Abstract
Objective: To investigate if cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) adds to the predictive value of umbilical artery pulsatility index (UA PI) alone – standard of practice – for adverse perinatal outcome in singleton pregnancies. Design and setting: Meta-analysis based on individual participant data (IPD). Population or sample: Ten centres provided 17 data sets for 21 661 participants, 18 731 of which could be included. Sample sizes per data set ranged from 207 to 9215 individuals. Patient populations varied from uncomplicated to complicated pregnancies. Methods: In a collaborative, pooled analysis, we compared the prognostic value of combining CPR with UA PI, versus UA PI only and CPR only, with a one-stage IPD approach. After multiple imputation of missing values, we used multilevel multivariable logistic regression to develop prediction models. We evaluated the classification performance of all models with receiver operating characteristics analysis. We performed subgroup analyses according to gestational age, birthweight centile and estimated fetal weight centile. Main outcome measures: Composite adverse perinatal outcome, defined as perinatal death, caesarean section for fetal distress or neonatal unit admission. Results: Adverse outcomes occurred in 3423 (18%) participants. The model with UA PI alone resulted in an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.775 (95% CI 0.709–0.828) and with CPR alone in an AUC of 0.778 (95% CI 0.715–0.831). Addition of CPR to the UA PI model resulted in an increase in the AUC of 0.003 points (0.778, 95% CI 0.714–0.831). These results were consistent across all subgroups. Conclusions: Cerebroplacental ratio added no predictive value for adverse perinatal outcome beyond UA PI, when assessing singleton pregnancies, irrespective of gestational age or fetal size. Tweetable abstract: Doppler measurement of cerebroplacental ratio in clinical practice has limited added predictive value to umbilical artery alone.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 226-235 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology |
Volume | 128 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jan 2021 |
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver
}
Cerebroplacental ratio in predicting adverse perinatal outcome : a meta-analysis of individual participant data. / Vollgraff Heidweiller-Schreurs, C. A.; van Osch, I. R.; Heymans, M. W. et al.
In: BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vol. 128, No. 2, 01.2021, p. 226-235.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - Cerebroplacental ratio in predicting adverse perinatal outcome
T2 - a meta-analysis of individual participant data
AU - Vollgraff Heidweiller-Schreurs, C. A.
AU - van Osch, I. R.
AU - Heymans, M. W.
AU - Ganzevoort, W.
AU - Schoonmade, L. J.
AU - Bax, C. J.
AU - Mol, B. W.J.
AU - de Groot, C. J.M.
AU - Bossuyt, P. M.M.
AU - de Boer, M. A.
AU - Khalil, Asma
AU - Thilaganathan, Basky
AU - Turan, Ozhan M.
AU - Crimmins, Sarah
AU - Harman, Chris
AU - Shannon, Alisson M.
AU - Kumar, Sailesh
AU - Dicker, Patrick
AU - Malone, Fergal
AU - Tully, Elizabeth C.
AU - Unterscheider, Julia
AU - Crippa, Isabella
AU - Ghidini, Alessandro
AU - Roncaglia, Nadia
AU - Vergani, Patrizia
AU - Bhide, Amarnath
AU - D'Antonio, Francesco
AU - Pilu, Gianluigi
AU - Galindo, Alberto
AU - Herraiz, Ignacio
AU - Vázquez-Sarandeses, Alicia
AU - Ebbing, Cathrine
AU - Johnsen, Synnøve L.
AU - Karlsen, Henriette O.
