Broadening the scope of feedback to promote its relevance to workplace learning

Renée M. van der Leeuw, Pim W. Teunissen, Cees P. M. van der Vleuten

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The common goal in medical education is to support the health care workforce, both present and future, in becoming and remaining competent professionals. Both during and after medical training, learning takes place in the clinical workplace. Yet, how feedback is defined in medical education and how it is practiced in clinical training situations, combined with a research focus on “what works,” limits its potential for learning. This article explores the theoretical background of learning in interaction and current trends in medical education to broaden the scope of feedback and promote its relevance to workplace learning. A new, wider perspective is outlined in which feedback could be redefined as “performance-relevant information” (PRI). PRI can incorporate all information that is deemed relevant to the learner, drawn from interaction in workplace learning and one's interpretation of performance in the clinical workplace. This information can, for example, come from the evaluation of patient outcomes after treatment; observations of role models' performance; evaluations and assessments; exploring feelings of failure or success; and responses of colleagues and peers. PRI draws attention to learning opportunities that better fit the highly social learning of clinical workplaces and current trends in medical education. It supports the interpretation of individual or team performance in terms of relevance to learning. This allows for a comprehensive way of viewing and stimulating workplace learning and the performance of professionals, providing an opportunity to create lifelong learning strategies and potentially improving the care of patients.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)556-559
JournalAcademic Medicine
Volume93
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Cite this

@article{4ddbc0476f8f4167a8220a8e26e5a01e,
title = "Broadening the scope of feedback to promote its relevance to workplace learning",
abstract = "The common goal in medical education is to support the health care workforce, both present and future, in becoming and remaining competent professionals. Both during and after medical training, learning takes place in the clinical workplace. Yet, how feedback is defined in medical education and how it is practiced in clinical training situations, combined with a research focus on “what works,” limits its potential for learning. This article explores the theoretical background of learning in interaction and current trends in medical education to broaden the scope of feedback and promote its relevance to workplace learning. A new, wider perspective is outlined in which feedback could be redefined as “performance-relevant information” (PRI). PRI can incorporate all information that is deemed relevant to the learner, drawn from interaction in workplace learning and one's interpretation of performance in the clinical workplace. This information can, for example, come from the evaluation of patient outcomes after treatment; observations of role models' performance; evaluations and assessments; exploring feelings of failure or success; and responses of colleagues and peers. PRI draws attention to learning opportunities that better fit the highly social learning of clinical workplaces and current trends in medical education. It supports the interpretation of individual or team performance in terms of relevance to learning. This allows for a comprehensive way of viewing and stimulating workplace learning and the performance of professionals, providing an opportunity to create lifelong learning strategies and potentially improving the care of patients.",
author = "{van der Leeuw}, {Ren{\'e}e M.} and Teunissen, {Pim W.} and {van der Vleuten}, {Cees P. M.}",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1097/ACM.0000000000001962",
language = "English",
volume = "93",
pages = "556--559",
journal = "Academic Medicine",
issn = "1040-2446",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

Broadening the scope of feedback to promote its relevance to workplace learning. / van der Leeuw, Renée M.; Teunissen, Pim W.; van der Vleuten, Cees P. M.

In: Academic Medicine, Vol. 93, No. 4, 2018, p. 556-559.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Broadening the scope of feedback to promote its relevance to workplace learning

AU - van der Leeuw, Renée M.

AU - Teunissen, Pim W.

AU - van der Vleuten, Cees P. M.

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - The common goal in medical education is to support the health care workforce, both present and future, in becoming and remaining competent professionals. Both during and after medical training, learning takes place in the clinical workplace. Yet, how feedback is defined in medical education and how it is practiced in clinical training situations, combined with a research focus on “what works,” limits its potential for learning. This article explores the theoretical background of learning in interaction and current trends in medical education to broaden the scope of feedback and promote its relevance to workplace learning. A new, wider perspective is outlined in which feedback could be redefined as “performance-relevant information” (PRI). PRI can incorporate all information that is deemed relevant to the learner, drawn from interaction in workplace learning and one's interpretation of performance in the clinical workplace. This information can, for example, come from the evaluation of patient outcomes after treatment; observations of role models' performance; evaluations and assessments; exploring feelings of failure or success; and responses of colleagues and peers. PRI draws attention to learning opportunities that better fit the highly social learning of clinical workplaces and current trends in medical education. It supports the interpretation of individual or team performance in terms of relevance to learning. This allows for a comprehensive way of viewing and stimulating workplace learning and the performance of professionals, providing an opportunity to create lifelong learning strategies and potentially improving the care of patients.

AB - The common goal in medical education is to support the health care workforce, both present and future, in becoming and remaining competent professionals. Both during and after medical training, learning takes place in the clinical workplace. Yet, how feedback is defined in medical education and how it is practiced in clinical training situations, combined with a research focus on “what works,” limits its potential for learning. This article explores the theoretical background of learning in interaction and current trends in medical education to broaden the scope of feedback and promote its relevance to workplace learning. A new, wider perspective is outlined in which feedback could be redefined as “performance-relevant information” (PRI). PRI can incorporate all information that is deemed relevant to the learner, drawn from interaction in workplace learning and one's interpretation of performance in the clinical workplace. This information can, for example, come from the evaluation of patient outcomes after treatment; observations of role models' performance; evaluations and assessments; exploring feelings of failure or success; and responses of colleagues and peers. PRI draws attention to learning opportunities that better fit the highly social learning of clinical workplaces and current trends in medical education. It supports the interpretation of individual or team performance in terms of relevance to learning. This allows for a comprehensive way of viewing and stimulating workplace learning and the performance of professionals, providing an opportunity to create lifelong learning strategies and potentially improving the care of patients.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85054523944&origin=inward

UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29068817

U2 - 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001962

DO - 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001962

M3 - Article

VL - 93

SP - 556

EP - 559

JO - Academic Medicine

JF - Academic Medicine

SN - 1040-2446

IS - 4

ER -