Development of the BODY-Q Chest Module Evaluating Outcomes Following Chest Contouring Surgery

Anne F Klassen, Manraj Kaur, Lotte Poulsen, Craig Fielding, Daan Geerards, Tim C van de Grift, Maarten Hoogbergen, Claus Bogh Juhl, Mike Mikkelsen Lorenzen, Giancarlo McEvenue, Hugh McLean, Clayton Moliver, Margriet G Mullender, Vivek Panchapakesan, Jussi P Repo, Michael Rose, Jens Ahm Sørensen, René Klinkby Støving, Andrea L Pusic

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Plastic surgery to improve chest appearance is becoming increasingly popular. The BODY-Q is a patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument designed for weight loss and/or body contouring. In this paper, we describe the development of a new module for masculinizing chest contouring surgery.

METHODS: Qualitative methods were used to develop and refine the content of the BODY-Q Chest Module, which was subsequently field-tested in Canada, USA, Netherlands and Denmark between June 2016 and June 2017. Participants were men and trans men aged 16 years or older and seen for gynecomastia, weight loss or trans men chest surgery. Data were collected using either a web-based application or paper questionnaire. Rasch Measurement Theory (RMT) analysis was performed.

RESULTS: The sample included 739 participants (i.e., 174 gynecomastia, 224 weight loss, 341 gender confirming). RMT analysis refined a 10-item chest and 5-item nipple scale. All items had ordered thresholds and good item fit, and scales evidenced reliability, i.e., Person Separation Index and Cronbach's alpha values were 0.95 and 0.98 (chest scale) and 0.87 and 0.94 (nipple scale). Scores for both scales correlated more strongly with similar (satisfaction with the body) versus dissimilar (psychological and social function) BODY-Q scales. The mean score for the chest and nipples scales was significantly higher (p<0.001 on independent samples t-tests) in participants who were post-operative compared with pre-operative at the time of assessment.

CONCLUSION: This new BODY-Q Chest Module is a clinically meaningful and scientifically sound PRO instrument that can be used to measure outcomes for masculinizing chest contouring surgery.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1600-1608
Number of pages9
JournalPlastic and reconstructive surgery
Volume142
Issue number6
Early online date31 Aug 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2018

Cite this

Klassen, Anne F ; Kaur, Manraj ; Poulsen, Lotte ; Fielding, Craig ; Geerards, Daan ; van de Grift, Tim C ; Hoogbergen, Maarten ; Juhl, Claus Bogh ; Lorenzen, Mike Mikkelsen ; McEvenue, Giancarlo ; McLean, Hugh ; Moliver, Clayton ; Mullender, Margriet G ; Panchapakesan, Vivek ; Repo, Jussi P ; Rose, Michael ; Sørensen, Jens Ahm ; Støving, René Klinkby ; Pusic, Andrea L. / Development of the BODY-Q Chest Module Evaluating Outcomes Following Chest Contouring Surgery. In: Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2018 ; Vol. 142, No. 6. pp. 1600-1608.
@article{88a62b94eb1f4871a1478bbc6c59a31d,
title = "Development of the BODY-Q Chest Module Evaluating Outcomes Following Chest Contouring Surgery",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Plastic surgery to improve chest appearance is becoming increasingly popular. The BODY-Q is a patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument designed for weight loss and/or body contouring. In this paper, we describe the development of a new module for masculinizing chest contouring surgery.METHODS: Qualitative methods were used to develop and refine the content of the BODY-Q Chest Module, which was subsequently field-tested in Canada, USA, Netherlands and Denmark between June 2016 and June 2017. Participants were men and trans men aged 16 years or older and seen for gynecomastia, weight loss or trans men chest surgery. Data were collected using either a web-based application or paper questionnaire. Rasch Measurement Theory (RMT) analysis was performed.RESULTS: The sample included 739 participants (i.e., 174 gynecomastia, 224 weight loss, 341 gender confirming). RMT analysis refined a 10-item chest and 5-item nipple scale. All items had ordered thresholds and good item fit, and scales evidenced reliability, i.e., Person Separation Index and Cronbach's alpha values were 0.95 and 0.98 (chest scale) and 0.87 and 0.94 (nipple scale). Scores for both scales correlated more strongly with similar (satisfaction with the body) versus dissimilar (psychological and social function) BODY-Q scales. The mean score for the chest and nipples scales was significantly higher (p<0.001 on independent samples t-tests) in participants who were post-operative compared with pre-operative at the time of assessment.CONCLUSION: This new BODY-Q Chest Module is a clinically meaningful and scientifically sound PRO instrument that can be used to measure outcomes for masculinizing chest contouring surgery.",
author = "Klassen, {Anne F} and Manraj Kaur and Lotte Poulsen and Craig Fielding and Daan Geerards and {van de Grift}, {Tim C} and Maarten Hoogbergen and Juhl, {Claus Bogh} and Lorenzen, {Mike Mikkelsen} and Giancarlo McEvenue and Hugh McLean and Clayton Moliver and Mullender, {Margriet G} and Vivek Panchapakesan and Repo, {Jussi P} and Michael Rose and S{\o}rensen, {Jens Ahm} and St{\o}ving, {Ren{\'e} Klinkby} and Pusic, {Andrea L}",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/PRS.0000000000004978",
language = "English",
volume = "142",
pages = "1600--1608",
journal = "Plastic and reconstructive surgery",
issn = "0032-1052",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

