Epidemiology, practice of ventilation and outcome for patients at increased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications: LAS VEGAS - An observational study in 29 countries

Marcus J. Schultz*, Sabrine N.T. Hemmes, Ary Serpa Neto, Jan M. Binnekade, Jaume Canet, Goran Hedenstierna, Samir Jaber, Michael Hiesmayr, Markus W. Hollmann, Gary H. Mills, Marcos F. Vidal Melo, Rupert Pearse, Christian Putensen, Werner Schmid, Paolo Severgnini, Hermann Wrigge, Marcelo Gama De Abreu, Paolo Pelosi, LAS VEGAS investigators, Anne Duvekot

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review


Background: Limited information exists about the epidemiology and outcome of surgical patients at increased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs), and how intraoperative ventilation was managed in these patients. Objectives: To determine the incidence of surgical patients at increased risk of PPCs, and to compare the intraoperative ventilation management and postoperative outcomes with patients at low risk of PPCs. Design: This was a prospective international 1-week observational study using the 'Assess Respiratory Risk in Surgical Patients in Catalonia risk score' (ARISCAT score) for PPC for risk stratification. Patients and Setting: Adult patients requiring intraoperative ventilation during general anaesthesia for surgery in 146 hospitals across 29 countries. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was the incidence of patients at increased risk of PPCs based on the ARISCAT score. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative ventilatory management and clinical outcomes. Results: A total of 9864 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The incidence of patients at increased risk was 28.4%. The most frequently chosen tidal volume (VT) size was 500 ml, or 7 to 9 ml kg-1 predicted body weight, slightly lower in patients at increased risk of PPCs. Levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) were slightly higher in patients at increased risk of PPCs, with 14.3% receiving more than 5 cmH 2 O PEEP compared with 7.6% in patients at low risk of PPCs (P < 0.001). Patients with a predicted preoperative increased risk of PPCs developed PPCs more frequently: 19 versus 7%, relative risk (RR) 3.16 (95% confidence interval 2.76 to 3.61), P < 0.001) and had longer hospital stays. The only ventilatory factor associated with the occurrence of PPCs was the peak pressure. Conclusion: The incidence of patients with a predicted increased risk of PPCs is high. A large proportion of patients receive high VT and low PEEP levels. PPCs occur frequently in patients at increased risk, with worse clinical outcome.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)492-507
Number of pages16
JournalEuropean Journal of Anaesthesiology
Issue number8
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2017

Cite this