TY - JOUR
T1 - Estimating the mediating effect of different biomarkers on the relation of alcohol consumption with the risk of type 2 diabetes
AU - Beulens, Joline W.J.
AU - van der Schouw, Yvonne T.
AU - Moons, Karel G.M.
AU - Boshuizen, Hendriek C.
AU - van der A, Daphne L.
AU - Groenwold, Rolf H.H.
PY - 2013/4/1
Y1 - 2013/4/1
N2 - Purpose: Moderate alcohol consumption is associated with a reduced type 2 diabetes risk, but the biomarkers that explain this relation are unknown. The most commonly used method to estimate the proportion explained by a biomarker is the difference method. However, influence of alcohol-biomarker interaction on its results is unclear. G-estimation method is proposed to accurately assess proportion explained, but how this method compares with the difference method is unknown. Methods: In a case-cohort study of 2498 controls and 919 incident diabetes cases, we estimated the proportion explained by different biomarkers on the relation between alcohol consumption and diabetes using the difference method and sequential G-estimation method. Results: Using the difference method, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol explained the relation between alcohol and diabetes by 78% (95% confidence interval [CI], 41-243), whereas high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (-7.5%; -36.4 to 1.8) or blood pressure (-6.9; -26.3 to -0.6) did not explain the relation. Interaction between alcohol and liver enzymes led to bias in proportion explained with different outcomes for different levels of liver enzymes. G-estimation method showed comparable results, but proportions explained were lower. Conclusions: The relation between alcohol consumption and diabetes may be largely explained by increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol but not by other biomarkers. Ignoring exposure-mediator interactions may result in bias. The difference and G-estimation methods provide similar results.
AB - Purpose: Moderate alcohol consumption is associated with a reduced type 2 diabetes risk, but the biomarkers that explain this relation are unknown. The most commonly used method to estimate the proportion explained by a biomarker is the difference method. However, influence of alcohol-biomarker interaction on its results is unclear. G-estimation method is proposed to accurately assess proportion explained, but how this method compares with the difference method is unknown. Methods: In a case-cohort study of 2498 controls and 919 incident diabetes cases, we estimated the proportion explained by different biomarkers on the relation between alcohol consumption and diabetes using the difference method and sequential G-estimation method. Results: Using the difference method, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol explained the relation between alcohol and diabetes by 78% (95% confidence interval [CI], 41-243), whereas high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (-7.5%; -36.4 to 1.8) or blood pressure (-6.9; -26.3 to -0.6) did not explain the relation. Interaction between alcohol and liver enzymes led to bias in proportion explained with different outcomes for different levels of liver enzymes. G-estimation method showed comparable results, but proportions explained were lower. Conclusions: The relation between alcohol consumption and diabetes may be largely explained by increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol but not by other biomarkers. Ignoring exposure-mediator interactions may result in bias. The difference and G-estimation methods provide similar results.
KW - Alcohol consumption
KW - Biomarkers
KW - Diabetes
KW - Mediation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875378013&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.annepidem.2012.12.014
DO - 10.1016/j.annepidem.2012.12.014
M3 - Article
C2 - 23375342
AN - SCOPUS:84875378013
SN - 1047-2797
VL - 23
SP - 193
EP - 197
JO - Annals of Epidemiology
JF - Annals of Epidemiology
IS - 4
ER -