Does pain-catastrophising mediate the effect of tai chi on treatment outcomes for people with low back pain? Complementary Therapies in Medicine

A.M. Hall, S. J. Kamper, R. Emsley, C. G. Maher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Objectives: There is evidence to support the effectiveness of tai chi for reducing pain-related symptoms across multiple musculoskeletal conditions, however, the mechanism(s) are unclear. This study explores the role of pain-catastrophising as a possible mediator in the relationship between practising tai chi and back pain symptoms. Design: Exploratory mediation analyses using a Baron and Kenny approach and bootstrapping methods were employed as a secondary analysis of data from a previously published randomised controlled trial. Setting: Adults with persistent low back pain were recruited via community advertisement in Sydney, NSW, Australia. Interventions: A 10-week tai chi intervention and a wait-list control. Main outcome measures: Patients completed self-assessments of pain intensity and bothersomeness using 0-10 numerical rating scales, disability using the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire and pain catastrophising using the Pain Coping Strategies Questionnaire pre and post intervention. Results: The results suggest partial mediation, by which a reduction in catastrophising explained approximately 1/3 of the effect on pain intensity and bothersomeness and 2/3 of the effect on disability. Conclusion: As the first known mediation analysis of tai chi for reducing low back pain-symptoms, it provides initial evidence that it may do so by having an effect on cognitive appraisal outcomes such as pain-catastrophising and information for choosing appropriate process measures for future studies. As tai chi is growing in popularity as an alternative treatment for patients with chronic musculoskeletal conditions, it is important to gain a better understanding of how it might work using confirmatory mediation analysis alongside future RCTs. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)61-66
Number of pages6
JournalComplement. Ther. Med.
Volume25
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Cite this

@article{2782a2d0b5d74ab89ab6da7c41592082,
title = "Does pain-catastrophising mediate the effect of tai chi on treatment outcomes for people with low back pain?: Complementary Therapies in Medicine",
abstract = "Objectives: There is evidence to support the effectiveness of tai chi for reducing pain-related symptoms across multiple musculoskeletal conditions, however, the mechanism(s) are unclear. This study explores the role of pain-catastrophising as a possible mediator in the relationship between practising tai chi and back pain symptoms. Design: Exploratory mediation analyses using a Baron and Kenny approach and bootstrapping methods were employed as a secondary analysis of data from a previously published randomised controlled trial. Setting: Adults with persistent low back pain were recruited via community advertisement in Sydney, NSW, Australia. Interventions: A 10-week tai chi intervention and a wait-list control. Main outcome measures: Patients completed self-assessments of pain intensity and bothersomeness using 0-10 numerical rating scales, disability using the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire and pain catastrophising using the Pain Coping Strategies Questionnaire pre and post intervention. Results: The results suggest partial mediation, by which a reduction in catastrophising explained approximately 1/3 of the effect on pain intensity and bothersomeness and 2/3 of the effect on disability. Conclusion: As the first known mediation analysis of tai chi for reducing low back pain-symptoms, it provides initial evidence that it may do so by having an effect on cognitive appraisal outcomes such as pain-catastrophising and information for choosing appropriate process measures for future studies. As tai chi is growing in popularity as an alternative treatment for patients with chronic musculoskeletal conditions, it is important to gain a better understanding of how it might work using confirmatory mediation analysis alongside future RCTs. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd.",
author = "A.M. Hall and Kamper, {S. J.} and R. Emsley and Maher, {C. G.}",
note = "ISI Document Delivery No.: DK3FB Times Cited: 1 Cited Reference Count: 23 Hall, Amanda M. Kamper, Steven J. Emsley, Richard Maher, Christopher G. Emsley, Richard/N-1342-2016 Emsley, Richard/0000-0002-1218-675X EIPRS PhD scholarship from the Australian Government; Canadian Institute for Health Research We would like to acknowledge the following fellowship funding bodies of the lead author. Amanda M Hall was funded by an EIPRS PhD scholarship from the Australian Government at the time the randomised controlled trial was conducted and is currently funded by the Canadian Institute for Health Research as a Post-Doctoral Research Fellow. 1 6 10 CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE EDINBURGH COMPLEMENT THER MED",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1016/j.ctim.2015.12.013",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "61--66",
journal = "Complement. Ther. Med.",
issn = "0965-2299",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",

}

Does pain-catastrophising mediate the effect of tai chi on treatment outcomes for people with low back pain? Complementary Therapies in Medicine. / Hall, A.M.; Kamper, S. J.; Emsley, R.; Maher, C. G.

