Cost-effectiveness of manual therapy versus physiotherapy in patients with sub-acute and chronic neck pain: a randomised controlled trial: European Spine Journal

J. M. van Dongen, R. Groeneweg, S. M. Rubinstein, Judith E. Bosmans, R.A.B. Oostendorp, Rwjg Ostelo, M. W. van Tulder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of manual therapy according to the Utrecht School (MTU) in comparison with physiotherapy (PT) in sub-acute and chronic non-specific neck pain patients from a societal perspective. An economic evaluation was conducted alongside a 52-week randomized controlled trial, in which 90 patients were randomized to the MTU group and 91 to the PT group. Clinical outcomes included perceived recovery (yes/no), functional status (continuous and yes/no), and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Costs were measured from a societal perspective using self-reported questionnaires. Missing data were imputed using multiple imputation. To estimate statistical uncertainty, bootstrapping techniques were used. After 52 weeks, there were no significant between-group differences in clinical outcomes. During follow-up, intervention costs (beta:a,not sign-32; 95 %CI: -54 to -10) and healthcare costs (beta:a,not sign-126; 95 %CI: -235 to -32) were significantly lower in the MTU group than in the PT group, whereas unpaid productivity costs were significantly higher (beta:a,not sign186; 95 %CI:19-557). Societal costs did not significantly differ between groups (beta:a,not sign-96; 95 %CI:-1975-2022). For QALYs and functional status (yes/no), the maximum probability of MTU being cost-effective in comparison with PT was low (a parts per thousand currency sign0.54). For perceived recovery (yes/no) and functional status (continuous), a large amount of money must be paid per additional unit of effect to reach a reasonable probability of cost-effectiveness. From a societal perspective, MTU was not cost-effective in comparison with PT in patients with sub-acute and chronic non-specific neck pain for perceived recovery, functional status, and QALYs. As no clear total societal cost and effect differences were found between MTU and PT, the decision about what intervention to administer, reimburse, and/or implement can be based on the preferences of the patient and the decision-maker at hand. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00713843.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2087-2096
Number of pages10
JournalEuropean Spine Journal
Volume25
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Cite this

van Dongen, J. M. ; Groeneweg, R. ; Rubinstein, S. M. ; Bosmans, Judith E. ; Oostendorp, R.A.B. ; Ostelo, Rwjg ; van Tulder, M. W. / Cost-effectiveness of manual therapy versus physiotherapy in patients with sub-acute and chronic neck pain: a randomised controlled trial : European Spine Journal. In: European Spine Journal. 2016 ; Vol. 25. pp. 2087-2096.
@article{4a6b757a726b4a818741f2f6c693dca3,
title = "Cost-effectiveness of manual therapy versus physiotherapy in patients with sub-acute and chronic neck pain: a randomised controlled trial: European Spine Journal",
abstract = "To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of manual therapy according to the Utrecht School (MTU) in comparison with physiotherapy (PT) in sub-acute and chronic non-specific neck pain patients from a societal perspective. An economic evaluation was conducted alongside a 52-week randomized controlled trial, in which 90 patients were randomized to the MTU group and 91 to the PT group. Clinical outcomes included perceived recovery (yes/no), functional status (continuous and yes/no), and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Costs were measured from a societal perspective using self-reported questionnaires. Missing data were imputed using multiple imputation. To estimate statistical uncertainty, bootstrapping techniques were used. After 52 weeks, there were no significant between-group differences in clinical outcomes. During follow-up, intervention costs (beta:a,not sign-32; 95 {\%}CI: -54 to -10) and healthcare costs (beta:a,not sign-126; 95 {\%}CI: -235 to -32) were significantly lower in the MTU group than in the PT group, whereas unpaid productivity costs were significantly higher (beta:a,not sign186; 95 {\%}CI:19-557). Societal costs did not significantly differ between groups (beta:a,not sign-96; 95 {\%}CI:-1975-2022). For QALYs and functional status (yes/no), the maximum probability of MTU being cost-effective in comparison with PT was low (a parts per thousand currency sign0.54). For perceived recovery (yes/no) and functional status (continuous), a large amount of money must be paid per additional unit of effect to reach a reasonable probability of cost-effectiveness. From a societal perspective, MTU was not cost-effective in comparison with PT in patients with sub-acute and chronic non-specific neck pain for perceived recovery, functional status, and QALYs. As no clear total societal cost and effect differences were found between MTU and PT, the decision about what intervention to administer, reimburse, and/or implement can be based on the preferences of the patient and the decision-maker at hand. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00713843.",
author = "{van Dongen}, {J. M.} and R. Groeneweg and Rubinstein, {S. M.} and Bosmans, {Judith E.} and R.A.B. Oostendorp and Rwjg Ostelo and {van Tulder}, {M. W.}",
note = "M1 - 7 ISI Document Delivery No.: DQ1FB Times Cited: 0 Cited Reference Count: 20 van Dongen, J. M. Groeneweg, R. Rubinstein, S. M. Bosmans, J. E. Oostendorp, R. A. B. Ostelo, R. W. J. G. van Tulder, M. W. van Tulder, Maurits/0000-0002-7589-8471 Health Care Foundation 'Spaarneland' This study was funded in-part by the Health Care Foundation 'Spaarneland', which is a program for funding innovative projects of one of the health insurance companies in the Netherlands ('Zilverenkruis/Achmea'), while the majority of the study was self-financed. The Foundation had no further role in the design of the study, in the collection, analysis and interpretation of the data, and in drafting the manuscript. 0 2 6 SPRINGER NEW YORK EUR SPINE J SI",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1007/s00586-016-4526-0",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "2087--2096",
journal = "European Spine Journal",
issn = "0940-6719",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",

}

Cost-effectiveness of manual therapy versus physiotherapy in patients with sub-acute and chronic neck pain: a randomised controlled trial : European Spine Journal. / van Dongen, J. M.; Groeneweg, R.; Rubinstein, S. M.; Bosmans, Judith E.; Oostendorp, R.A.B.; Ostelo, Rwjg; van Tulder, M. W.

