TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical relevance of epidural steroid injections on lumbosacral radicular syndrome-related synptoms systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - de Bruijn, Thomas M.
AU - de Groot, Ingrid B.
AU - Miedema, Harald S.
AU - Haumann, Johan
AU - Ostelo, Raymond W. J. G.
N1 - Funding Information:
Dropouts: I 13, C 22 Received financial support from the Medical Research Council of Canada and the Canadian Arthritis Society
Funding Information:
No dropouts in the analyzed group. SF-36 analyses included a subgroup of participants. Received financial support from the University Medical Center Groningen
Funding Information:
Dropouts: I 3, C 8. Two of 3 treatment arms included in this study. Received financial support from the North Norway Regional Health Authority and Health Region Nord-Trøndelag, Norway
Funding Information:
Received financial support from the John P. Murtha Neuroscience and Pain Institute, International Spinal Intervention Society, and Center for Rehabilitation Sciences Research
Funding Information:
Dropouts: I 2, C 1 Received financial support from the Center for Rehabilitation Sciences Research, Bethesda, MD
Funding Information:
Dropouts: I 28, C 26 Injections at week 3 or 6 were dropped if the ODI improved by 75% beforehand Received financial support from the National Health Service Research and Development program, the UK
Funding Information:
Received financial support from the Yrjö Jahnsson Foundation, the Finnish Office for Health Technology Assessment, the Finnish Work Environment Fund, and the International Spinal Injection Society Dropouts not mentioned. Two of 4 treatment arms did not fulfill inclusion criteria. Characteristics not described
Funding Information:
Dropouts not mentioned Received financial support from the Trabriz University of Medical Sciences
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/7
Y1 - 2021/7
N2 - Objectives: Epidural steroid injections (ESIs) can be used to reduce lumbosacral radicular syndrome (LRS) related pain. The clinical relevance of ESIs are currently unknown. This systematic review and meta-analyses aims to assess whether ESIs are clinically relevant for patients with LRS. Materials and Methods: Comprehensive literature searches for randomized controlled trials regarding steroid injections for LRS were conducted in PudMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and CENTRAL from their inception to September 2018 (December 2019 for PubMed). For each homogenous comparison, the outcomes function, pain intensity and health-related quality of life at different follow-up intervals were pooled separately. The GRADE approach was used to determine the overall certainty of the evidence. Results: Seventeen studies were included. Two different homogenous comparisons were identified for which the randomized controlled trials could be pooled. In 36 of the 40 analyses no clinically relevant effect was found. The certainty of evidence varied between very low to high. Four analyses found a clinically relevant effect, all on pain intensity and health-related quality of life, but the certainty of the evidence was either low or very low. Two of the 33 subgroup analyses showed a clinically relevant effect. However, according to the GRADE approach the certainty of these findings are low to very low. Discussion: On the basis of the analyses we conclude there is insufficient evidence that ESIs for patients with LRS are clinically relevant at any follow-up moment. High-quality studies utilizing a predefined clinical success are necessary to identify potential clinically relevant effects of ESIs. Until the results of these studies are available, there is reason to consider whether the current daily practice of ESIs for patients with LRS should continue.
AB - Objectives: Epidural steroid injections (ESIs) can be used to reduce lumbosacral radicular syndrome (LRS) related pain. The clinical relevance of ESIs are currently unknown. This systematic review and meta-analyses aims to assess whether ESIs are clinically relevant for patients with LRS. Materials and Methods: Comprehensive literature searches for randomized controlled trials regarding steroid injections for LRS were conducted in PudMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and CENTRAL from their inception to September 2018 (December 2019 for PubMed). For each homogenous comparison, the outcomes function, pain intensity and health-related quality of life at different follow-up intervals were pooled separately. The GRADE approach was used to determine the overall certainty of the evidence. Results: Seventeen studies were included. Two different homogenous comparisons were identified for which the randomized controlled trials could be pooled. In 36 of the 40 analyses no clinically relevant effect was found. The certainty of evidence varied between very low to high. Four analyses found a clinically relevant effect, all on pain intensity and health-related quality of life, but the certainty of the evidence was either low or very low. Two of the 33 subgroup analyses showed a clinically relevant effect. However, according to the GRADE approach the certainty of these findings are low to very low. Discussion: On the basis of the analyses we conclude there is insufficient evidence that ESIs for patients with LRS are clinically relevant at any follow-up moment. High-quality studies utilizing a predefined clinical success are necessary to identify potential clinically relevant effects of ESIs. Until the results of these studies are available, there is reason to consider whether the current daily practice of ESIs for patients with LRS should continue.
KW - epidural steroid injection
KW - lumbosacral radicular syndrome
KW - sciatica
KW - steroid
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105547119&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000943
DO - 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000943
M3 - Article
C2 - 33859113
SN - 0749-8047
VL - 37
SP - 524
EP - 537
JO - The Clinical Journal of Pain
JF - The Clinical Journal of Pain
IS - 7
ER -