In: Complement. Ther. Med., Vol. 25, 2016, p. 61-66.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does pain-catastrophising mediate the effect of tai chi on treatment outcomes for people with low back pain?

T2 - Complementary Therapies in Medicine

AU - Hall, A.M.

AU - Kamper, S. J.

AU - Emsley, R.

AU - Maher, C. G.

N1 - ISI Document Delivery No.: DK3FB Times Cited: 1 Cited Reference Count: 23 Hall, Amanda M. Kamper, Steven J. Emsley, Richard Maher, Christopher G. Emsley, Richard/N-1342-2016 Emsley, Richard/0000-0002-1218-675X EIPRS PhD scholarship from the Australian Government; Canadian Institute for Health Research We would like to acknowledge the following fellowship funding bodies of the lead author. Amanda M Hall was funded by an EIPRS PhD scholarship from the Australian Government at the time the randomised controlled trial was conducted and is currently funded by the Canadian Institute for Health Research as a Post-Doctoral Research Fellow. 1 6 10 CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE EDINBURGH COMPLEMENT THER MED

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Objectives: There is evidence to support the effectiveness of tai chi for reducing pain-related symptoms across multiple musculoskeletal conditions, however, the mechanism(s) are unclear. This study explores the role of pain-catastrophising as a possible mediator in the relationship between practising tai chi and back pain symptoms. Design: Exploratory mediation analyses using a Baron and Kenny approach and bootstrapping methods were employed as a secondary analysis of data from a previously published randomised controlled trial. Setting: Adults with persistent low back pain were recruited via community advertisement in Sydney, NSW, Australia. Interventions: A 10-week tai chi intervention and a wait-list control. Main outcome measures: Patients completed self-assessments of pain intensity and bothersomeness using 0-10 numerical rating scales, disability using the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire and pain catastrophising using the Pain Coping Strategies Questionnaire pre and post intervention. Results: The results suggest partial mediation, by which a reduction in catastrophising explained approximately 1/3 of the effect on pain intensity and bothersomeness and 2/3 of the effect on disability. Conclusion: As the first known mediation analysis of tai chi for reducing low back pain-symptoms, it provides initial evidence that it may do so by having an effect on cognitive appraisal outcomes such as pain-catastrophising and information for choosing appropriate process measures for future studies. As tai chi is growing in popularity as an alternative treatment for patients with chronic musculoskeletal conditions, it is important to gain a better understanding of how it might work using confirmatory mediation analysis alongside future RCTs. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

AB - Objectives: There is evidence to support the effectiveness of tai chi for reducing pain-related symptoms across multiple musculoskeletal conditions, however, the mechanism(s) are unclear. This study explores the role of pain-catastrophising as a possible mediator in the relationship between practising tai chi and back pain symptoms. Design: Exploratory mediation analyses using a Baron and Kenny approach and bootstrapping methods were employed as a secondary analysis of data from a previously published randomised controlled trial. Setting: Adults with persistent low back pain were recruited via community advertisement in Sydney, NSW, Australia. Interventions: A 10-week tai chi intervention and a wait-list control. Main outcome measures: Patients completed self-assessments of pain intensity and bothersomeness using 0-10 numerical rating scales, disability using the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire and pain catastrophising using the Pain Coping Strategies Questionnaire pre and post intervention. Results: The results suggest partial mediation, by which a reduction in catastrophising explained approximately 1/3 of the effect on pain intensity and bothersomeness and 2/3 of the effect on disability. Conclusion: As the first known mediation analysis of tai chi for reducing low back pain-symptoms, it provides initial evidence that it may do so by having an effect on cognitive appraisal outcomes such as pain-catastrophising and information for choosing appropriate process measures for future studies. As tai chi is growing in popularity as an alternative treatment for patients with chronic musculoskeletal conditions, it is important to gain a better understanding of how it might work using confirmatory mediation analysis alongside future RCTs. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

U2 - 10.1016/j.ctim.2015.12.013

DO - 10.1016/j.ctim.2015.12.013

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 61

EP - 66

JO - Complement. Ther. Med.

JF - Complement. Ther. Med.

SN - 0965-2299

ER -