Boys’ and Girls’ Perceptions of Peers in Middle Childhood: Differences and Similarities

Walter Matthys, Peggy Cohen-Kettenis, Judith Berkhout

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Gender differences and similarities in children’s person perception in middle childhood were studied. Free descriptions of a same-sex liked peer written by third to sixth grade boys (N = 254) and girls (N = 254) were studied from a cognitive-developmental perspective and with regard to content. Boys’ and girls’ descriptions did not differ in egocentrism, level of abstraction, or level of organization. Girls’ descriptions, however, were cognitively more complex (i.e., more diverse in content). This might be related to girls’ more intense dyadic forms of relationships with liked peers. Content analysis revealed that boys tend to focus on the peers themselves (content categories: Achievements, preferences and aversions, personality characteristics) as distinct from their environment, whereas girls tend to perceive their liked peers as embedded in their contexts (background information, family, and kinship). This difference seems to reflect the more instrumental character of boys’ relationships with peers and the more personalized character of girls’ relationships.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)15-24
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Genetic Psychology
Volume155
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 1994

Cite this

@article{c6b41baf4e2c42fd8d580aeb86840f74,
title = "Boys’ and Girls’ Perceptions of Peers in Middle Childhood: Differences and Similarities",
abstract = "Gender differences and similarities in children’s person perception in middle childhood were studied. Free descriptions of a same-sex liked peer written by third to sixth grade boys (N = 254) and girls (N = 254) were studied from a cognitive-developmental perspective and with regard to content. Boys’ and girls’ descriptions did not differ in egocentrism, level of abstraction, or level of organization. Girls’ descriptions, however, were cognitively more complex (i.e., more diverse in content). This might be related to girls’ more intense dyadic forms of relationships with liked peers. Content analysis revealed that boys tend to focus on the peers themselves (content categories: Achievements, preferences and aversions, personality characteristics) as distinct from their environment, whereas girls tend to perceive their liked peers as embedded in their contexts (background information, family, and kinship). This difference seems to reflect the more instrumental character of boys’ relationships with peers and the more personalized character of girls’ relationships.",
author = "Walter Matthys and Peggy Cohen-Kettenis and Judith Berkhout",
year = "1994",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/00221325.1994.9914754",
language = "English",
volume = "155",
pages = "15--24",
journal = "Journal of Genetic Psychology",
issn = "0022-1325",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

Boys’ and Girls’ Perceptions of Peers in Middle Childhood : Differences and Similarities. / Matthys, Walter; Cohen-Kettenis, Peggy; Berkhout, Judith.

In: Journal of Genetic Psychology, Vol. 155, No. 1, 01.01.1994, p. 15-24.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Boys’ and Girls’ Perceptions of Peers in Middle Childhood

T2 - Differences and Similarities

AU - Matthys, Walter

AU - Cohen-Kettenis, Peggy

AU - Berkhout, Judith

PY - 1994/1/1

Y1 - 1994/1/1

N2 - Gender differences and similarities in children’s person perception in middle childhood were studied. Free descriptions of a same-sex liked peer written by third to sixth grade boys (N = 254) and girls (N = 254) were studied from a cognitive-developmental perspective and with regard to content. Boys’ and girls’ descriptions did not differ in egocentrism, level of abstraction, or level of organization. Girls’ descriptions, however, were cognitively more complex (i.e., more diverse in content). This might be related to girls’ more intense dyadic forms of relationships with liked peers. Content analysis revealed that boys tend to focus on the peers themselves (content categories: Achievements, preferences and aversions, personality characteristics) as distinct from their environment, whereas girls tend to perceive their liked peers as embedded in their contexts (background information, family, and kinship). This difference seems to reflect the more instrumental character of boys’ relationships with peers and the more personalized character of girls’ relationships.

AB - Gender differences and similarities in children’s person perception in middle childhood were studied. Free descriptions of a same-sex liked peer written by third to sixth grade boys (N = 254) and girls (N = 254) were studied from a cognitive-developmental perspective and with regard to content. Boys’ and girls’ descriptions did not differ in egocentrism, level of abstraction, or level of organization. Girls’ descriptions, however, were cognitively more complex (i.e., more diverse in content). This might be related to girls’ more intense dyadic forms of relationships with liked peers. Content analysis revealed that boys tend to focus on the peers themselves (content categories: Achievements, preferences and aversions, personality characteristics) as distinct from their environment, whereas girls tend to perceive their liked peers as embedded in their contexts (background information, family, and kinship). This difference seems to reflect the more instrumental character of boys’ relationships with peers and the more personalized character of girls’ relationships.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028393934&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00221325.1994.9914754

DO - 10.1080/00221325.1994.9914754

M3 - Article

VL - 155

SP - 15

EP - 24

JO - Journal of Genetic Psychology

JF - Journal of Genetic Psychology

SN - 0022-1325

IS - 1

ER -