TY - JOUR
T1 - Conceptualizing and Fostering the Quality of CES Through a Dutch National Network on CES (NEON)
AU - Hartman, Laura
AU - Widdershoven, Guy
AU - van Baarle, Eva
AU - Weidema, Froukje
AU - Molewijk, Bert
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Mariëlle Diepeveen, Yolande Voskes, Marline van Hoek, Marieke Potma and Jelle van Gurp for participating in different phases of this project. Also we would like to thank Emy Kool for her contribution as participating intern. Finally, we want to acknowledge all NEON participants and especially those participants that took part in the responsive quality assessments. This project was funded by the Dutch Ministry of Health.
Funding Information:
NEON was founded in the context of a 4 years research project at [blinded for review] funded by the Ministry of Health of the Netherlands that started 1–12-2013. When the funding ended (1–08-2018), the network continued as an independent foundation.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - The prevalence of Clinical ethics support (CES) services is increasing. Yet, questions about what quality of CES entails and how to foster the quality of CES remain. This paper describes the development of a national network (NEON), which aimed to conceptualize and foster the quality of CES in the Netherlands simultaneously. Our methodology was inspired by a responsive evaluation approach which shares some of our key theoretical presuppositions of CES. A responsive evaluation methodology engages stakeholders in developing quality standards of a certain practice, instead of evaluating a practice by predefined standards. In this paper, we describe the relationship between our theoretical viewpoint on CES and a responsive evaluation methodology. Then we describe the development of the network (NEON) and focus on three activities that exemplify our approach. In the discussion, we reflect on the similarities and differences between our approach and other international initiatives focusing on the quality of CES.
AB - The prevalence of Clinical ethics support (CES) services is increasing. Yet, questions about what quality of CES entails and how to foster the quality of CES remain. This paper describes the development of a national network (NEON), which aimed to conceptualize and foster the quality of CES in the Netherlands simultaneously. Our methodology was inspired by a responsive evaluation approach which shares some of our key theoretical presuppositions of CES. A responsive evaluation methodology engages stakeholders in developing quality standards of a certain practice, instead of evaluating a practice by predefined standards. In this paper, we describe the relationship between our theoretical viewpoint on CES and a responsive evaluation methodology. Then we describe the development of the network (NEON) and focus on three activities that exemplify our approach. In the discussion, we reflect on the similarities and differences between our approach and other international initiatives focusing on the quality of CES.
KW - Clinical ethics support
KW - Learning
KW - Quality
KW - Responsive evaluation methodology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100049065&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10730-020-09432-6
DO - 10.1007/s10730-020-09432-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 33449233
JO - HEC Forum
JF - HEC Forum
SN - 0956-2737
ER -