Dialogue in Evaluation: A Hermeneutic Perspective

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Dialogue is crucial to evaluation. Through dialogue, people are invited to develop new, shared ways of seeing and acting. From a hermeneutic perspective, dialogue implies consensus, based upon shared meanings and oriented towards reaching agreement. Dialogue also implies disagreement, in the form of a conflict between different, rival stories. The role of the evaluator is to enter into dialogue with people participating in practice. It is also to stimulate a dialogue between participants. This requires support for marginalized voices, but also attention to the voices of those who are in power. Only if the evaluator tries to understand the values endorsed in a practice and is prepared to listen to the stories of all parties involved, can evaluation become a practice to which all participants contribute.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)253-263
Number of pages11
JournalEvaluation
Volume7
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2001

Cite this

@article{48c97f1f669d41e0a3d7ea510e37834d,
title = "Dialogue in Evaluation: A Hermeneutic Perspective",
abstract = "Dialogue is crucial to evaluation. Through dialogue, people are invited to develop new, shared ways of seeing and acting. From a hermeneutic perspective, dialogue implies consensus, based upon shared meanings and oriented towards reaching agreement. Dialogue also implies disagreement, in the form of a conflict between different, rival stories. The role of the evaluator is to enter into dialogue with people participating in practice. It is also to stimulate a dialogue between participants. This requires support for marginalized voices, but also attention to the voices of those who are in power. Only if the evaluator tries to understand the values endorsed in a practice and is prepared to listen to the stories of all parties involved, can evaluation become a practice to which all participants contribute.",
keywords = "consensus, empowerment, hermeneutic understanding, stories, tradition",
author = "Widdershoven, {Guy A M}",
year = "2001",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/13563890122209676",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "253--263",
journal = "Evaluation",
issn = "1356-3890",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

Dialogue in Evaluation : A Hermeneutic Perspective. / Widdershoven, Guy A M.

In: Evaluation, Vol. 7, No. 2, 01.04.2001, p. 253-263.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dialogue in Evaluation

T2 - A Hermeneutic Perspective

AU - Widdershoven, Guy A M

PY - 2001/4/1

Y1 - 2001/4/1

N2 - Dialogue is crucial to evaluation. Through dialogue, people are invited to develop new, shared ways of seeing and acting. From a hermeneutic perspective, dialogue implies consensus, based upon shared meanings and oriented towards reaching agreement. Dialogue also implies disagreement, in the form of a conflict between different, rival stories. The role of the evaluator is to enter into dialogue with people participating in practice. It is also to stimulate a dialogue between participants. This requires support for marginalized voices, but also attention to the voices of those who are in power. Only if the evaluator tries to understand the values endorsed in a practice and is prepared to listen to the stories of all parties involved, can evaluation become a practice to which all participants contribute.

AB - Dialogue is crucial to evaluation. Through dialogue, people are invited to develop new, shared ways of seeing and acting. From a hermeneutic perspective, dialogue implies consensus, based upon shared meanings and oriented towards reaching agreement. Dialogue also implies disagreement, in the form of a conflict between different, rival stories. The role of the evaluator is to enter into dialogue with people participating in practice. It is also to stimulate a dialogue between participants. This requires support for marginalized voices, but also attention to the voices of those who are in power. Only if the evaluator tries to understand the values endorsed in a practice and is prepared to listen to the stories of all parties involved, can evaluation become a practice to which all participants contribute.

KW - consensus

KW - empowerment

KW - hermeneutic understanding

KW - stories

KW - tradition

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038096003&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/13563890122209676

DO - 10.1177/13563890122209676

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 253

EP - 263

JO - Evaluation

JF - Evaluation

SN - 1356-3890

IS - 2

ER -