Assessing tackle performance using a novel collision sport simulator in comparison to a “live” one-on-one tackling drill

Nicholas Burger, Michael Ian Lambert, Harry Hall, Sharief Hendricks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

It is necessary to study the rugby tackle as it is associated with successful performance outcomes and is responsible for the majority of contact injuries. A novel collision sport simulator was developed to study tackle performance. The main aim of this validation study was to assess tackle technique performance between two different conditions: simulator versus a standardised one-on-one tackle drill previously used to assess technique. Tackling proficiency was assessed using a list of technical criteria. Mean scores, standard deviations and Cohen’s d effect sizes were calculated. Mean overall score for dynamic i.e. running simulator tackles was 7.78 (95%CI 7.58–7.99) (out of 9) or 87% (standard deviation or SD±8.94), and mean overall score for dynamic “live” tackles was 7.85 (95%CI 7.57–8.13) (out of 9) or 87% (SD±9.60) (effect size = 0.08; trivial; p > 0.05). Mean overall score for static i.e. standing simulator tackles was 7.45 (95%CI 7.20–7.69) (out of 9) or 83% (SD±10.71), and mean overall score for static “live” tackles was 8.05 (95%CI 7.83–8.27) (out of 9) or 89% (SD±7.53) (effect size = 0.72; moderate; p < 0.001). The simulator replicates dynamic tackle technique comparable to real-life tackle drills. It may be used for research analysing various aspects of the tackle in rugby and other contact sports.
LanguageEnglish
Pages74-81
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Sports Sciences
Volume37
Issue number1
Early online date11 Jun 2018
DOIs
StatePublished - 2 Jan 2019

Cite this

@article{fca13b43298d4993a1a7f39810bccba6,
title = "Assessing tackle performance using a novel collision sport simulator in comparison to a “live” one-on-one tackling drill",
abstract = "It is necessary to study the rugby tackle as it is associated with successful performance outcomes and is responsible for the majority of contact injuries. A novel collision sport simulator was developed to study tackle performance. The main aim of this validation study was to assess tackle technique performance between two different conditions: simulator versus a standardised one-on-one tackle drill previously used to assess technique. Tackling proficiency was assessed using a list of technical criteria. Mean scores, standard deviations and Cohen’s d effect sizes were calculated. Mean overall score for dynamic i.e. running simulator tackles was 7.78 (95{\%}CI 7.58–7.99) (out of 9) or 87{\%} (standard deviation or SD±8.94), and mean overall score for dynamic “live” tackles was 7.85 (95{\%}CI 7.57–8.13) (out of 9) or 87{\%} (SD±9.60) (effect size = 0.08; trivial; p > 0.05). Mean overall score for static i.e. standing simulator tackles was 7.45 (95{\%}CI 7.20–7.69) (out of 9) or 83{\%} (SD±10.71), and mean overall score for static “live” tackles was 8.05 (95{\%}CI 7.83–8.27) (out of 9) or 89{\%} (SD±7.53) (effect size = 0.72; moderate; p < 0.001). The simulator replicates dynamic tackle technique comparable to real-life tackle drills. It may be used for research analysing various aspects of the tackle in rugby and other contact sports.",
author = "Nicholas Burger and Lambert, {Michael Ian} and Harry Hall and Sharief Hendricks",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/02640414.2018.1482590",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "74--81",
journal = "Journal of Sports Sciences",
issn = "0264-0414",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

Assessing tackle performance using a novel collision sport simulator in comparison to a “live” one-on-one tackling drill. / Burger, Nicholas; Lambert, Michael Ian; Hall, Harry; Hendricks, Sharief.

In: Journal of Sports Sciences, Vol. 37, No. 1, 02.01.2019, p. 74-81.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing tackle performance using a novel collision sport simulator in comparison to a “live” one-on-one tackling drill

AU - Burger,Nicholas

AU - Lambert,Michael Ian

AU - Hall,Harry

AU - Hendricks,Sharief

PY - 2019/1/2

Y1 - 2019/1/2

N2 - It is necessary to study the rugby tackle as it is associated with successful performance outcomes and is responsible for the majority of contact injuries. A novel collision sport simulator was developed to study tackle performance. The main aim of this validation study was to assess tackle technique performance between two different conditions: simulator versus a standardised one-on-one tackle drill previously used to assess technique. Tackling proficiency was assessed using a list of technical criteria. Mean scores, standard deviations and Cohen’s d effect sizes were calculated. Mean overall score for dynamic i.e. running simulator tackles was 7.78 (95%CI 7.58–7.99) (out of 9) or 87% (standard deviation or SD±8.94), and mean overall score for dynamic “live” tackles was 7.85 (95%CI 7.57–8.13) (out of 9) or 87% (SD±9.60) (effect size = 0.08; trivial; p > 0.05). Mean overall score for static i.e. standing simulator tackles was 7.45 (95%CI 7.20–7.69) (out of 9) or 83% (SD±10.71), and mean overall score for static “live” tackles was 8.05 (95%CI 7.83–8.27) (out of 9) or 89% (SD±7.53) (effect size = 0.72; moderate; p < 0.001). The simulator replicates dynamic tackle technique comparable to real-life tackle drills. It may be used for research analysing various aspects of the tackle in rugby and other contact sports.

AB - It is necessary to study the rugby tackle as it is associated with successful performance outcomes and is responsible for the majority of contact injuries. A novel collision sport simulator was developed to study tackle performance. The main aim of this validation study was to assess tackle technique performance between two different conditions: simulator versus a standardised one-on-one tackle drill previously used to assess technique. Tackling proficiency was assessed using a list of technical criteria. Mean scores, standard deviations and Cohen’s d effect sizes were calculated. Mean overall score for dynamic i.e. running simulator tackles was 7.78 (95%CI 7.58–7.99) (out of 9) or 87% (standard deviation or SD±8.94), and mean overall score for dynamic “live” tackles was 7.85 (95%CI 7.57–8.13) (out of 9) or 87% (SD±9.60) (effect size = 0.08; trivial; p > 0.05). Mean overall score for static i.e. standing simulator tackles was 7.45 (95%CI 7.20–7.69) (out of 9) or 83% (SD±10.71), and mean overall score for static “live” tackles was 8.05 (95%CI 7.83–8.27) (out of 9) or 89% (SD±7.53) (effect size = 0.72; moderate; p < 0.001). The simulator replicates dynamic tackle technique comparable to real-life tackle drills. It may be used for research analysing various aspects of the tackle in rugby and other contact sports.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85048361838&origin=inward

U2 - 10.1080/02640414.2018.1482590

DO - 10.1080/02640414.2018.1482590

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 74

EP - 81

JO - Journal of Sports Sciences

T2 - Journal of Sports Sciences

JF - Journal of Sports Sciences

SN - 0264-0414

IS - 1

ER -