TY - JOUR
T1 - Electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) in occupational and primary health care
T2 - A nation-wide survey among general practitioners, occupational physicians and hygienists in the Netherlands
AU - Slottje, Pauline
AU - van Moorselaar, Imke
AU - van Strien, Rob
AU - Vermeulen, Roel
AU - Kromhout, Hans
AU - Huss, Anke
PY - 2017/4/1
Y1 - 2017/4/1
N2 - Subjects who attribute health complaints to every day levels of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields (EMF) have been referred to as electrohypersensitive (EHS). Previous surveys in Europe showed that 68–75% of general practitioners had ever been consulted on EHS. Given the lack of data on EHS in the Netherlands in the general population and on EHS in occupational settings, we performed a national survey among three professional groups that are likely in the first line of being consulted by EHS individuals. Results show that about one third of occupational hygienists, occupational physicians and general practitioners had ever been consulted by one or more EHS subjects. Many of these professionals considered a causal relationship between EMF and health complaints to some degree plausible, and their approach often included exposure reduction advice. Given the lack of scientific evidence for EHS and how low level EMF exposure could cause reported health complaints and given the finding that the majority of these professionals felt insufficiently informed about EMF and health, targeted information campaigns might assist them in their evidence based dealing with subjects who attribute symptoms to EMF.
AB - Subjects who attribute health complaints to every day levels of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields (EMF) have been referred to as electrohypersensitive (EHS). Previous surveys in Europe showed that 68–75% of general practitioners had ever been consulted on EHS. Given the lack of data on EHS in the Netherlands in the general population and on EHS in occupational settings, we performed a national survey among three professional groups that are likely in the first line of being consulted by EHS individuals. Results show that about one third of occupational hygienists, occupational physicians and general practitioners had ever been consulted by one or more EHS subjects. Many of these professionals considered a causal relationship between EMF and health complaints to some degree plausible, and their approach often included exposure reduction advice. Given the lack of scientific evidence for EHS and how low level EMF exposure could cause reported health complaints and given the finding that the majority of these professionals felt insufficiently informed about EMF and health, targeted information campaigns might assist them in their evidence based dealing with subjects who attribute symptoms to EMF.
KW - Electromagnetic fields
KW - Electromagnetic hypersensitivity
KW - General practice
KW - Idiopathic environmental intolerance
KW - Occupational exposure
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85008221161&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijheh.2016.11.013
DO - 10.1016/j.ijheh.2016.11.013
M3 - Article
C2 - 27939136
AN - SCOPUS:85008221161
VL - 220
SP - 395
EP - 400
JO - International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health
JF - International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health
SN - 1438-4639
IS - 2
ER -