Electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) in occupational and primary health care: A nation-wide survey among general practitioners, occupational physicians and hygienists in the Netherlands

Pauline Slottje, Imke van Moorselaar, Rob van Strien, Roel Vermeulen, Hans Kromhout, Anke Huss

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Subjects who attribute health complaints to every day levels of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields (EMF) have been referred to as electrohypersensitive (EHS). Previous surveys in Europe showed that 68–75% of general practitioners had ever been consulted on EHS. Given the lack of data on EHS in the Netherlands in the general population and on EHS in occupational settings, we performed a national survey among three professional groups that are likely in the first line of being consulted by EHS individuals. Results show that about one third of occupational hygienists, occupational physicians and general practitioners had ever been consulted by one or more EHS subjects. Many of these professionals considered a causal relationship between EMF and health complaints to some degree plausible, and their approach often included exposure reduction advice. Given the lack of scientific evidence for EHS and how low level EMF exposure could cause reported health complaints and given the finding that the majority of these professionals felt insufficiently informed about EMF and health, targeted information campaigns might assist them in their evidence based dealing with subjects who attribute symptoms to EMF.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)395-400
Number of pages6
JournalInternational Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health
Volume220
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2017

Cite this

@article{5fc0d780fb7641058b1a77e46ec42a6f,
title = "Electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) in occupational and primary health care: A nation-wide survey among general practitioners, occupational physicians and hygienists in the Netherlands",
abstract = "Subjects who attribute health complaints to every day levels of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields (EMF) have been referred to as electrohypersensitive (EHS). Previous surveys in Europe showed that 68–75{\%} of general practitioners had ever been consulted on EHS. Given the lack of data on EHS in the Netherlands in the general population and on EHS in occupational settings, we performed a national survey among three professional groups that are likely in the first line of being consulted by EHS individuals. Results show that about one third of occupational hygienists, occupational physicians and general practitioners had ever been consulted by one or more EHS subjects. Many of these professionals considered a causal relationship between EMF and health complaints to some degree plausible, and their approach often included exposure reduction advice. Given the lack of scientific evidence for EHS and how low level EMF exposure could cause reported health complaints and given the finding that the majority of these professionals felt insufficiently informed about EMF and health, targeted information campaigns might assist them in their evidence based dealing with subjects who attribute symptoms to EMF.",
keywords = "Electromagnetic fields, Electromagnetic hypersensitivity, General practice, Idiopathic environmental intolerance, Occupational exposure",
author = "Pauline Slottje and {van Moorselaar}, Imke and {van Strien}, Rob and Roel Vermeulen and Hans Kromhout and Anke Huss",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijheh.2016.11.013",
language = "English",
volume = "220",
pages = "395--400",
journal = "International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health",
issn = "1438-4639",
publisher = "Urban und Fischer Verlag Jena",
number = "2",

}

Electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) in occupational and primary health care : A nation-wide survey among general practitioners, occupational physicians and hygienists in the Netherlands. / Slottje, Pauline; van Moorselaar, Imke; van Strien, Rob; Vermeulen, Roel; Kromhout, Hans; Huss, Anke.

In: International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, Vol. 220, No. 2, 01.04.2017, p. 395-400.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) in occupational and primary health care

T2 - A nation-wide survey among general practitioners, occupational physicians and hygienists in the Netherlands

AU - Slottje, Pauline

AU - van Moorselaar, Imke

AU - van Strien, Rob

AU - Vermeulen, Roel

AU - Kromhout, Hans

AU - Huss, Anke

PY - 2017/4/1

Y1 - 2017/4/1

N2 - Subjects who attribute health complaints to every day levels of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields (EMF) have been referred to as electrohypersensitive (EHS). Previous surveys in Europe showed that 68–75% of general practitioners had ever been consulted on EHS. Given the lack of data on EHS in the Netherlands in the general population and on EHS in occupational settings, we performed a national survey among three professional groups that are likely in the first line of being consulted by EHS individuals. Results show that about one third of occupational hygienists, occupational physicians and general practitioners had ever been consulted by one or more EHS subjects. Many of these professionals considered a causal relationship between EMF and health complaints to some degree plausible, and their approach often included exposure reduction advice. Given the lack of scientific evidence for EHS and how low level EMF exposure could cause reported health complaints and given the finding that the majority of these professionals felt insufficiently informed about EMF and health, targeted information campaigns might assist them in their evidence based dealing with subjects who attribute symptoms to EMF.

AB - Subjects who attribute health complaints to every day levels of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields (EMF) have been referred to as electrohypersensitive (EHS). Previous surveys in Europe showed that 68–75% of general practitioners had ever been consulted on EHS. Given the lack of data on EHS in the Netherlands in the general population and on EHS in occupational settings, we performed a national survey among three professional groups that are likely in the first line of being consulted by EHS individuals. Results show that about one third of occupational hygienists, occupational physicians and general practitioners had ever been consulted by one or more EHS subjects. Many of these professionals considered a causal relationship between EMF and health complaints to some degree plausible, and their approach often included exposure reduction advice. Given the lack of scientific evidence for EHS and how low level EMF exposure could cause reported health complaints and given the finding that the majority of these professionals felt insufficiently informed about EMF and health, targeted information campaigns might assist them in their evidence based dealing with subjects who attribute symptoms to EMF.

KW - Electromagnetic fields

KW - Electromagnetic hypersensitivity

KW - General practice

KW - Idiopathic environmental intolerance

KW - Occupational exposure

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85008221161&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijheh.2016.11.013

DO - 10.1016/j.ijheh.2016.11.013

M3 - Article

VL - 220

SP - 395

EP - 400

JO - International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health

JF - International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health

SN - 1438-4639

IS - 2

ER -