The authors regret that in the above article a misprint appears in table two presenting the evidence synthesis stratified by main type of sedentary behaviour and overall sedentary time: Not all high quality studies were printed in bold letter type. The correct Table is shown on page 2. 2 Evidence synthesis stratified by main type of sedentary behaviour and overall sedentary time (Table presented.) Bold indicates a high-quality study. *Note that the amount of studies under the stratified evidence synthesis do not count up in het combined evidence synthesis, due to two reasons. First, some studies examined types of sedentary behaviour that could not be classified in one of the four main types (e.g. subjective sitting time). As these additional types were only examined in its relationship with one health indicator, they were not considered as an additional main type of sedentary behaviour. Second, studies reporting relationships of more than one measurement type were counted once in the combined evidence synthesis, and were considered to add evidence when consistent findings were reported (i.e. ≥75% of the relationships showing results in the same direction). +, study adding evidence for a positive relationship; − study adding evidence for an inverse relationship; 0 study indicating no evidence for a relationship; BMI, body mass index; CRF, cardiorespiratory fitness; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; FMI, fat mass index; HC, hip circumference; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; MetS, metabolic syndrome; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SSF, sum of skinfolds; SLJ, standing long jump; TC/HDL-c, ratio of total cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; TV, television; WC, waist circumference. Reference 1. van Ekris E, Altenburg TM, Singh AS, Proper KI, Heymans MW, Chinapaw MJM. An evidence-update on the prospective relationship between childhood sedentary behaviour and biomedical health indicators: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev 2016; 17: 833–849. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12426.