TY - JOUR
T1 - Detection of memory impairment in the general population
T2 - screening by questionnaire and telephone compared to subsequent face-to-face assessment
AU - van Uffelen, Jannique G Z
AU - Chin A Paw, Marijke J M
AU - Klein, Martin
AU - van Mechelen, Willem
AU - Hopman-Rock, Marijke
N1 - (c) 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
PY - 2007/3
Y1 - 2007/3
N2 - BACKGROUND: Development of efficient methods for identifying subjects with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) from the general population is warranted, because these subjects represent an important group for (epidemiological) research purposes.OBJECTIVES: (1) To describe a two-step population screening for identifying adults with MCI from the general population for research purposes, by questionnaire and telephone; (2) to compare screening by telephone (method 1) to a subsequent face-to-face assessment (method 2).METHODS: In method 1, subjects with memory complaints were identified from the general population (n = 5491) by a postal questionnaire. Subsequently, cognitive status and memory were assessed in a telephone interview using the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status and the Ten Word Learning Test. Next, subjects with MCI according to method 1 were subjected to a face-to-face assessment for method 2, in which cognitive status and memory were assessed using the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT).RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-seven subjects completed both the telephone interview and the face-to-face assessment. Ninety-three subjects (41%) had MCI according to both methods. Seven subjects (3%) failed to meet MCI criteria according to method two because of an MMSE score <24; 127 subjects (56%) failed because of normal AVLT scores.CONCLUSION: (1) The two-step population screening was able to detect a considerable number of MCI-subjects in the general population; (2) agreement between both methods was moderate. Therefore, the method of recruiting subjects for (epidemiological) studies has to be taken into consideration when interpreting results of these studies.
AB - BACKGROUND: Development of efficient methods for identifying subjects with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) from the general population is warranted, because these subjects represent an important group for (epidemiological) research purposes.OBJECTIVES: (1) To describe a two-step population screening for identifying adults with MCI from the general population for research purposes, by questionnaire and telephone; (2) to compare screening by telephone (method 1) to a subsequent face-to-face assessment (method 2).METHODS: In method 1, subjects with memory complaints were identified from the general population (n = 5491) by a postal questionnaire. Subsequently, cognitive status and memory were assessed in a telephone interview using the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status and the Ten Word Learning Test. Next, subjects with MCI according to method 1 were subjected to a face-to-face assessment for method 2, in which cognitive status and memory were assessed using the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT).RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-seven subjects completed both the telephone interview and the face-to-face assessment. Ninety-three subjects (41%) had MCI according to both methods. Seven subjects (3%) failed to meet MCI criteria according to method two because of an MMSE score <24; 127 subjects (56%) failed because of normal AVLT scores.CONCLUSION: (1) The two-step population screening was able to detect a considerable number of MCI-subjects in the general population; (2) agreement between both methods was moderate. Therefore, the method of recruiting subjects for (epidemiological) studies has to be taken into consideration when interpreting results of these studies.
KW - Aged
KW - Aged, 80 and over
KW - Chi-Square Distribution
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Interviews as Topic
KW - Male
KW - Mass Screening/methods
KW - Memory Disorders/diagnosis
KW - Mental Status Schedule
KW - Postal Service
KW - Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
KW - Sensitivity and Specificity
KW - Statistics, Nonparametric
KW - Telephone
U2 - 10.1002/gps.1661
DO - 10.1002/gps.1661
M3 - Article
C2 - 17044136
SN - 0885-6230
VL - 22
SP - 203
EP - 210
JO - International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
JF - International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
IS - 3
ER -