Diagnostic and prognostic performance to detect Alzheimer’s disease and clinical progression of a novel assay for plasma p-tau217

Colin Groot*, Claudia Cicognola, Divya Bali, Gallen Triana-Baltzer, Jeffrey L. Dage, Michael J. Pontecorvo, Hartmuth C. Kolb, Rik Osssenkoppele, Shorena Janelidze, Oskar Hansson*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review


Background: Recent advances in disease-modifying treatments highlight the need for accurately identifying individuals in early Alzheimer’s disease (AD) stages and for monitoring of treatment effects. Plasma measurements of phosphorylated tau (p-tau) are a promising biomarker for AD, but different assays show varying diagnostic and prognostic accuracies. The objective of this study was to determine the clinical performance of a novel plasma p-tau217 (p-tau217) assay, p-tau217+ Janssen, and perform a head-to-head comparison to an established assay, plasma p-tau217 Lilly, within two independent cohorts . Methods: The study consisted of two cohorts, cohort 1 (27 controls and 25 individuals with mild-cognitive impairment [MCI]) and cohort 2 including 147 individuals with MCI at baseline who were followed for an average of 4.92 (SD 2.09) years. Receiver operating characteristic analyses were used to assess the performance of both assays to detect amyloid-β status (+/−) in CSF, distinguish MCI from controls, and identify subjects who will convert from MCI to AD dementia. General linear and linear mixed-effects analyses were used to assess the associations between p-tau and baseline, and annual change in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores. Spearman correlations were used to assess the associations between the two plasma measures, and Bland-Altmann plots were examined to assess the agreement between the assays. Results: Both assays showed similar performance in detecting amyloid-β status in CSF (plasma p-tau217+ Janssen AUC = 0.91 vs plasma p-tau217 Lilly AUC = 0.89), distinguishing MCI from controls (plasma p-tau217+ Janssen AUC = 0.91 vs plasma p-tau217 Lilly AUC = 0.91), and predicting future conversion from MCI to AD dementia (plasma p-tau217+ Janssen AUC = 0.88 vs p-tau217 Lilly AUC = 0.89). Both assays were similarly related to baseline (plasma p-tau217+ Janssen rho = −0.39 vs p-tau217 Lilly rho = −0.35), and annual change in MMSE scores (plasma p-tau217+ Janssenr = −0.45 vs p-tau217 Lillyr = −0.41). Correlations between the two plasma measures were rho = 0.69, p < 0.001 in cohort 1 and rho = 0.70, p < 0.001 in cohort 2. Bland-Altmann plots revealed good agreement between plasma p-tau217+ Janssen and plasma p-tau217 Lilly in both cohorts (cohort 1, 51/52 [98%] within 95%CI; cohort 2, 139/147 [95%] within 95%CI). Conclusions: Taken together, our results indicate good diagnostic and prognostic performance of the plasma p-tau217+ Janssen assay, similar to the p-tau217 Lilly assay.

Original languageEnglish
Article number67
JournalAlzheimer's Research and Therapy
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2022

Cite this