Comment on van den Berg et al: "Methodology of Clinical Nutrition Guidelines for Adult Cancer Patients: How Good Are They According to AGREE Criteria?"

T. van den Berg, E.G. Engelhardt, T.M. Haanstra, J.A.E. Langius, M.W. van Tulder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)504-505
JournalJournal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutition
Volume36
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Cite this

@article{40b3a95238d24b1db647ed5b2d6e1bdf,
title = "Comment on van den Berg et al: {"}Methodology of Clinical Nutrition Guidelines for Adult Cancer Patients: How Good Are They According to AGREE Criteria?{"}",
author = "{van den Berg}, T. and E.G. Engelhardt and T.M. Haanstra and J.A.E. Langius and {van Tulder}, M.W.",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1177/0148607112453334",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "504--505",
journal = "Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutition",
issn = "0148-6071",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "5",

}

Comment on van den Berg et al: "Methodology of Clinical Nutrition Guidelines for Adult Cancer Patients: How Good Are They According to AGREE Criteria?". / van den Berg, T.; Engelhardt, E.G.; Haanstra, T.M.; Langius, J.A.E.; van Tulder, M.W.

In: Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutition, Vol. 36, No. 5, 2012, p. 504-505.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comment on van den Berg et al: "Methodology of Clinical Nutrition Guidelines for Adult Cancer Patients: How Good Are They According to AGREE Criteria?"

AU - van den Berg, T.

AU - Engelhardt, E.G.

AU - Haanstra, T.M.

AU - Langius, J.A.E.

AU - van Tulder, M.W.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

U2 - 10.1177/0148607112453334

DO - 10.1177/0148607112453334

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 504

EP - 505

JO - Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutition

JF - Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutition

SN - 0148-6071

IS - 5

ER -