Estrogen receptor α wields treatment-specific enhancers between morphologically similar endometrial tumors

Marjolein Droog, Ekaterina Nevedomskaya, Gwen M. Dackus, Renske Fles, Yongsoo Kim, Harry Hollema, Marian Mourits, Petra M. Nederlof, Hester H. Van Boven, Sabine C. Linn, Flora E. Van Leeuwen, Lodewyk F.A. Wessels, Wilbert Zwart*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The DNA-binding sites of estrogen receptor α (ERα) show great plasticity under the control of hormones and endocrine therapy. Tamoxifen is a widely applied therapy in breast cancer that affects ERα interactions with coregulators and shifts the DNA-binding signature of ERα upon prolonged exposure in breast cancer. Although tamoxifen inhibits the progression of breast cancer, it increases the risk of endometrial cancer in postmenopausal women. We therefore asked whether the DNA-binding signature of ERα differs between endometrial tumors that arise in the presence or absence of tamoxifen, indicating divergent enhancer activity for tumors that develop in different endocrine milieus. Using ChIP sequencing (ChIP-seq), we compared the ERα profiles of 10 endometrial tumors from tamoxifen users with those of six endometrial tumors from nonusers and integrated these results with the transcriptomic data of 47 endometrial tumors from tamoxifen users and 64 endometrial tumors from nonusers. The ERα-binding sites in tamoxifen-associated endometrial tumors differed from those in the tumors from nonusers and had distinct underlying DNA sequences and divergent enhancer activity as marked by histone 3 containing the acetylated lysine 27 (H3K27ac). Because tamoxifen acts as an agonist in the postmenopausal endometrium, similar to estrogen in the breast, we compared ERα sites in tamoxifen-associated endometrial cancers with publicly available ERα ChIP-seq data in breast tumors and found a striking resemblance in the ERα patterns of the two tissue types. Our study highlights the divergence between endometrial tumors that arise in different hormonal conditions and shows that ERα enhancer use in human cancer differs in the presence of nonphysiological endocrine stimuli.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)E1316-E1325
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume114
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Feb 2017

Cite this