Diagnostic labelling as determinant of antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory tract episodes in general practice

Huug J. Van Duijn, Marijke M. Kuyvenhoven, Hanneke M. Tiebosch, François G. Schellevis, Theo J.M. Verheij

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background. Next to other GP characteristics, diagnostic labelling (the proportion of acute respiratory tract (RT) episodes to be labelled as infections) probably contributes to a higher volume of antibiotic prescriptions for acute RT episodes. However, it is unknown whether there is an independent association between diagnostic labelling and the volume of prescribed antibiotics, or whether diagnostic labelling is associated with the number of presented acute RT episodes and consequently with the number of antibiotics prescribed per patient per year. Methods. Data were used from the Second Dutch National Survey of General Practice (DNSGP-2) with 163 GPs from 85 Dutch practices, serving a population of 359,625 patients. Data over a 12 month period were analysed by means of multiple linear regression analysis. Main outcome measure was the volume of antibiotic prescriptions for acute RT episodes per 1,000 patients. Results. The incidence was 236.9 acute RT episodes/1,000 patients. GPs labelled about 70% of acute RT episodes as infections, and antibiotics were prescribed in 41% of all acute RT episodes. A higher incidence of acute RT episodes (beta 0.67), a stronger inclination to label episodes as infections (beta 0.24), a stronger endorsement of the need of antibiotics in case of white spots in the throat (beta 0.11) and being male (beta 0.11) were independent determinants of the prescribed volume of antibiotics for acute RT episodes, whereas diagnostic labelling was not correlated with the incidence of acute RT episodes. Conclusion. Diagnostic labelling is a relevant factor in GPs' antibiotic prescribing independent from the incidence of acute RT episodes. Therefore, quality assurance programs and postgraduate courses should emphasise to use evidence based prognostic criteria (e.g. chronic respiratory co-morbidity and old age) as an indication to prescribe antibiotics in stead of single inflammation signs or diagnostic labels.

Original languageEnglish
Article number55
JournalBMC Family Practice
Volume8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 Oct 2007

Cite this

Van Duijn, Huug J. ; Kuyvenhoven, Marijke M. ; Tiebosch, Hanneke M. ; Schellevis, François G. ; Verheij, Theo J.M. / Diagnostic labelling as determinant of antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory tract episodes in general practice. In: BMC Family Practice. 2007 ; Vol. 8.
@article{d50507e53cd34d9181593dd77df87531,
title = "Diagnostic labelling as determinant of antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory tract episodes in general practice",
abstract = "Background. Next to other GP characteristics, diagnostic labelling (the proportion of acute respiratory tract (RT) episodes to be labelled as infections) probably contributes to a higher volume of antibiotic prescriptions for acute RT episodes. However, it is unknown whether there is an independent association between diagnostic labelling and the volume of prescribed antibiotics, or whether diagnostic labelling is associated with the number of presented acute RT episodes and consequently with the number of antibiotics prescribed per patient per year. Methods. Data were used from the Second Dutch National Survey of General Practice (DNSGP-2) with 163 GPs from 85 Dutch practices, serving a population of 359,625 patients. Data over a 12 month period were analysed by means of multiple linear regression analysis. Main outcome measure was the volume of antibiotic prescriptions for acute RT episodes per 1,000 patients. Results. The incidence was 236.9 acute RT episodes/1,000 patients. GPs labelled about 70{\%} of acute RT episodes as infections, and antibiotics were prescribed in 41{\%} of all acute RT episodes. A higher incidence of acute RT episodes (beta 0.67), a stronger inclination to label episodes as infections (beta 0.24), a stronger endorsement of the need of antibiotics in case of white spots in the throat (beta 0.11) and being male (beta 0.11) were independent determinants of the prescribed volume of antibiotics for acute RT episodes, whereas diagnostic labelling was not correlated with the incidence of acute RT episodes. Conclusion. Diagnostic labelling is a relevant factor in GPs' antibiotic prescribing independent from the incidence of acute RT episodes. Therefore, quality assurance programs and postgraduate courses should emphasise to use evidence based prognostic criteria (e.g. chronic respiratory co-morbidity and old age) as an indication to prescribe antibiotics in stead of single inflammation signs or diagnostic labels.",
author = "{Van Duijn}, {Huug J.} and Kuyvenhoven, {Marijke M.} and Tiebosch, {Hanneke M.} and Schellevis, {Fran{\cc}ois G.} and Verheij, {Theo J.M.}",
year = "2007",
month = "10",
day = "29",
doi = "10.1186/1471-2296-8-55",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
journal = "BMC Family Practice",
issn = "1471-2296",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

Diagnostic labelling as determinant of antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory tract episodes in general practice. / Van Duijn, Huug J.; Kuyvenhoven, Marijke M.; Tiebosch, Hanneke M.; Schellevis, François G.; Verheij, Theo J.M.

