Commentary on Case 2.3

Barbara Groot, Melanie Peterman, Ruud van Zuijlen, Tineke Abma

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/Letter to the editorAcademic

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)48
JournalEthics in Participatory Research for Health and Social Well-Being: Cases and Commentaries
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Cite this

@article{e95e77e1b228499585d5cc9f6f3a429f,
title = "Commentary on Case 2.3",
author = "Barbara Groot and Melanie Peterman and {van Zuijlen}, Ruud and Tineke Abma",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.4324/9781315106847",
language = "English",
pages = "48",
journal = "Ethics in Participatory Research for Health and Social Well-Being: Cases and Commentaries",

}

Commentary on Case 2.3. / Groot, Barbara; Peterman, Melanie; van Zuijlen, Ruud; Abma, Tineke.

In: Ethics in Participatory Research for Health and Social Well-Being: Cases and Commentaries, 2018, p. 48.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/Letter to the editorAcademic

TY - JOUR

T1 - Commentary on Case 2.3

AU - Groot, Barbara

AU - Peterman, Melanie

AU - van Zuijlen, Ruud

AU - Abma, Tineke

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85059361550&origin=inward

U2 - 10.4324/9781315106847

DO - 10.4324/9781315106847

M3 - Comment/Letter to the editor

SP - 48

JO - Ethics in Participatory Research for Health and Social Well-Being: Cases and Commentaries

JF - Ethics in Participatory Research for Health and Social Well-Being: Cases and Commentaries

ER -