Can We Use the Intrinsic Left Ventricular Delay (QLV) to Optimize the Pacing Configuration for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy With a Quadripolar Left Ventricular Lead?

Wouter M van Everdingen, Alwin Zweerink, Maarten J Cramer, Pieter A Doevendans, Uyên Châu Nguyên, Albert C van Rossum, Frits W Prinzen, Kevin Vernooy, Cornelis P Allaart, Mathias Meine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies indicated the importance of the intrinsic left ventricular (LV) electric delay (QLV) for optimal benefit to cardiac resynchronization therapy. We investigated the use of QLV for achieving optimal acute hemodynamic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy with a quadripolar LV lead.

METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-eight heart failure patients with a left bundle branch block were prospectively enrolled (31 men; age, 66±10 years; LV ejection fraction, 28±8%; QRS duration, 176±14 ms). Immediately after cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation, invasive LV pressure-volume loops were recorded during biventricular pacing with each separate electrode at 4 atrioventricular delays. Acute cardiac resynchronization therapy response, measured as change in stroke work (Δ%SW) compared with intrinsic conduction, was related to intrinsic interval between Q on the ECG and LV sensing delay (QLV), normalized for QRS duration (QLV/QRSd), and electrode position. QLV/QRSd was 84±9% and variation between the 4 electrodes 9±5%. Δ%SW was 89±64% and varied by 39±36% between the electrodes. In univariate analysis, an anterolateral or lateral electrode position and a high QLV/QRSd had a significant association with a large Δ%SW (all P <0.01). In a combined model, only QLV/QRSd remained significantly associated with Δ%SW (P<0.05). However, a direct relation between QLV/QRSd and Δ%SW was only seen in 24 patients, whereas 24 patients showed an inverse relation.

CONCLUSIONS: The large variation in acute hemodynamic response indicates that the choice of the stimulated electrode on a quadripolar lead is important. Although QLV/QRSd was associated with acute hemodynamic response at group level, it cannot be used to select the optimal electrode in the individual patient.

LanguageEnglish
Pagese005912
JournalCirculation. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
Volume11
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2018

Cite this

van Everdingen, Wouter M ; Zweerink, Alwin ; Cramer, Maarten J ; Doevendans, Pieter A ; Nguyên, Uyên Châu ; van Rossum, Albert C ; Prinzen, Frits W ; Vernooy, Kevin ; Allaart, Cornelis P ; Meine, Mathias. / Can We Use the Intrinsic Left Ventricular Delay (QLV) to Optimize the Pacing Configuration for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy With a Quadripolar Left Ventricular Lead?. In: Circulation. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. 2018 ; Vol. 11, No. 3. pp. e005912.
@article{2def52b9068f414f86a24b6ebe59ef03,
title = "Can We Use the Intrinsic Left Ventricular Delay (QLV) to Optimize the Pacing Configuration for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy With a Quadripolar Left Ventricular Lead?",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Previous studies indicated the importance of the intrinsic left ventricular (LV) electric delay (QLV) for optimal benefit to cardiac resynchronization therapy. We investigated the use of QLV for achieving optimal acute hemodynamic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy with a quadripolar LV lead.METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-eight heart failure patients with a left bundle branch block were prospectively enrolled (31 men; age, 66±10 years; LV ejection fraction, 28±8{\%}; QRS duration, 176±14 ms). Immediately after cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation, invasive LV pressure-volume loops were recorded during biventricular pacing with each separate electrode at 4 atrioventricular delays. Acute cardiac resynchronization therapy response, measured as change in stroke work (Δ{\%}SW) compared with intrinsic conduction, was related to intrinsic interval between Q on the ECG and LV sensing delay (QLV), normalized for QRS duration (QLV/QRSd), and electrode position. QLV/QRSd was 84±9{\%} and variation between the 4 electrodes 9±5{\%}. Δ{\%}SW was 89±64{\%} and varied by 39±36{\%} between the electrodes. In univariate analysis, an anterolateral or lateral electrode position and a high QLV/QRSd had a significant association with a large Δ{\%}SW (all P <0.01). In a combined model, only QLV/QRSd remained significantly associated with Δ{\%}SW (P<0.05). However, a direct relation between QLV/QRSd and Δ{\%}SW was only seen in 24 patients, whereas 24 patients showed an inverse relation.CONCLUSIONS: The large variation in acute hemodynamic response indicates that the choice of the stimulated electrode on a quadripolar lead is important. Although QLV/QRSd was associated with acute hemodynamic response at group level, it cannot be used to select the optimal electrode in the individual patient.",
author = "{van Everdingen}, {Wouter M} and Alwin Zweerink and Cramer, {Maarten J} and Doevendans, {Pieter A} and Nguy{\^e}n, {Uy{\^e}n Ch{\^a}u} and {van Rossum}, {Albert C} and Prinzen, {Frits W} and Kevin Vernooy and Allaart, {Cornelis P} and Mathias Meine",
note = "{\circledC} 2018 American Heart Association, Inc.",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1161/CIRCEP.117.005912",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "e005912",
journal = "Circulation. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology",
issn = "1941-3149",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

Can We Use the Intrinsic Left Ventricular Delay (QLV) to Optimize the Pacing Configuration for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy With a Quadripolar Left Ventricular Lead? / van Everdingen, Wouter M; Zweerink, Alwin; Cramer, Maarten J; Doevendans, Pieter A; Nguyên, Uyên Châu; van Rossum, Albert C; Prinzen, Frits W; Vernooy, Kevin; Allaart, Cornelis P; Meine, Mathias.