In: BMC Family Practice, Vol. 8, 55, 29.10.2007.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diagnostic labelling as determinant of antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory tract episodes in general practice

AU - Van Duijn, Huug J.

AU - Kuyvenhoven, Marijke M.

AU - Tiebosch, Hanneke M.

AU - Schellevis, François G.

AU - Verheij, Theo J.M.

PY - 2007/10/29

Y1 - 2007/10/29

N2 - Background. Next to other GP characteristics, diagnostic labelling (the proportion of acute respiratory tract (RT) episodes to be labelled as infections) probably contributes to a higher volume of antibiotic prescriptions for acute RT episodes. However, it is unknown whether there is an independent association between diagnostic labelling and the volume of prescribed antibiotics, or whether diagnostic labelling is associated with the number of presented acute RT episodes and consequently with the number of antibiotics prescribed per patient per year. Methods. Data were used from the Second Dutch National Survey of General Practice (DNSGP-2) with 163 GPs from 85 Dutch practices, serving a population of 359,625 patients. Data over a 12 month period were analysed by means of multiple linear regression analysis. Main outcome measure was the volume of antibiotic prescriptions for acute RT episodes per 1,000 patients. Results. The incidence was 236.9 acute RT episodes/1,000 patients. GPs labelled about 70% of acute RT episodes as infections, and antibiotics were prescribed in 41% of all acute RT episodes. A higher incidence of acute RT episodes (beta 0.67), a stronger inclination to label episodes as infections (beta 0.24), a stronger endorsement of the need of antibiotics in case of white spots in the throat (beta 0.11) and being male (beta 0.11) were independent determinants of the prescribed volume of antibiotics for acute RT episodes, whereas diagnostic labelling was not correlated with the incidence of acute RT episodes. Conclusion. Diagnostic labelling is a relevant factor in GPs' antibiotic prescribing independent from the incidence of acute RT episodes. Therefore, quality assurance programs and postgraduate courses should emphasise to use evidence based prognostic criteria (e.g. chronic respiratory co-morbidity and old age) as an indication to prescribe antibiotics in stead of single inflammation signs or diagnostic labels.

AB - Background. Next to other GP characteristics, diagnostic labelling (the proportion of acute respiratory tract (RT) episodes to be labelled as infections) probably contributes to a higher volume of antibiotic prescriptions for acute RT episodes. However, it is unknown whether there is an independent association between diagnostic labelling and the volume of prescribed antibiotics, or whether diagnostic labelling is associated with the number of presented acute RT episodes and consequently with the number of antibiotics prescribed per patient per year. Methods. Data were used from the Second Dutch National Survey of General Practice (DNSGP-2) with 163 GPs from 85 Dutch practices, serving a population of 359,625 patients. Data over a 12 month period were analysed by means of multiple linear regression analysis. Main outcome measure was the volume of antibiotic prescriptions for acute RT episodes per 1,000 patients. Results. The incidence was 236.9 acute RT episodes/1,000 patients. GPs labelled about 70% of acute RT episodes as infections, and antibiotics were prescribed in 41% of all acute RT episodes. A higher incidence of acute RT episodes (beta 0.67), a stronger inclination to label episodes as infections (beta 0.24), a stronger endorsement of the need of antibiotics in case of white spots in the throat (beta 0.11) and being male (beta 0.11) were independent determinants of the prescribed volume of antibiotics for acute RT episodes, whereas diagnostic labelling was not correlated with the incidence of acute RT episodes. Conclusion. Diagnostic labelling is a relevant factor in GPs' antibiotic prescribing independent from the incidence of acute RT episodes. Therefore, quality assurance programs and postgraduate courses should emphasise to use evidence based prognostic criteria (e.g. chronic respiratory co-morbidity and old age) as an indication to prescribe antibiotics in stead of single inflammation signs or diagnostic labels.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35448931170&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1471-2296-8-55

DO - 10.1186/1471-2296-8-55

M3 - Article

VL - 8

JO - BMC Family Practice

JF - BMC Family Practice

SN - 1471-2296

M1 - 55

ER -