In: European Spine Journal, Vol. 25, 2016, p. 2087-2096.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cost-effectiveness of manual therapy versus physiotherapy in patients with sub-acute and chronic neck pain: a randomised controlled trial

T2 - European Spine Journal

AU - van Dongen, J. M.

AU - Groeneweg, R.

AU - Rubinstein, S. M.

AU - Bosmans, Judith E.

AU - Oostendorp, R.A.B.

AU - Ostelo, Rwjg

AU - van Tulder, M. W.

N1 - M1 - 7 ISI Document Delivery No.: DQ1FB Times Cited: 0 Cited Reference Count: 20 van Dongen, J. M. Groeneweg, R. Rubinstein, S. M. Bosmans, J. E. Oostendorp, R. A. B. Ostelo, R. W. J. G. van Tulder, M. W. van Tulder, Maurits/0000-0002-7589-8471 Health Care Foundation 'Spaarneland' This study was funded in-part by the Health Care Foundation 'Spaarneland', which is a program for funding innovative projects of one of the health insurance companies in the Netherlands ('Zilverenkruis/Achmea'), while the majority of the study was self-financed. The Foundation had no further role in the design of the study, in the collection, analysis and interpretation of the data, and in drafting the manuscript. 0 2 6 SPRINGER NEW YORK EUR SPINE J SI

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of manual therapy according to the Utrecht School (MTU) in comparison with physiotherapy (PT) in sub-acute and chronic non-specific neck pain patients from a societal perspective. An economic evaluation was conducted alongside a 52-week randomized controlled trial, in which 90 patients were randomized to the MTU group and 91 to the PT group. Clinical outcomes included perceived recovery (yes/no), functional status (continuous and yes/no), and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Costs were measured from a societal perspective using self-reported questionnaires. Missing data were imputed using multiple imputation. To estimate statistical uncertainty, bootstrapping techniques were used. After 52 weeks, there were no significant between-group differences in clinical outcomes. During follow-up, intervention costs (beta:a,not sign-32; 95 %CI: -54 to -10) and healthcare costs (beta:a,not sign-126; 95 %CI: -235 to -32) were significantly lower in the MTU group than in the PT group, whereas unpaid productivity costs were significantly higher (beta:a,not sign186; 95 %CI:19-557). Societal costs did not significantly differ between groups (beta:a,not sign-96; 95 %CI:-1975-2022). For QALYs and functional status (yes/no), the maximum probability of MTU being cost-effective in comparison with PT was low (a parts per thousand currency sign0.54). For perceived recovery (yes/no) and functional status (continuous), a large amount of money must be paid per additional unit of effect to reach a reasonable probability of cost-effectiveness. From a societal perspective, MTU was not cost-effective in comparison with PT in patients with sub-acute and chronic non-specific neck pain for perceived recovery, functional status, and QALYs. As no clear total societal cost and effect differences were found between MTU and PT, the decision about what intervention to administer, reimburse, and/or implement can be based on the preferences of the patient and the decision-maker at hand. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00713843.

AB - To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of manual therapy according to the Utrecht School (MTU) in comparison with physiotherapy (PT) in sub-acute and chronic non-specific neck pain patients from a societal perspective. An economic evaluation was conducted alongside a 52-week randomized controlled trial, in which 90 patients were randomized to the MTU group and 91 to the PT group. Clinical outcomes included perceived recovery (yes/no), functional status (continuous and yes/no), and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Costs were measured from a societal perspective using self-reported questionnaires. Missing data were imputed using multiple imputation. To estimate statistical uncertainty, bootstrapping techniques were used. After 52 weeks, there were no significant between-group differences in clinical outcomes. During follow-up, intervention costs (beta:a,not sign-32; 95 %CI: -54 to -10) and healthcare costs (beta:a,not sign-126; 95 %CI: -235 to -32) were significantly lower in the MTU group than in the PT group, whereas unpaid productivity costs were significantly higher (beta:a,not sign186; 95 %CI:19-557). Societal costs did not significantly differ between groups (beta:a,not sign-96; 95 %CI:-1975-2022). For QALYs and functional status (yes/no), the maximum probability of MTU being cost-effective in comparison with PT was low (a parts per thousand currency sign0.54). For perceived recovery (yes/no) and functional status (continuous), a large amount of money must be paid per additional unit of effect to reach a reasonable probability of cost-effectiveness. From a societal perspective, MTU was not cost-effective in comparison with PT in patients with sub-acute and chronic non-specific neck pain for perceived recovery, functional status, and QALYs. As no clear total societal cost and effect differences were found between MTU and PT, the decision about what intervention to administer, reimburse, and/or implement can be based on the preferences of the patient and the decision-maker at hand. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00713843.

U2 - 10.1007/s00586-016-4526-0

DO - 10.1007/s00586-016-4526-0

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 2087

EP - 2096

JO - European Spine Journal

JF - European Spine Journal

SN - 0940-6719

ER -