AU - the CPR IPD Study Group
N1 - Funding Information: We would like thank Dr F. Figueras, Prof. E. Gratac?s, Dr F. Crispi and Dr J. Miranda for sharing data for this project. The CPR IPD Study Group: Asma Khalil (Fetal Medicine Unit, St George?s Hospital Medical School and St George?s University of London, London, UK; Vascular Biology Research Centre, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St George?s University of London, London, UK), Basky Thilaganathan (Fetal Medicine Unit, St George?s Hospital Medical School and St George?s University of London, London, UK; Vascular Biology Research Centre, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St George?s University of London, London, UK), Ozhan M Turan (Departments of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA), Sarah Crimmins (Departments of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA), Chris Harman (Departments of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA), Alisson M Shannon (Departments of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA), Sailesh Kumar (School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; Mater Research Institute ? University of Queensland, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia), Patrick Dicker (Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland), Fergal Malone (Departments of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland), Elizabeth C Tully (Departments of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland), Julia Unterscheider (Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine, The Royal Women?s Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia), Isabella Crippa (Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy), Alessandro Ghidini (Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy), Nadia Roncaglia (Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy), Patrizia Vergani (Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy), Amarnath Bhide (Fetal Medicine Unit, St George?s Hospital Medical School and St George?s University of London, London, UK), Francesco D'Antonio (Fetal Medicine Unit, St George?s Hospital Medical School and St George?s University of London, London, UK), Gianluigi Pilu (Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy), Alberto Galindo (Fetal Medicine Unit-SAMID, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, 12 de Octubre Research Institute (imas12), Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain), Ignacio Herraiz (Fetal Medicine Unit-SAMID, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, 12 de Octubre Research Institute (imas12), Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain), Alicia V?zquez-Sarandeses (Fetal Medicine Unit-SAMID, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, 12 de Octubre Research Institute (imas12), Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain), Cathrine Ebbing (Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway), Synn?ve L Johnsen (Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway), Henriette O Karlsen (Research Group for Pregnancy, Fetal Development and Birth, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway). Funding Information: BWM reports grants from NHMRC and personal fees from ObsEva, Merck Merck KGaA, Guerbet and iGenomix outside the submitted work. The other authors report no disclosures of interest. Completed disclosure of interest forms are available to view online as supporting information. Publisher Copyright: © 2020 The Authors. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
PY - 2021/1
Y1 - 2021/1
N2 - Objective: To investigate if cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) adds to the predictive value of umbilical artery pulsatility index (UA PI) alone – standard of practice – for adverse perinatal outcome in singleton pregnancies. Design and setting: Meta-analysis based on individual participant data (IPD). Population or sample: Ten centres provided 17 data sets for 21 661 participants, 18 731 of which could be included. Sample sizes per data set ranged from 207 to 9215 individuals. Patient populations varied from uncomplicated to complicated pregnancies. Methods: In a collaborative, pooled analysis, we compared the prognostic value of combining CPR with UA PI, versus UA PI only and CPR only, with a one-stage IPD approach. After multiple imputation of missing values, we used multilevel multivariable logistic regression to develop prediction models. We evaluated the classification performance of all models with receiver operating characteristics analysis. We performed subgroup analyses according to gestational age, birthweight centile and estimated fetal weight centile. Main outcome measures: Composite adverse perinatal outcome, defined as perinatal death, caesarean section for fetal distress or neonatal unit admission. Results: Adverse outcomes occurred in 3423 (18%) participants. The model with UA PI alone resulted in an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.775 (95% CI 0.709–0.828) and with CPR alone in an AUC of 0.778 (95% CI 0.715–0.831). Addition of CPR to the UA PI model resulted in an increase in the AUC of 0.003 points (0.778, 95% CI 0.714–0.831). These results were consistent across all subgroups. Conclusions: Cerebroplacental ratio added no predictive value for adverse perinatal outcome beyond UA PI, when assessing singleton pregnancies, irrespective of gestational age or fetal size. Tweetable abstract: Doppler measurement of cerebroplacental ratio in clinical practice has limited added predictive value to umbilical artery alone.
AB - Objective: To investigate if cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) adds to the predictive value of umbilical artery pulsatility index (UA PI) alone – standard of practice – for adverse perinatal outcome in singleton pregnancies. Design and setting: Meta-analysis based on individual participant data (IPD). Population or sample: Ten centres provided 17 data sets for 21 661 participants, 18 731 of which could be included. Sample sizes per data set ranged from 207 to 9215 individuals. Patient populations varied from uncomplicated to complicated pregnancies. Methods: In a collaborative, pooled analysis, we compared the prognostic value of combining CPR with UA PI, versus UA PI only and CPR only, with a one-stage IPD approach. After multiple imputation of missing values, we used multilevel multivariable logistic regression to develop prediction models. We evaluated the classification performance of all models with receiver operating characteristics analysis. We performed subgroup analyses according to gestational age, birthweight centile and estimated fetal weight centile. Main outcome measures: Composite adverse perinatal outcome, defined as perinatal death, caesarean section for fetal distress or neonatal unit admission. Results: Adverse outcomes occurred in 3423 (18%) participants. The model with UA PI alone resulted in an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.775 (95% CI 0.709–0.828) and with CPR alone in an AUC of 0.778 (95% CI 0.715–0.831). Addition of CPR to the UA PI model resulted in an increase in the AUC of 0.003 points (0.778, 95% CI 0.714–0.831). These results were consistent across all subgroups. Conclusions: Cerebroplacental ratio added no predictive value for adverse perinatal outcome beyond UA PI, when assessing singleton pregnancies, irrespective of gestational age or fetal size. Tweetable abstract: Doppler measurement of cerebroplacental ratio in clinical practice has limited added predictive value to umbilical artery alone.
KW - Cerebroplacental ratio
KW - Doppler
KW - fetal growth restriction
KW - individual participant data
KW - meta-analysis
KW - middle cerebral artery
KW - prognostic accuracy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85086119614&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/1471-0528.16287
DO - 10.1111/1471-0528.16287
M3 - Article
C2 - 32363701
AN - SCOPUS:85086119614
VL - 128
SP - 226
EP - 235
JO - BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
JF - BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
SN - 1470-0328
IS - 2
ER -