TY - JOUR
T1 - Cardiac output measured by uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis by recently released software version 3.02 versus thermodilution in septic shock
AU - Slagt, Cornelis
AU - De Leeuw, Marcel A.
AU - Beute, Jan
AU - Rijnsburger, Emmy
AU - Hoeksema, Martijn
AU - Mulder, Jan W.R.
AU - Malagon, Ignacio
AU - Groeneveld, A. B.Johan
PY - 2013/4
Y1 - 2013/4
N2 - To evaluate the 3.02 software version of the FloTrac/Vigileo™ system for estimation of cardiac output by uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis, in septic shock. Nineteen consecutive patients in septic shock were studied. FloTrac/Vigileo™ measurements (COfv) were compared with pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution-derived cardiac output (COtd). The mean cardiac output was 7.7 L min-1 and measurements correlated at r = 0.53 (P < 0.001, n = 314). In Bland-Altman plot for repeated measurements, the bias was 1.7 L min-1 and 95 % limits of agreement (LA) were -3.0 to 6.5 L min-1, with a %error of 53 %. The bias of COfv inversely related to systemic vascular resistance (SVR) (r = -0.54, P < 0.001). Above a SVR of 700 dyn s cm-5 (n = 74), bias was 0.3 L min-1 and 95 % LA were -1.6 to 2.2 L min-1 (%error 32 %). Changes between consecutive measurements (n = 295) correlated at 0.67 (P < 0.001), with a bias of 0.1 % (95 % limits of agreement -17.5 to 17.0 %). All changes >10 % in both COtd and COfv (n = 46) were in the same direction. Eighty-five percent of the measurements were within the 30 -330 of the polar axis. COfv with the latest software still underestimates COtd at low SVR in septic shock. The tracking capacities of the 3.02 software are moderate-good when clinically relevant changes are considered.
AB - To evaluate the 3.02 software version of the FloTrac/Vigileo™ system for estimation of cardiac output by uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis, in septic shock. Nineteen consecutive patients in septic shock were studied. FloTrac/Vigileo™ measurements (COfv) were compared with pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution-derived cardiac output (COtd). The mean cardiac output was 7.7 L min-1 and measurements correlated at r = 0.53 (P < 0.001, n = 314). In Bland-Altman plot for repeated measurements, the bias was 1.7 L min-1 and 95 % limits of agreement (LA) were -3.0 to 6.5 L min-1, with a %error of 53 %. The bias of COfv inversely related to systemic vascular resistance (SVR) (r = -0.54, P < 0.001). Above a SVR of 700 dyn s cm-5 (n = 74), bias was 0.3 L min-1 and 95 % LA were -1.6 to 2.2 L min-1 (%error 32 %). Changes between consecutive measurements (n = 295) correlated at 0.67 (P < 0.001), with a bias of 0.1 % (95 % limits of agreement -17.5 to 17.0 %). All changes >10 % in both COtd and COfv (n = 46) were in the same direction. Eighty-five percent of the measurements were within the 30 -330 of the polar axis. COfv with the latest software still underestimates COtd at low SVR in septic shock. The tracking capacities of the 3.02 software are moderate-good when clinically relevant changes are considered.
KW - Arterial pressure waveform analysis without calibration
KW - Cardiac output
KW - Septic shock
KW - Thermodilution cardiac output
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84879552284&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10877-012-9410-9
DO - 10.1007/s10877-012-9410-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 23154918
AN - SCOPUS:84879552284
SN - 1387-1307
VL - 27
SP - 171
EP - 177
JO - Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
JF - Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
IS - 2
ER -