Criteria-Based Return to Sport Decision-Making Following Lateral Ankle Sprain Injury: a Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis

Bruno Tassignon, Jo Verschueren, Eamonn Delahunt, Michelle Smith, Bill Vicenzino, Evert Verhagen, Romain Meeusen

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this systematic review was to identify prospective studies that used a criteria-based return to sport (RTS) decision-making process for patients with lateral ankle sprain (LAS) injury. Design: Systematic review and narrative synthesis. Data sources: The PubMed (MEDLINE), Web of Science, PEDro, Cochrane Library, SPORTDiscus (EBSCO), ScienceDirect, and Scopus databases were searched to 23 November 2018. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: Studies were included if they prospectively applied a criteria-based RTS decision-making process for patients with LAS injury, but were excluded if they merely gathered outcome measures at the RTS time point. Studies were also excluded if patients were recovering from ankle fracture, high ankle sprain, medial ankle sprain, chronic ankle instability or complex ankle injury. Results: No studies were identified that used a criteria-based RTS decision-making process for patients with LAS injury. We were unable to conduct a quantitative synthesis or meta-analysis, therefore we provide a narrative synthesis of relevant questionnaires, as well as clinical and functional assessments commonly used in studies retrieved in the search. Conclusion: There are currently no published evidence-based criteria to inform RTS decisions for patients with an LAS injury. Based on our narrative synthesis, we propose a number of variables that could be used to develop a criteria-based RTS decision paradigm. Future research should aim to reach consensus on these variables and apply them to actual RTS decisions within prospective study designs. Furthermore, we suggest that complex systems theory and the RTS continuum could be used to inform the development of an RTS decision-making paradigm for athletes with LAS injury.

Original languageEnglish
JournalSports Medicine
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2019

Cite this

Tassignon, Bruno ; Verschueren, Jo ; Delahunt, Eamonn ; Smith, Michelle ; Vicenzino, Bill ; Verhagen, Evert ; Meeusen, Romain. / Criteria-Based Return to Sport Decision-Making Following Lateral Ankle Sprain Injury : a Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis. In: Sports Medicine. 2019.
@article{61b3af81d50c486a817900aa84d0097a,
title = "Criteria-Based Return to Sport Decision-Making Following Lateral Ankle Sprain Injury: a Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis",
abstract = "Objective: The aim of this systematic review was to identify prospective studies that used a criteria-based return to sport (RTS) decision-making process for patients with lateral ankle sprain (LAS) injury. Design: Systematic review and narrative synthesis. Data sources: The PubMed (MEDLINE), Web of Science, PEDro, Cochrane Library, SPORTDiscus (EBSCO), ScienceDirect, and Scopus databases were searched to 23 November 2018. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: Studies were included if they prospectively applied a criteria-based RTS decision-making process for patients with LAS injury, but were excluded if they merely gathered outcome measures at the RTS time point. Studies were also excluded if patients were recovering from ankle fracture, high ankle sprain, medial ankle sprain, chronic ankle instability or complex ankle injury. Results: No studies were identified that used a criteria-based RTS decision-making process for patients with LAS injury. We were unable to conduct a quantitative synthesis or meta-analysis, therefore we provide a narrative synthesis of relevant questionnaires, as well as clinical and functional assessments commonly used in studies retrieved in the search. Conclusion: There are currently no published evidence-based criteria to inform RTS decisions for patients with an LAS injury. Based on our narrative synthesis, we propose a number of variables that could be used to develop a criteria-based RTS decision paradigm. Future research should aim to reach consensus on these variables and apply them to actual RTS decisions within prospective study designs. Furthermore, we suggest that complex systems theory and the RTS continuum could be used to inform the development of an RTS decision-making paradigm for athletes with LAS injury.",
author = "Bruno Tassignon and Jo Verschueren and Eamonn Delahunt and Michelle Smith and Bill Vicenzino and Evert Verhagen and Romain Meeusen",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s40279-019-01071-3",
language = "English",
journal = "Sports Medicine",
issn = "0112-1642",
publisher = "Springer International Publishing AG",

}

Criteria-Based Return to Sport Decision-Making Following Lateral Ankle Sprain Injury : a Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis. / Tassignon, Bruno; Verschueren, Jo; Delahunt, Eamonn; Smith, Michelle; Vicenzino, Bill; Verhagen, Evert; Meeusen, Romain.

