study responses to standardized hypoglycemia. Diagnoses of impaired hypoglycemia awareness were based on the separate self-report questions, a composite self- report score, and three different cutoff levels for the percentage of accurately recognized hypoglycemic episodes during the field study agreement of these noninvasive measures with the hypoglycemic clamp measure were tested by calculating kappa values, sensitivity, and specificity. RESULTS - The composite self-report score agreed reasonably well with the hypoglycemic clamp measure (kappa 0.49, sensitivity 66.7%, and specificity 85.7%) and showed a better agreement than the separate self-report questions. The HHC criterion of impaired hypoglycemia awareness did not agree with the hypoglycemic clamp criterion at any of the cutoff levels tested. CONCLUSIONS - The composite self-report tested in this study is a reasonably reliable assessment method for the diagnosis of impaired hypoglycemia awareness, using the physiological definition of an absence of autonomic symptoms at a blood glucose level of 3 mmol/l. In contrast, the recognition of hypoglycemic events in everyday life as measured using the HHC method is not related to the hypoglycemic clamp criterion.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)529-532
Number of pages4
JournalDiabetes Care
Volume23
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2000

Cite this

@article{a577ee217b4a4f109cf55662f05ede10,
title = "Assessing impaired hypoglycemia awareness in type 1 diabetes: Agreement of self-report but not of field study data with the autonomic symptom threshold during experimental hypoglycemia",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE - The aim of our study was to determine the agreement of two noninvasive methods, a self-report and a field study method, for the assessment of impaired hypoglycemia awareness with a gold standard criterion of hypoglycemia awareness, the autonomic symptom threshold during experimental hypoglycemia. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - A total of 19 type 1 diabetic patients completed a standardized questionnaire to assess impaired hypoglycemia awareness and performed a hand-held computer (HHC) study to assess their recognition of hypoglycemic episodes occurring during 2-4 weeks. Patients subsequently underwent a stepped hypoglycemic clamp to study responses to standardized hypoglycemia. Diagnoses of impaired hypoglycemia awareness were based on the separate self-report questions, a composite self- report score, and three different cutoff levels for the percentage of accurately recognized hypoglycemic episodes during the field study agreement of these noninvasive measures with the hypoglycemic clamp measure were tested by calculating kappa values, sensitivity, and specificity. RESULTS - The composite self-report score agreed reasonably well with the hypoglycemic clamp measure (kappa 0.49, sensitivity 66.7{\%}, and specificity 85.7{\%}) and showed a better agreement than the separate self-report questions. The HHC criterion of impaired hypoglycemia awareness did not agree with the hypoglycemic clamp criterion at any of the cutoff levels tested. CONCLUSIONS - The composite self-report tested in this study is a reasonably reliable assessment method for the diagnosis of impaired hypoglycemia awareness, using the physiological definition of an absence of autonomic symptoms at a blood glucose level of 3 mmol/l. In contrast, the recognition of hypoglycemic events in everyday life as measured using the HHC method is not related to the hypoglycemic clamp criterion.",
author = "Janssen, {Maureen M.J.} and Snoek, {Frank J.} and Heine, {Robert J.}",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2337/diacare.23.4.529",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "529--532",
journal = "Diabetes Care",
issn = "0149-5992",
publisher = "American Diabetes Association Inc.",
number = "4",

}

Assessing impaired hypoglycemia awareness in type 1 diabetes : Agreement of self-report but not of field study data with the autonomic symptom threshold during experimental hypoglycemia. / Janssen, Maureen M.J.; Snoek, Frank J.; Heine, Robert J.

In: Diabetes Care, Vol. 23, No. 4, 01.01.2000, p. 529-532.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing impaired hypoglycemia awareness in type 1 diabetes

T2 - Agreement of self-report but not of field study data with the autonomic symptom threshold during experimental hypoglycemia

AU - Janssen, Maureen M.J.

AU - Snoek, Frank J.

AU - Heine, Robert J.

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE - The aim of our study was to determine the agreement of two noninvasive methods, a self-report and a field study method, for the assessment of impaired hypoglycemia awareness with a gold standard criterion of hypoglycemia awareness, the autonomic symptom threshold during experimental hypoglycemia. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - A total of 19 type 1 diabetic patients completed a standardized questionnaire to assess impaired hypoglycemia awareness and performed a hand-held computer (HHC) study to assess their recognition of hypoglycemic episodes occurring during 2-4 weeks. Patients subsequently underwent a stepped hypoglycemic clamp to study responses to standardized hypoglycemia. Diagnoses of impaired hypoglycemia awareness were based on the separate self-report questions, a composite self- report score, and three different cutoff levels for the percentage of accurately recognized hypoglycemic episodes during the field study agreement of these noninvasive measures with the hypoglycemic clamp measure were tested by calculating kappa values, sensitivity, and specificity. RESULTS - The composite self-report score agreed reasonably well with the hypoglycemic clamp measure (kappa 0.49, sensitivity 66.7%, and specificity 85.7%) and showed a better agreement than the separate self-report questions. The HHC criterion of impaired hypoglycemia awareness did not agree with the hypoglycemic clamp criterion at any of the cutoff levels tested. CONCLUSIONS - The composite self-report tested in this study is a reasonably reliable assessment method for the diagnosis of impaired hypoglycemia awareness, using the physiological definition of an absence of autonomic symptoms at a blood glucose level of 3 mmol/l. In contrast, the recognition of hypoglycemic events in everyday life as measured using the HHC method is not related to the hypoglycemic clamp criterion.

AB - OBJECTIVE - The aim of our study was to determine the agreement of two noninvasive methods, a self-report and a field study method, for the assessment of impaired hypoglycemia awareness with a gold standard criterion of hypoglycemia awareness, the autonomic symptom threshold during experimental hypoglycemia. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - A total of 19 type 1 diabetic patients completed a standardized questionnaire to assess impaired hypoglycemia awareness and performed a hand-held computer (HHC) study to assess their recognition of hypoglycemic episodes occurring during 2-4 weeks. Patients subsequently underwent a stepped hypoglycemic clamp to study responses to standardized hypoglycemia. Diagnoses of impaired hypoglycemia awareness were based on the separate self-report questions, a composite self- report score, and three different cutoff levels for the percentage of accurately recognized hypoglycemic episodes during the field study agreement of these noninvasive measures with the hypoglycemic clamp measure were tested by calculating kappa values, sensitivity, and specificity. RESULTS - The composite self-report score agreed reasonably well with the hypoglycemic clamp measure (kappa 0.49, sensitivity 66.7%, and specificity 85.7%) and showed a better agreement than the separate self-report questions. The HHC criterion of impaired hypoglycemia awareness did not agree with the hypoglycemic clamp criterion at any of the cutoff levels tested. CONCLUSIONS - The composite self-report tested in this study is a reasonably reliable assessment method for the diagnosis of impaired hypoglycemia awareness, using the physiological definition of an absence of autonomic symptoms at a blood glucose level of 3 mmol/l. In contrast, the recognition of hypoglycemic events in everyday life as measured using the HHC method is not related to the hypoglycemic clamp criterion.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034111027&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2337/diacare.23.4.529

DO - 10.2337/diacare.23.4.529

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 529

EP - 532

JO - Diabetes Care

JF - Diabetes Care

SN - 0149-5992

IS - 4

ER -