TY - JOUR
T1 - Circulating tumor DNA predicts outcome in metastatic gastroesophageal cancer
AU - van Velzen, Merel J. M.
AU - Creemers, Aafke
AU - van den Ende, Tom
AU - Schokker, Sandor
AU - Krausz, Sarah
AU - Reinten, Roy J.
AU - Dijk, Frederike
AU - van Noesel, Carel J. M.
AU - Halfwerk, Hans
AU - Meijer, Sybren L.
AU - Mearadji, Banafsche
AU - Derks, Sarah
AU - Bijlsma, Maarten F.
AU - van Laarhoven, Hanneke W. M.
N1 - Funding Information:
MFB received research funding from Celgene. Prof. dr. Hanneke W. M. van Laarhoven has served as a consultant for Celgene, Lilly, Nordic, and Philips, and has received unrestricted research funding from Bayer, Celgene, Lilly, Merck, Serono, MSD, Nordic, Philips and Roche. None of these parties were involved in the current study.
Funding Information:
This study was conducted with funding from the Nijbakker Morra Stichting and De Jonge Akademie Projectbeurs.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/9
Y1 - 2022/9
N2 - Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has predictive and prognostic value in localized and metastatic cancer. This study analyzed the prognostic value of baseline and on-treatment ctDNA in metastatic gastroesophageal cancer (mGEC) using a region-specific next generation sequencing (NGS) panel. Methods: Cell free DNA was isolated from plasma of patients before start of first-line palliative systemic treatment and after 9 and 18 weeks. Two NGS panels were designed comprising the most frequently mutated genes and targetable mutations in GEC. Tumor-derived mutations in matched metastatic biopsies were used to validate that the sequencing panels assessed true tumor-derived variants. Tumor volumes were calculated from baseline CT scans and correlated to variant allele frequency (VAF). Survival analyses were performed using univariable and multivariable Cox-regression analyses. Results: ctDNA was detected in pretreatment plasma in 75% of 72 patients and correlated well with mutations in metastatic biopsies (86% accordance). The VAF correlated with baseline tumor volume (Pearson’s R 0.53, p < 0.0001). Detection of multiple gene mutations at baseline in plasma was associated with worse overall survival (OS, HR 2.16, 95% CI 1.10–4.28; p = 0.027) and progression free survival (PFS, HR 2.71, 95% CI 1.28–5.73; p = 0.009). OS and PFS were inferior in patients with residual detectable ctDNA after 9 weeks of treatment (OS: HR 4.95, 95% CI 1.53–16.04; p = 0.008; PFS: HR 4.08, 95% CI 1.31–12.75; p = 0.016). Conclusion: Based on our NGS panel, the number of ctDNA mutations before start of first-line chemotherapy has prognostic value. Moreover, residual ctDNA after three cycles of systemic treatment is associated with inferior survival.
AB - Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has predictive and prognostic value in localized and metastatic cancer. This study analyzed the prognostic value of baseline and on-treatment ctDNA in metastatic gastroesophageal cancer (mGEC) using a region-specific next generation sequencing (NGS) panel. Methods: Cell free DNA was isolated from plasma of patients before start of first-line palliative systemic treatment and after 9 and 18 weeks. Two NGS panels were designed comprising the most frequently mutated genes and targetable mutations in GEC. Tumor-derived mutations in matched metastatic biopsies were used to validate that the sequencing panels assessed true tumor-derived variants. Tumor volumes were calculated from baseline CT scans and correlated to variant allele frequency (VAF). Survival analyses were performed using univariable and multivariable Cox-regression analyses. Results: ctDNA was detected in pretreatment plasma in 75% of 72 patients and correlated well with mutations in metastatic biopsies (86% accordance). The VAF correlated with baseline tumor volume (Pearson’s R 0.53, p < 0.0001). Detection of multiple gene mutations at baseline in plasma was associated with worse overall survival (OS, HR 2.16, 95% CI 1.10–4.28; p = 0.027) and progression free survival (PFS, HR 2.71, 95% CI 1.28–5.73; p = 0.009). OS and PFS were inferior in patients with residual detectable ctDNA after 9 weeks of treatment (OS: HR 4.95, 95% CI 1.53–16.04; p = 0.008; PFS: HR 4.08, 95% CI 1.31–12.75; p = 0.016). Conclusion: Based on our NGS panel, the number of ctDNA mutations before start of first-line chemotherapy has prognostic value. Moreover, residual ctDNA after three cycles of systemic treatment is associated with inferior survival.
KW - Circulating tumor DNA
KW - Gastroesophageal cancer
KW - Palliative treatment
KW - Predictive factor
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85132872806&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10120-022-01313-w
DO - 10.1007/s10120-022-01313-w
M3 - Article
C2 - 35763187
SN - 1436-3291
VL - 25
SP - 906
EP - 915
JO - Gastric Cancer
JF - Gastric Cancer
IS - 5
ER -