Effects of fluorescent and nonfluorescent tracing methods on lymphocyte migration in vivo

Martijn A Nolte, Georg Kraal, Reina E Mebius

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of fluorescent dyes to monitor in vivo cellular migration and proliferation has greatly expanded, but little is known about their potential influence on cell migration.

METHODS: Adoptive transfer studies of lymphocytes labeled with various dyes were performed, and their in vivo homing was compared with that of coinjected unlabeled control cells. In addition, in vitro migration and binding studies were performed to analyze the various steps of transmigration separately.

RESULTS: These data showed that the intracellular fluorescent dyes calcein acetoxymethyl ester, 2',7'-bis-(2-carboxyethyl)-5-(and-6)-carboxyfluorescein acetoxymethyl ester, 5-chloromethylfluorescein diacetate, 5-(and-6)-carboxyfluorescein diacetate, succinimidyl ester, and fluorescein isothiocyanate affect in vivo homing of especially B lymphocytes to lymphoid organs, without any direct effect on in vitro chemotactic or adhesive activity. The only label that did not affect migration was the extracellular and nonfluorescent molecule biotin, provided that the labeling was performed at room temperature. Interestingly, by using the highly versatile congenic Ly5.1-Ly5.2 system, we also demonstrated intrinsic differences in lymphocyte migration based on allelic differences.

CONCLUSIONS: Our data showed that fluorescent labeling of lymphocytes has a severe effect on their homing capacity in vivo. Labeling of cells with biotin appeared to be a good alternative for this purpose; however, if direct fluorescence is required, the negative effects on cell migration should be considered.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)35-44
Number of pages10
JournalCytometry Part B. Clinical Cytometry
Volume61
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2004

Cite this