Evaluation and treatment of renal artery stenosis: Impact on blood pressure and renal function

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The conventional non-invasive tests to diagnose renal artery stenosis in a general hypertensive population are not accurate enough for screening purposes. Magnetic resonance angiography might become the new gold standard, with the advantages of the absence of contrast toxicity, good accuracy, and information on flow characteristics. With regard to the treatment of hypertension in patients with renal artery stenosis, intervention is advised only when blood pressure cannot be controlled by at least three antihypertensive drugs. Patency after stenting is superior to angioplasty, although its clinical benefit has not been proved. As for renal function, evidence - although from uncontrolled studies - for the preservation of renal function by intervention is accumulating, especially in those patients with bilateral stenosis or stenosis in a single functioning kidney.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)399-404
Number of pages6
JournalCurrent Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension
Volume10
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 May 2001

Cite this

@article{3f2a47f13ed744ebae3656204fedbb21,
title = "Evaluation and treatment of renal artery stenosis: Impact on blood pressure and renal function",
abstract = "The conventional non-invasive tests to diagnose renal artery stenosis in a general hypertensive population are not accurate enough for screening purposes. Magnetic resonance angiography might become the new gold standard, with the advantages of the absence of contrast toxicity, good accuracy, and information on flow characteristics. With regard to the treatment of hypertension in patients with renal artery stenosis, intervention is advised only when blood pressure cannot be controlled by at least three antihypertensive drugs. Patency after stenting is superior to angioplasty, although its clinical benefit has not been proved. As for renal function, evidence - although from uncontrolled studies - for the preservation of renal function by intervention is accumulating, especially in those patients with bilateral stenosis or stenosis in a single functioning kidney.",
author = "{Van Jaarsveld}, {Brigit C.} and Jaap Deinum",
year = "2001",
month = "5",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1097/00041552-200105000-00016",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "399--404",
journal = "Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension",
issn = "1062-4821",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

Evaluation and treatment of renal artery stenosis : Impact on blood pressure and renal function. / Van Jaarsveld, Brigit C.; Deinum, Jaap.

In: Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension, Vol. 10, No. 3, 21.05.2001, p. 399-404.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation and treatment of renal artery stenosis

T2 - Impact on blood pressure and renal function

AU - Van Jaarsveld, Brigit C.

AU - Deinum, Jaap

PY - 2001/5/21

Y1 - 2001/5/21

N2 - The conventional non-invasive tests to diagnose renal artery stenosis in a general hypertensive population are not accurate enough for screening purposes. Magnetic resonance angiography might become the new gold standard, with the advantages of the absence of contrast toxicity, good accuracy, and information on flow characteristics. With regard to the treatment of hypertension in patients with renal artery stenosis, intervention is advised only when blood pressure cannot be controlled by at least three antihypertensive drugs. Patency after stenting is superior to angioplasty, although its clinical benefit has not been proved. As for renal function, evidence - although from uncontrolled studies - for the preservation of renal function by intervention is accumulating, especially in those patients with bilateral stenosis or stenosis in a single functioning kidney.

AB - The conventional non-invasive tests to diagnose renal artery stenosis in a general hypertensive population are not accurate enough for screening purposes. Magnetic resonance angiography might become the new gold standard, with the advantages of the absence of contrast toxicity, good accuracy, and information on flow characteristics. With regard to the treatment of hypertension in patients with renal artery stenosis, intervention is advised only when blood pressure cannot be controlled by at least three antihypertensive drugs. Patency after stenting is superior to angioplasty, although its clinical benefit has not been proved. As for renal function, evidence - although from uncontrolled studies - for the preservation of renal function by intervention is accumulating, especially in those patients with bilateral stenosis or stenosis in a single functioning kidney.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035003819&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00041552-200105000-00016

DO - 10.1097/00041552-200105000-00016

M3 - Review article

VL - 10

SP - 399

EP - 404

JO - Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension

JF - Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension

SN - 1062-4821

IS - 3

ER -