TY - JOUR
T1 - Developing an e-learning course on the use of PRO measures in oncological practice
T2 - health care professionals’ preferences for learning content and methods
AU - Sztankay, Monika
AU - Wintner, Lisa M.
AU - Roggendorf, Sigrid
AU - Nordhausen, Thomas
AU - Dirven, Linda
AU - Taphoorn, Martin J. B.
AU - Leeuw, Irma M. Verdonck-de
AU - Velikova, Galina
AU - Bottomley, Andrew
AU - Kulis, Dagmara
AU - Kachel, Timo
AU - on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group
AU - Schmidt, Heike
N1 - Funding Information:
Open access funding provided by University of Innsbruck and Medical University of Innsbruck. The study was funded by the EORTC Quality of Life Group (grant number 001–2019).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Purpose: Implementation of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in clinical routine requires knowledge and competences regarding their use. In order to facilitate implementation, an e-learning course for health care professionals (HCPs) on the utilisation of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PROMs in oncological clinical practice is being developed. This study aimed to explore future users’ educational needs regarding content and learning methods. Methods: The sequential mixed methods approach was applied. A scoping literature review informed the guideline for qualitative interviews with HCPs with diverse professional backgrounds in oncology and cancer advocates recruited using a purposive sampling strategy. An international online survey was conducted to validate the qualitative findings. Results: Between December 2019 and May 2020, 73 interviews were conducted in 9 countries resulting in 8 topic areas (Basic information on PROs in clinical routine, Benefits of PRO assessments in clinical practice, Implementation of PRO assessments in clinical routine, Setup of PRO assessments for clinical application, Interpretation of PRO data, Integration of PROs into the communication with patients, Use of PROs in clinical practice, Self-management recommendations for patients based on PROs) subsequently presented in the online survey. The online survey (open between 3 June and 19 July 2020) was completed by 233 HCPs from 33 countries. The highest preference was indicated for content on interpretation of PRO data (97%), clinical benefits of assessing PRO data (95.3%) and implementation of routine PRO data assessment (94.8%). Regarding learning methods, participants indicated a high preference for practical examples that use a mixed approach of presentation (written, audio, video and interactive). Conclusion: Educational needs for an integration of PROs in communication in clinical care and coherent implementation strategies became evident. These results inform the development of an e-learning course to support HCPs in the clinical use of EORTC PRO measures.
AB - Purpose: Implementation of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in clinical routine requires knowledge and competences regarding their use. In order to facilitate implementation, an e-learning course for health care professionals (HCPs) on the utilisation of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PROMs in oncological clinical practice is being developed. This study aimed to explore future users’ educational needs regarding content and learning methods. Methods: The sequential mixed methods approach was applied. A scoping literature review informed the guideline for qualitative interviews with HCPs with diverse professional backgrounds in oncology and cancer advocates recruited using a purposive sampling strategy. An international online survey was conducted to validate the qualitative findings. Results: Between December 2019 and May 2020, 73 interviews were conducted in 9 countries resulting in 8 topic areas (Basic information on PROs in clinical routine, Benefits of PRO assessments in clinical practice, Implementation of PRO assessments in clinical routine, Setup of PRO assessments for clinical application, Interpretation of PRO data, Integration of PROs into the communication with patients, Use of PROs in clinical practice, Self-management recommendations for patients based on PROs) subsequently presented in the online survey. The online survey (open between 3 June and 19 July 2020) was completed by 233 HCPs from 33 countries. The highest preference was indicated for content on interpretation of PRO data (97%), clinical benefits of assessing PRO data (95.3%) and implementation of routine PRO data assessment (94.8%). Regarding learning methods, participants indicated a high preference for practical examples that use a mixed approach of presentation (written, audio, video and interactive). Conclusion: Educational needs for an integration of PROs in communication in clinical care and coherent implementation strategies became evident. These results inform the development of an e-learning course to support HCPs in the clinical use of EORTC PRO measures.
KW - Distant learning
KW - EORTC
KW - Implementation
KW - Oncology
KW - Patient-reported outcome measures
KW - Quality of life
KW - e-learning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85119486959&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00520-021-06676-x
DO - 10.1007/s00520-021-06676-x
M3 - Article
C2 - 34797424
SN - 0941-4355
JO - Supportive Care in Cancer
JF - Supportive Care in Cancer
ER -