In: Circulation. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, Vol. 11, No. 3, 03.2018, p. e005912.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can We Use the Intrinsic Left Ventricular Delay (QLV) to Optimize the Pacing Configuration for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy With a Quadripolar Left Ventricular Lead?

AU - van Everdingen, Wouter M

AU - Zweerink, Alwin

AU - Cramer, Maarten J

AU - Doevendans, Pieter A

AU - Nguyên, Uyên Châu

AU - van Rossum, Albert C

AU - Prinzen, Frits W

AU - Vernooy, Kevin

AU - Allaart, Cornelis P

AU - Meine, Mathias

N1 - © 2018 American Heart Association, Inc.

PY - 2018/3

Y1 - 2018/3

N2 - BACKGROUND: Previous studies indicated the importance of the intrinsic left ventricular (LV) electric delay (QLV) for optimal benefit to cardiac resynchronization therapy. We investigated the use of QLV for achieving optimal acute hemodynamic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy with a quadripolar LV lead.METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-eight heart failure patients with a left bundle branch block were prospectively enrolled (31 men; age, 66±10 years; LV ejection fraction, 28±8%; QRS duration, 176±14 ms). Immediately after cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation, invasive LV pressure-volume loops were recorded during biventricular pacing with each separate electrode at 4 atrioventricular delays. Acute cardiac resynchronization therapy response, measured as change in stroke work (Δ%SW) compared with intrinsic conduction, was related to intrinsic interval between Q on the ECG and LV sensing delay (QLV), normalized for QRS duration (QLV/QRSd), and electrode position. QLV/QRSd was 84±9% and variation between the 4 electrodes 9±5%. Δ%SW was 89±64% and varied by 39±36% between the electrodes. In univariate analysis, an anterolateral or lateral electrode position and a high QLV/QRSd had a significant association with a large Δ%SW (all P <0.01). In a combined model, only QLV/QRSd remained significantly associated with Δ%SW (P<0.05). However, a direct relation between QLV/QRSd and Δ%SW was only seen in 24 patients, whereas 24 patients showed an inverse relation.CONCLUSIONS: The large variation in acute hemodynamic response indicates that the choice of the stimulated electrode on a quadripolar lead is important. Although QLV/QRSd was associated with acute hemodynamic response at group level, it cannot be used to select the optimal electrode in the individual patient.

AB - BACKGROUND: Previous studies indicated the importance of the intrinsic left ventricular (LV) electric delay (QLV) for optimal benefit to cardiac resynchronization therapy. We investigated the use of QLV for achieving optimal acute hemodynamic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy with a quadripolar LV lead.METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-eight heart failure patients with a left bundle branch block were prospectively enrolled (31 men; age, 66±10 years; LV ejection fraction, 28±8%; QRS duration, 176±14 ms). Immediately after cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation, invasive LV pressure-volume loops were recorded during biventricular pacing with each separate electrode at 4 atrioventricular delays. Acute cardiac resynchronization therapy response, measured as change in stroke work (Δ%SW) compared with intrinsic conduction, was related to intrinsic interval between Q on the ECG and LV sensing delay (QLV), normalized for QRS duration (QLV/QRSd), and electrode position. QLV/QRSd was 84±9% and variation between the 4 electrodes 9±5%. Δ%SW was 89±64% and varied by 39±36% between the electrodes. In univariate analysis, an anterolateral or lateral electrode position and a high QLV/QRSd had a significant association with a large Δ%SW (all P <0.01). In a combined model, only QLV/QRSd remained significantly associated with Δ%SW (P<0.05). However, a direct relation between QLV/QRSd and Δ%SW was only seen in 24 patients, whereas 24 patients showed an inverse relation.CONCLUSIONS: The large variation in acute hemodynamic response indicates that the choice of the stimulated electrode on a quadripolar lead is important. Although QLV/QRSd was associated with acute hemodynamic response at group level, it cannot be used to select the optimal electrode in the individual patient.

U2 - 10.1161/CIRCEP.117.005912

DO - 10.1161/CIRCEP.117.005912

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - e005912

JO - Circulation. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology

T2 - Circulation. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology

JF - Circulation. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology

SN - 1941-3149

IS - 3

ER -