Donor sclera versus bovine pericardium as patch graft material in glaucoma implant surgery and the impact of a drainage suture

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the use of human donor sclera with bovine pericardium as patch graft material for a glaucoma drainage device (GDD), with respect to the incidence of tube exposure, and to study the role of a drainage suture.

METHODS: All GDD surgeries between 2010 and 2014 performed at the VU Medical Center were examined in this comparative, retrospective cohort study. A total of 244 cases were included; 163 in the human donor sclera cohort and 81 in the bovine pericardium cohort with a median follow-up of 31 and 36 months, respectively. The primary outcome measure was occurrence of tube exposure. Survival analysis for tube exposure was carried out and Kaplan-Meier curves compared. Secondary outcomes were postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP), number of glaucoma medications and the effect of a drainage suture.

RESULTS: In the bovine pericardium cohort, eleven (13.6%) eyes developed tube exposure compared to none in the human donor sclera cohort. Their Kaplan-Meier survival curves differed significantly from each other (χ² = 21.1, p < 0.001, log-rank test). Mean IOP and number of glaucoma medications did not differ significantly between patch graft materials at three months of follow-up. The use of a drainage suture directly lowered IOP after surgery in both cohorts. Within the bovine pericardium cohort, eyes with a drainage suture experienced more tube exposure, although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.09).

CONCLUSION: Human donor sclera leads to less tube exposure than bovine pericardium. A drainage suture directly lowers IOP after surgery. With bovine pericardium, but not with donor sclera, exposure tends to be enhanced by a drainage suture.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)692-698
Number of pages7
JournalActa Ophthalmologica
Volume96
Issue number7
Early online date10 Jul 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2018

Cite this