Klassen, AF, Kaur, M, Poulsen, L, Fielding, C, Geerards, D, van de Grift, TC, Hoogbergen, M, Juhl, CB, Lorenzen, MM, McEvenue, G, McLean, H, Moliver, C, Mullender, MG, Panchapakesan, V, Repo, JP, Rose, M, Sørensen, JA, Støving, RK & Pusic, AL 2018, 'Development of the BODY-Q Chest Module Evaluating Outcomes Following Chest Contouring Surgery' Plastic and reconstructive surgery, vol. 142, no. 6, pp. 1600-1608. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000004978

Development of the BODY-Q Chest Module Evaluating Outcomes Following Chest Contouring Surgery. / Klassen, Anne F; Kaur, Manraj; Poulsen, Lotte; Fielding, Craig; Geerards, Daan; van de Grift, Tim C; Hoogbergen, Maarten; Juhl, Claus Bogh; Lorenzen, Mike Mikkelsen; McEvenue, Giancarlo; McLean, Hugh; Moliver, Clayton; Mullender, Margriet G; Panchapakesan, Vivek; Repo, Jussi P; Rose, Michael; Sørensen, Jens Ahm; Støving, René Klinkby; Pusic, Andrea L.

In: Plastic and reconstructive surgery, Vol. 142, No. 6, 01.12.2018, p. 1600-1608.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development of the BODY-Q Chest Module Evaluating Outcomes Following Chest Contouring Surgery

AU - Klassen, Anne F

AU - Kaur, Manraj

AU - Poulsen, Lotte

AU - Fielding, Craig

AU - Geerards, Daan

AU - van de Grift, Tim C

AU - Hoogbergen, Maarten

AU - Juhl, Claus Bogh

AU - Lorenzen, Mike Mikkelsen

AU - McEvenue, Giancarlo

AU - McLean, Hugh

AU - Moliver, Clayton

AU - Mullender, Margriet G

AU - Panchapakesan, Vivek

AU - Repo, Jussi P

AU - Rose, Michael

AU - Sørensen, Jens Ahm

AU - Støving, René Klinkby

AU - Pusic, Andrea L

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Plastic surgery to improve chest appearance is becoming increasingly popular. The BODY-Q is a patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument designed for weight loss and/or body contouring. In this paper, we describe the development of a new module for masculinizing chest contouring surgery.METHODS: Qualitative methods were used to develop and refine the content of the BODY-Q Chest Module, which was subsequently field-tested in Canada, USA, Netherlands and Denmark between June 2016 and June 2017. Participants were men and trans men aged 16 years or older and seen for gynecomastia, weight loss or trans men chest surgery. Data were collected using either a web-based application or paper questionnaire. Rasch Measurement Theory (RMT) analysis was performed.RESULTS: The sample included 739 participants (i.e., 174 gynecomastia, 224 weight loss, 341 gender confirming). RMT analysis refined a 10-item chest and 5-item nipple scale. All items had ordered thresholds and good item fit, and scales evidenced reliability, i.e., Person Separation Index and Cronbach's alpha values were 0.95 and 0.98 (chest scale) and 0.87 and 0.94 (nipple scale). Scores for both scales correlated more strongly with similar (satisfaction with the body) versus dissimilar (psychological and social function) BODY-Q scales. The mean score for the chest and nipples scales was significantly higher (p<0.001 on independent samples t-tests) in participants who were post-operative compared with pre-operative at the time of assessment.CONCLUSION: This new BODY-Q Chest Module is a clinically meaningful and scientifically sound PRO instrument that can be used to measure outcomes for masculinizing chest contouring surgery.

AB - BACKGROUND: Plastic surgery to improve chest appearance is becoming increasingly popular. The BODY-Q is a patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument designed for weight loss and/or body contouring. In this paper, we describe the development of a new module for masculinizing chest contouring surgery.METHODS: Qualitative methods were used to develop and refine the content of the BODY-Q Chest Module, which was subsequently field-tested in Canada, USA, Netherlands and Denmark between June 2016 and June 2017. Participants were men and trans men aged 16 years or older and seen for gynecomastia, weight loss or trans men chest surgery. Data were collected using either a web-based application or paper questionnaire. Rasch Measurement Theory (RMT) analysis was performed.RESULTS: The sample included 739 participants (i.e., 174 gynecomastia, 224 weight loss, 341 gender confirming). RMT analysis refined a 10-item chest and 5-item nipple scale. All items had ordered thresholds and good item fit, and scales evidenced reliability, i.e., Person Separation Index and Cronbach's alpha values were 0.95 and 0.98 (chest scale) and 0.87 and 0.94 (nipple scale). Scores for both scales correlated more strongly with similar (satisfaction with the body) versus dissimilar (psychological and social function) BODY-Q scales. The mean score for the chest and nipples scales was significantly higher (p<0.001 on independent samples t-tests) in participants who were post-operative compared with pre-operative at the time of assessment.CONCLUSION: This new BODY-Q Chest Module is a clinically meaningful and scientifically sound PRO instrument that can be used to measure outcomes for masculinizing chest contouring surgery.

U2 - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004978

DO - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004978

M3 - Article

VL - 142

SP - 1600

EP - 1608

JO - Plastic and reconstructive surgery

JF - Plastic and reconstructive surgery

SN - 0032-1052

IS - 6

ER -