In: Sports Medicine, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Criteria-Based Return to Sport Decision-Making Following Lateral Ankle Sprain Injury

T2 - a Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis

AU - Tassignon, Bruno

AU - Verschueren, Jo

AU - Delahunt, Eamonn

AU - Smith, Michelle

AU - Vicenzino, Bill

AU - Verhagen, Evert

AU - Meeusen, Romain

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Objective: The aim of this systematic review was to identify prospective studies that used a criteria-based return to sport (RTS) decision-making process for patients with lateral ankle sprain (LAS) injury. Design: Systematic review and narrative synthesis. Data sources: The PubMed (MEDLINE), Web of Science, PEDro, Cochrane Library, SPORTDiscus (EBSCO), ScienceDirect, and Scopus databases were searched to 23 November 2018. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: Studies were included if they prospectively applied a criteria-based RTS decision-making process for patients with LAS injury, but were excluded if they merely gathered outcome measures at the RTS time point. Studies were also excluded if patients were recovering from ankle fracture, high ankle sprain, medial ankle sprain, chronic ankle instability or complex ankle injury. Results: No studies were identified that used a criteria-based RTS decision-making process for patients with LAS injury. We were unable to conduct a quantitative synthesis or meta-analysis, therefore we provide a narrative synthesis of relevant questionnaires, as well as clinical and functional assessments commonly used in studies retrieved in the search. Conclusion: There are currently no published evidence-based criteria to inform RTS decisions for patients with an LAS injury. Based on our narrative synthesis, we propose a number of variables that could be used to develop a criteria-based RTS decision paradigm. Future research should aim to reach consensus on these variables and apply them to actual RTS decisions within prospective study designs. Furthermore, we suggest that complex systems theory and the RTS continuum could be used to inform the development of an RTS decision-making paradigm for athletes with LAS injury.

AB - Objective: The aim of this systematic review was to identify prospective studies that used a criteria-based return to sport (RTS) decision-making process for patients with lateral ankle sprain (LAS) injury. Design: Systematic review and narrative synthesis. Data sources: The PubMed (MEDLINE), Web of Science, PEDro, Cochrane Library, SPORTDiscus (EBSCO), ScienceDirect, and Scopus databases were searched to 23 November 2018. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: Studies were included if they prospectively applied a criteria-based RTS decision-making process for patients with LAS injury, but were excluded if they merely gathered outcome measures at the RTS time point. Studies were also excluded if patients were recovering from ankle fracture, high ankle sprain, medial ankle sprain, chronic ankle instability or complex ankle injury. Results: No studies were identified that used a criteria-based RTS decision-making process for patients with LAS injury. We were unable to conduct a quantitative synthesis or meta-analysis, therefore we provide a narrative synthesis of relevant questionnaires, as well as clinical and functional assessments commonly used in studies retrieved in the search. Conclusion: There are currently no published evidence-based criteria to inform RTS decisions for patients with an LAS injury. Based on our narrative synthesis, we propose a number of variables that could be used to develop a criteria-based RTS decision paradigm. Future research should aim to reach consensus on these variables and apply them to actual RTS decisions within prospective study designs. Furthermore, we suggest that complex systems theory and the RTS continuum could be used to inform the development of an RTS decision-making paradigm for athletes with LAS injury.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061510982&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s40279-019-01071-3

DO - 10.1007/s40279-019-01071-3

M3 - Review article

JO - Sports Medicine

JF - Sports Medicine

SN - 0112-1642

ER -