Detailed assessment of low-back loads may not be worth the effort: A comparison of two methods for exposure-outcome assessment of low-back pain

P. Coenen; I. Kingma; C.R.L. Boot; P.M. Bongers; J.H. van Dieen

doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2015.06.005

Detailed assessment of low-back loads may not be worth the effort: A comparison of two methods for exposure-outcome assessment of low-back pain

P. Coenen, I. Kingma, C.R.L. Boot, P.M. Bongers, J.H. van Dieen

Public and occupational health

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Original language	Undefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)	322-330
Journal	Applied Ergonomics
Volume	51
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2015.06.005
Publication status	Published - 2015

Access to Document

10.1016/j.apergo.2015.06.005

Cite this

@article{475f63f5d4644c21ae0cb04a4fb985b6,

title = "Detailed assessment of low-back loads may not be worth the effort: A comparison of two methods for exposure-outcome assessment of low-back pain",

author = "P. Coenen and I. Kingma and C.R.L. Boot and P.M. Bongers and {van Dieen}, J.H.",

year = "2015",

doi = "10.1016/j.apergo.2015.06.005",

language = "Undefined/Unknown",

volume = "51",

pages = "322--330",

journal = "Applied Ergonomics",

issn = "0003-6870",

publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Detailed assessment of low-back loads may not be worth the effort: A comparison of two methods for exposure-outcome assessment of low-back pain

AU - Coenen, P.

AU - Kingma, I.

AU - Boot, C.R.L.

AU - Bongers, P.M.

AU - van Dieen, J.H.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

U2 - 10.1016/j.apergo.2015.06.005

DO - 10.1016/j.apergo.2015.06.005

M3 - Article

C2 - 26154229

VL - 51

SP - 322

EP - 330

JO - Applied Ergonomics

JF - Applied Ergonomics

SN - 0003-6870

ER -