Cognitive composites for genetic frontotemporal dementia: GENFI-Cog

Jackie M. Poos, Katrina M. Moore, Jennifer Nicholas, Lucy L. Russell, Georgia Peakman, Rhian S. Convery, Lize C. Jiskoot, Emma van der Ende, Esther van den Berg, Janne M. Papma, Harro Seelaar, Yolande A. L. Pijnenburg, Fermin Moreno, Raquel Sanchez-Valle, Barbara Borroni, Robert Laforce, Mario Masellis, Carmela Tartaglia, Caroline Graff, Daniela GalimbertiJames B. Rowe, Elizabeth Finger, Matthis Synofzik, Rik Vandenberghe, Alexandre de Mendonça, Pietro Tiraboschi, Isabel Santana, Simon Ducharme, Chris Butler, Alexander Gerhard, Johannes Levin, Adrian Danek, Markus Otto, Isabel le Ber, Florence Pasquier, John C. van Swieten, Jonathan D. Rohrer*, on behalf of the Genetic FTD Initiative (GENFI), Arabella Bouzigues, Martin N. Rossor, Nick C. Fox, Jason D. Warren, Martina Bocchetta, Imogen J. Swift, Rachelle Shafei, Carolin Heller, Emily Todd, David Cash, Ione Woollacott, Henrik Zetterberg, Annabel Nelson, Rita Guerreiro, Jose Bras, David L. Thomas, Simon Mead, Lieke Meeter, Jessica Panman, Rick van Minkelen, Myriam Barandiaran, Begoña Indakoetxea, Alazne Gabilondo, Mikel Tainta, Ana Gorostidi, Miren Zulaica, Alina Díez, Jorge Villanua, Sergi Borrego-Ecija, Jaume Olives, Albert Lladó, Mircea Balasa, Anna Antonell, Nuria Bargallo, Enrico Premi, Stefano Gazzina, Roberto Gasparotti, Silvana Archetti, Sandra Black, Sara Mitchell, Ekaterina Rogaeva, Morris Freedman, Ron Keren, David Tang-Wai, Hakan Thonberg, Linn Öijerstedt, Christin Andersson, Vesna Jelic, Andrea Arighi, Chiara Fenoglio, Elio Scarpini, Giorgio Fumagalli, Thomas Cope, Carolyn Timberlake, Timothy Rittman, Christen Shoesmith, Robart Bartha, Rosa Rademakers, Carlo Wilke, Hans-Otto Karnarth, Benjamin Bender, Rose Bruffaerts, Philip Vandamme, Mathieu Vandenbulcke, Catarina B. Ferreira, Gabriel Miltenberger, Carolina Maruta, Ana Verdelho, S. nia Afonso, Ricardo Taipa, Paola Caroppo, Giuseppe di Fede, Giorgio Giaccone, Sara Prioni, Veronica Redaelli, Giacomina Rossi, Diana Duro, Maria Rosario Almeida, Miguel Castelo-Branco, Maria João Leitão, Miguel Tabuas-Pereira, Beatriz Santiago, Serge Gauthier, Pedro Rosa-Neto, Michele Veldsman, Paul Thompson, Tobias Langheinrich, Catharina Prix, Tobias Hoegen, Elisabeth Wlasich, Sandra Loosli, Sonja Schonecker, Sarah Anderl-Straub, Jolina Lombardi, Nuria Bargalló, Alberto Benussi, Valentina Cantoni, Maxime Bertoux, Anne Bertrand, Alexis Brice, Agnès Camuzat, Olivier Colliot, Sabrina Sayah, Aurélie Funkiewiez, Daisy Rinaldi, Gemma Lombardi, Benedetta Nacmias, Dario Saracino, Valentina Bessi, Camilla Ferrari, Marta Cañada, Vincent Deramecourt, Gregory Kuchcinski, Thibaud Lebouvier, Sebastien Ourselin, Cristina Polito, Adeline Rollin

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Clinical endpoints for upcoming therapeutic trials in frontotemporal dementia (FTD) are increasingly urgent. Cognitive composite scores are often used as endpoints but are lacking in genetic FTD. We aimed to create cognitive composite scores for genetic frontotemporal dementia (FTD) as well as recommendations for recruitment and duration in clinical trial design. Methods: A standardized neuropsychological test battery covering six cognitive domains was completed by 69 C9orf72, 41 GRN, and 28 MAPT mutation carriers with CDR® plus NACC-FTLD ≥ 0.5 and 275 controls. Logistic regression was used to identify the combination of tests that distinguished best between each mutation carrier group and controls. The composite scores were calculated from the weighted averages of test scores in the models based on the regression coefficients. Sample size estimates were calculated for individual cognitive tests and composites in a theoretical trial aimed at preventing progression from a prodromal stage (CDR® plus NACC-FTLD 0.5) to a fully symptomatic stage (CDR® plus NACC-FTLD ≥ 1). Time-to-event analysis was performed to determine how quickly mutation carriers progressed from CDR® plus NACC-FTLD = 0.5 to ≥ 1 (and therefore how long a trial would need to be). Results: The results from the logistic regression analyses resulted in different composite scores for each mutation carrier group (i.e. C9orf72, GRN, and MAPT). The estimated sample size to detect a treatment effect was lower for composite scores than for most individual tests. A Kaplan-Meier curve showed that after 3 years, ~ 50% of individuals had converted from CDR® plus NACC-FTLD 0.5 to ≥ 1, which means that the estimated effect size needs to be halved in sample size calculations as only half of the mutation carriers would be expected to progress from CDR® plus NACC FTLD 0.5 to ≥ 1 without treatment over that time period. Discussion: We created gene-specific cognitive composite scores for C9orf72, GRN, and MAPT mutation carriers, which resulted in substantially lower estimated sample sizes to detect a treatment effect than the individual cognitive tests. The GENFI-Cog composites have potential as cognitive endpoints for upcoming clinical trials. The results from this study provide recommendations for estimating sample size and trial duration.
Original languageEnglish
Article number10
JournalAlzheimer's Research and Therapy
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2022

Cite this