Cellular drug resistance profiles that might explain the prognostic value of immunophenotype and age in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia

R. Pieters*, G. J.L. Kaspers, E. R. Van Wering, D. R. Huismans, A. M. Loonen, K. Hählen, A. J.P. Veerman

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Immunophenotype and age have prognostic value in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) but how this operates is not understood. In 84 children with ALL at initial diagnosis we studied the correlation between these factors and the in vitro resistance to eight drugs, determined with the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl-2, 5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. B-lineage ALL samples were classified into four differentiation stages: the CD10- proB ALL; CALL; preB ALL with cytoplasmic μ positive ALL cells; and B-ALL with surface immunoglobulin-positive (Ig+) cells. cALL and preB ALL cases have the best prognosis; proB and T-ALL cases show a worse prognosis and B-ALL the poorest prognosis. Patients aged <18 months and >10 years have a poor prognosis compared to patients in the intermediate age group. Our results show that CALL and preB ALL cells were the most drug-sensitive cells compared to the other phenotypes. No differences were found between cALL and preB ALL cases with the exception that preB cells were more sensitive to mustine and mafosfamide (Maf). Compared to cALL and preB ALL cases, T-ALL cases were significantly more resistant to prednisolone (Pred), daunorubicin (DNR), L-asparaginase (L-Asp), cytosine arabinoside (AraC), and Maf; proB ALL cases were more resistant to Pred, DNR, L-Asp, and 6-thioguanine. The three B-ALL cases were resistant to vincristine and DNR. Two out of three B-ALL were resistant to Pred. Compared to cells from patients aged 18 months to 10 years, cells from children <18 months were more resistant to Pred and DNR; cells from children >10 years were more resistant to Pred. We conclude that cellular drug-resistance patterns might at least partly explain the prognostic value of immunophenotype and age in childhood ALL.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)392-397
Number of pages6
JournalLeukemia
Volume7
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Mar 1993

Cite this