TY - JOUR
T1 - Circulating tumor DNA quantity is related to tumor volume and both predict survival in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
AU - Strijker, Marin
AU - Soer, Eline C.
AU - de Pastena, Matteo
AU - Creemers, Aafke
AU - Balduzzi, Alberto
AU - Beagan, Jamie J.
AU - Busch, Olivier R.
AU - van Delden, Otto M.
AU - Halfwerk, Hans
AU - van Hooft, Jeanin E.
AU - van Lienden, Krijn P.
AU - Marchegiani, Giovanni
AU - Meijer, Sybren L.
AU - van Noesel, Carel J.
AU - Reinten, Roy J.
AU - Roos, Eva
AU - Schokker, Sandor
AU - Verheij, Joanne
AU - van de Vijver, Marc J.
AU - Waasdorp, Cynthia
AU - Wilmink, Johanna W.
AU - Ylstra, Bauke
AU - Besselink, Marc G.
AU - Bijlsma, Maarten F.
AU - Dijk, Frederike
AU - van Laarhoven, Hanneke W.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors acknowledge Paul Eijk for helping set up droplet digital PCR at the VUmc Cancer Center Amsterdam and serving as the point of contact for researchers using the platform. This work was supported by the Dutch Cancer Society (KWF) grant to M.J.V., O.R.B. and H.W.L. (UVA 2014-6803).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Authors. International Journal of Cancer published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of UICC
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/3/1
Y1 - 2020/3/1
N2 - Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is assumed to reflect tumor burden and has been suggested as a tool for prognostication and follow-up in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC). However, the prognostic value of ctDNA and its relation with tumor burden has yet to be substantiated, especially in mPDAC. In this retrospective analysis of prospectively collected samples, cell-free DNA from plasma samples of 58 treatment-naive mPDAC patients was isolated and sequenced using a custom-made pancreatobiliary NGS panel. Pathogenic mutations were detected in 26/58 (44.8%) samples. Cross-check with droplet digital PCR showed good agreement in Bland–Altman analysis (p = 0.217, nonsignificance indicating good agreement). In patients with liver metastases, ctDNA was more frequently detected (24/37, p < 0.001). Tumor volume (3D reconstructions from imaging) and ctDNA variant allele frequency (VAF) were correlated (Spearman's ρ = 0.544, p < 0.001). Median overall survival (OS) was 3.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6–4.9) versus 8.4 (95% CI 1.6–15.1) months in patients with detectable versus undetectable ctDNA (p = 0.005). Both ctDNA VAF and tumor volume independently predicted OS after adjustment for carbohydrate antigen 19.9 and treatment regimen (hazard ratio [HR] 1.05, 95% CI 1.01–1.09, p = 0.005; HR 1.00, 95% CI 1.01–1.05, p = 0.003). In conclusion, our study showed that ctDNA detection rates are higher in patients with larger tumor volume and liver metastases. Nevertheless, measurements may diverge and, thus, can provide complementary information. Both ctDNA VAF and tumor volume were strong predictors of OS.
AB - Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is assumed to reflect tumor burden and has been suggested as a tool for prognostication and follow-up in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC). However, the prognostic value of ctDNA and its relation with tumor burden has yet to be substantiated, especially in mPDAC. In this retrospective analysis of prospectively collected samples, cell-free DNA from plasma samples of 58 treatment-naive mPDAC patients was isolated and sequenced using a custom-made pancreatobiliary NGS panel. Pathogenic mutations were detected in 26/58 (44.8%) samples. Cross-check with droplet digital PCR showed good agreement in Bland–Altman analysis (p = 0.217, nonsignificance indicating good agreement). In patients with liver metastases, ctDNA was more frequently detected (24/37, p < 0.001). Tumor volume (3D reconstructions from imaging) and ctDNA variant allele frequency (VAF) were correlated (Spearman's ρ = 0.544, p < 0.001). Median overall survival (OS) was 3.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6–4.9) versus 8.4 (95% CI 1.6–15.1) months in patients with detectable versus undetectable ctDNA (p = 0.005). Both ctDNA VAF and tumor volume independently predicted OS after adjustment for carbohydrate antigen 19.9 and treatment regimen (hazard ratio [HR] 1.05, 95% CI 1.01–1.09, p = 0.005; HR 1.00, 95% CI 1.01–1.05, p = 0.003). In conclusion, our study showed that ctDNA detection rates are higher in patients with larger tumor volume and liver metastases. Nevertheless, measurements may diverge and, thus, can provide complementary information. Both ctDNA VAF and tumor volume were strong predictors of OS.
KW - KRAS
KW - circulating tumor DNA
KW - pancreatic cancer
KW - prognosis
KW - tumor volume
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071182861&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/ijc.32586
DO - 10.1002/ijc.32586
M3 - Article
C2 - 31340061
VL - 146
SP - 1445
EP - 1456
JO - International Journal of Cancer
JF - International Journal of Cancer
SN - 0020-7136
IS - 5
ER -