Correction: Relative cerebral flow from dynamic PIB scans as an alternative for FDG scans in Alzheimer’s disease PET studies (PLoS ONE (2019) 14: 1 (e0211000) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211000)

D. bora E. Peretti, David V. llez García, Fransje E. Reesink, Tim van der Goot, Peter P. de Deyn, Bauke M. de Jong, Rudi A. J. O. Dierckx, Ronald Boellaard

Research output: Contribution to journalErratumAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

There is an error in the fourth sentence of the second paragraph of the “Image processing” subsection of the Materials and Methods. The correct sentence is: Then, the k’ 2 parameter was defined as the median value from all voxels that have a BP nd value higher than 0.05. There is an error in the third sentence of the third paragraph of the “Group differences” subsection of the Results. The correct sentence is: The region that presented the highest values was, for both groups, the Putamen (1.14 ± 0.07 for the PIB+ group and 1.13 ± 0.05 for the PIB-group). There is an error in the DOI of reference 14. The correct reference is: Gjedde A, Aanerud J, Braendgaard H, Rodell AB. Blood-brain transfer of Pittsburgh compound B in humans. Front Aging Neurosci. 2013;5: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2013.00070. The images for Figs 4–6 are incorrectly switched. The image that appears as Fig 4 should be Fig 6; the image that appears as Fig 5 should be Fig 4, and the image that appears as Fig 6 should be Fig 5. The figure captions appear in the correct order. Please see the correct figures and their respective captions here. (Figure presented).
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0214187
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume14
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2019
Externally publishedYes

Cite this