Contact dermatitis is an unrecognized problem in the construction industry: Comparison of four different assessment methods

Johan G. Timmerman, Dick Heederik, Ton Spee, Frits G. van Rooy, Esmeralda J.M. Krop, Thomas Rustemeyer, Lidwien A.M. Smit

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: A high contact dermatitis symptoms prevalence has been observed in Dutch construction workers. Methods: Contact dermatitis was diagnosed by an expert panel using questionnaire data and photographs of 751 subjects’ hands. A subset was evaluated by two occupational physicians. Their diagnoses were compared to those of the expert panel. In addition, two self-reported questionnaire-based assessment methods were compared to the expert panel evaluation. Associations between contact dermatitis and determinants were assessed using log-binomial regression analysis. Results: Contact dermatitis prevalence was high: 61.4% (expert panel's diagnosis) and 32.9% (self-reported). Agreement between occupational physicians and the expert panel was low but increased after training. Washing hands with solvents and performing job-related tasks at home were related to contact dermatitis. Conclusions: Contact dermatitis prevalence among construction workers is high. Recognition of contact dermatitis by occupational physicians is poor but can be improved by training. Awareness of skin disorders should be raised.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)879-888
Number of pages10
JournalAmerican Journal of Industrial Medicine
Volume60
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2017

Cite this

Timmerman, Johan G. ; Heederik, Dick ; Spee, Ton ; van Rooy, Frits G. ; Krop, Esmeralda J.M. ; Rustemeyer, Thomas ; Smit, Lidwien A.M. / Contact dermatitis is an unrecognized problem in the construction industry : Comparison of four different assessment methods. In: American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 2017 ; Vol. 60, No. 10. pp. 879-888.
@article{78312e3312424bdab614678516c7e09c,
title = "Contact dermatitis is an unrecognized problem in the construction industry: Comparison of four different assessment methods",
abstract = "Background: A high contact dermatitis symptoms prevalence has been observed in Dutch construction workers. Methods: Contact dermatitis was diagnosed by an expert panel using questionnaire data and photographs of 751 subjects’ hands. A subset was evaluated by two occupational physicians. Their diagnoses were compared to those of the expert panel. In addition, two self-reported questionnaire-based assessment methods were compared to the expert panel evaluation. Associations between contact dermatitis and determinants were assessed using log-binomial regression analysis. Results: Contact dermatitis prevalence was high: 61.4{\%} (expert panel's diagnosis) and 32.9{\%} (self-reported). Agreement between occupational physicians and the expert panel was low but increased after training. Washing hands with solvents and performing job-related tasks at home were related to contact dermatitis. Conclusions: Contact dermatitis prevalence among construction workers is high. Recognition of contact dermatitis by occupational physicians is poor but can be improved by training. Awareness of skin disorders should be raised.",
keywords = "agreement, construction industry, determinants, diagnosis, occupational contact dermatitis, occupational health care, prevalence",
author = "Timmerman, {Johan G.} and Dick Heederik and Ton Spee and {van Rooy}, {Frits G.} and Krop, {Esmeralda J.M.} and Thomas Rustemeyer and Smit, {Lidwien A.M.}",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/ajim.22742",
language = "English",
volume = "60",
pages = "879--888",
journal = "American Journal of Industrial Medicine",
issn = "0271-3586",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "10",

}

Contact dermatitis is an unrecognized problem in the construction industry : Comparison of four different assessment methods. / Timmerman, Johan G.; Heederik, Dick; Spee, Ton; van Rooy, Frits G.; Krop, Esmeralda J.M.; Rustemeyer, Thomas; Smit, Lidwien A.M.

In: American Journal of Industrial Medicine, Vol. 60, No. 10, 01.10.2017, p. 879-888.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contact dermatitis is an unrecognized problem in the construction industry

T2 - Comparison of four different assessment methods

AU - Timmerman, Johan G.

AU - Heederik, Dick

AU - Spee, Ton

AU - van Rooy, Frits G.

AU - Krop, Esmeralda J.M.

AU - Rustemeyer, Thomas

AU - Smit, Lidwien A.M.

PY - 2017/10/1

Y1 - 2017/10/1

N2 - Background: A high contact dermatitis symptoms prevalence has been observed in Dutch construction workers. Methods: Contact dermatitis was diagnosed by an expert panel using questionnaire data and photographs of 751 subjects’ hands. A subset was evaluated by two occupational physicians. Their diagnoses were compared to those of the expert panel. In addition, two self-reported questionnaire-based assessment methods were compared to the expert panel evaluation. Associations between contact dermatitis and determinants were assessed using log-binomial regression analysis. Results: Contact dermatitis prevalence was high: 61.4% (expert panel's diagnosis) and 32.9% (self-reported). Agreement between occupational physicians and the expert panel was low but increased after training. Washing hands with solvents and performing job-related tasks at home were related to contact dermatitis. Conclusions: Contact dermatitis prevalence among construction workers is high. Recognition of contact dermatitis by occupational physicians is poor but can be improved by training. Awareness of skin disorders should be raised.

AB - Background: A high contact dermatitis symptoms prevalence has been observed in Dutch construction workers. Methods: Contact dermatitis was diagnosed by an expert panel using questionnaire data and photographs of 751 subjects’ hands. A subset was evaluated by two occupational physicians. Their diagnoses were compared to those of the expert panel. In addition, two self-reported questionnaire-based assessment methods were compared to the expert panel evaluation. Associations between contact dermatitis and determinants were assessed using log-binomial regression analysis. Results: Contact dermatitis prevalence was high: 61.4% (expert panel's diagnosis) and 32.9% (self-reported). Agreement between occupational physicians and the expert panel was low but increased after training. Washing hands with solvents and performing job-related tasks at home were related to contact dermatitis. Conclusions: Contact dermatitis prevalence among construction workers is high. Recognition of contact dermatitis by occupational physicians is poor but can be improved by training. Awareness of skin disorders should be raised.

KW - agreement

KW - construction industry

KW - determinants

KW - diagnosis

KW - occupational contact dermatitis

KW - occupational health care

KW - prevalence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029609239&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ajim.22742

DO - 10.1002/ajim.22742

M3 - Article

VL - 60

SP - 879

EP - 888

JO - American Journal of Industrial Medicine

JF - American Journal of Industrial Medicine

SN - 0271-3586

IS - 10

ER -