TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparing two diagnostic laboratory tests for Williams syndrome
T2 - fluorescent in situ hybridization versus multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification
AU - van Hagen, Johanna M
AU - Eussen, Hubertus J F M M
AU - van Schooten, Ron
AU - van Der Geest, Josef N
AU - Lagers-van Haselen, Gerardina C
AU - Wouters, Cokkie H
AU - De Zeeuw, Chris I
AU - Gille, Johan J P
PY - 2007
Y1 - 2007
N2 - Most people with Williams syndrome (WS) have a heterozygous 1.55 Mb deletion on chromosome 7q11.23. For diagnostic purposes, fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) with commercial FISH probes is commonly used to detect this deletion. We investigated whether multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) is a reliable alternative for FISH. The MLPA kit (SALSA P029) contains probes for eight genes in the WS critical region: FKBP6, FZD9, TBL2, STX1A, ELN, LIMK1, RFC2, and CYLN2. The experimental FISH assay that was used consists of four probes covering the WS critical region. A total number of 63 patients was tested; in 53 patients, a deletion was detected both with FISH and MLPA(P029), in 10 patients both techniques failed to demonstrate a deletion. In only one patient, a deletion was detected which was not previously detected by two commercial FISH probes. This patient appeared to carry a small, atypical deletion. We conclude that MLPA is a reliable technique to detect WS. Compared with FISH, MLPA is less time consuming and has the possibility to detect also smaller, atypical deletions and duplications in the WS critical region.
AB - Most people with Williams syndrome (WS) have a heterozygous 1.55 Mb deletion on chromosome 7q11.23. For diagnostic purposes, fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) with commercial FISH probes is commonly used to detect this deletion. We investigated whether multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) is a reliable alternative for FISH. The MLPA kit (SALSA P029) contains probes for eight genes in the WS critical region: FKBP6, FZD9, TBL2, STX1A, ELN, LIMK1, RFC2, and CYLN2. The experimental FISH assay that was used consists of four probes covering the WS critical region. A total number of 63 patients was tested; in 53 patients, a deletion was detected both with FISH and MLPA(P029), in 10 patients both techniques failed to demonstrate a deletion. In only one patient, a deletion was detected which was not previously detected by two commercial FISH probes. This patient appeared to carry a small, atypical deletion. We conclude that MLPA is a reliable technique to detect WS. Compared with FISH, MLPA is less time consuming and has the possibility to detect also smaller, atypical deletions and duplications in the WS critical region.
KW - Chromosomes, Human, Pair 7
KW - Face/abnormalities
KW - Humans
KW - In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence/methods
KW - Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques/methods
KW - Phenotype
KW - Williams Syndrome/diagnosis
U2 - 10.1089/gte.2007.0007
DO - 10.1089/gte.2007.0007
M3 - Article
C2 - 17949295
VL - 11
SP - 321
EP - 327
JO - Genetic Testing
JF - Genetic Testing
SN - 1090-6576
IS - 3
ER -