Examining the construct and known-group validity of a composite endpoint for the Older Persons and Informal Caregivers Survey Minimum Data Set (TOPICS-MDS); A largescale data sharing initiative

Cynthia S. Hofman, Jennifer E. Lutomski, Han Boter, Bianca M. Buurman, Anton J.M. De Craen, Rogier Donders, Marcel G.M.Olde Rikkert, Peter Makai, René J.F. Melis, TOPICS-MDS research consortium, Steering Committee, Working group

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background Preference-weighted multi-faceted endpoints have the potential to facilitate comparative effectiveness research that incorporates patient preferences. The Older Persons and Informal Caregivers Survey Composite endpoint (TOPICS-CEP) is potentially a valuable outcome measure for evaluating interventions in geriatric care as it combines multiple outcomes relevant to older persons in a single metric. The objective of this study was to validate TOPICS-CEP across different study settings (general population, primary care and hospital). Methods Data were extracted from TOPICS Minimum Dataset (MDS), a pooled public-access national database with information on older persons throughout the Netherlands. Data of 17,603 older persons were used. Meta-correlations were performed between TOPICS-CEP indexed scores, EuroQol5-D utility scores and Cantril's ladder life satisfaction scores. Mixed linear regression analyses were performed to compare TOPICS-CEP indexed scores between known groups, e.g. persons with versus without depression. Results In the complete sample and when stratified by study setting TOPICS-CEP and Cantril's ladder were moderately correlated, whereas TOPICS-CEP and EQ-5D were highly correlated. Higher mean TOPICS-CEP scores were found in persons who were: married, lived independently and had an education at university level. Moreover, higher mean TOPICS-CEP scores were found in persons without dementia, depression, and dizziness with falls, respectively. Similar results were found when stratified by subgroup. Conclusion This study supports that TOPICS-CEP is a robust measure which can potentially be used in broad settings to identify the effect of intervention or of prevention in elderly care.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0173081
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume12
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2017

Cite this

Hofman, C. S., Lutomski, J. E., Boter, H., Buurman, B. M., De Craen, A. J. M., Donders, R., ... TOPICS-MDS research consortium, Steering Committee, Working group (2017). Examining the construct and known-group validity of a composite endpoint for the Older Persons and Informal Caregivers Survey Minimum Data Set (TOPICS-MDS); A largescale data sharing initiative. PLoS ONE, 12(3), [e0173081]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173081
Hofman, Cynthia S. ; Lutomski, Jennifer E. ; Boter, Han ; Buurman, Bianca M. ; De Craen, Anton J.M. ; Donders, Rogier ; Rikkert, Marcel G.M.Olde ; Makai, Peter ; Melis, René J.F. ; TOPICS-MDS research consortium, Steering Committee, Working group. / Examining the construct and known-group validity of a composite endpoint for the Older Persons and Informal Caregivers Survey Minimum Data Set (TOPICS-MDS); A largescale data sharing initiative. In: PLoS ONE. 2017 ; Vol. 12, No. 3.
@article{696036d43fd04103a775be265ba098c1,
title = "Examining the construct and known-group validity of a composite endpoint for the Older Persons and Informal Caregivers Survey Minimum Data Set (TOPICS-MDS); A largescale data sharing initiative",
abstract = "Background Preference-weighted multi-faceted endpoints have the potential to facilitate comparative effectiveness research that incorporates patient preferences. The Older Persons and Informal Caregivers Survey Composite endpoint (TOPICS-CEP) is potentially a valuable outcome measure for evaluating interventions in geriatric care as it combines multiple outcomes relevant to older persons in a single metric. The objective of this study was to validate TOPICS-CEP across different study settings (general population, primary care and hospital). Methods Data were extracted from TOPICS Minimum Dataset (MDS), a pooled public-access national database with information on older persons throughout the Netherlands. Data of 17,603 older persons were used. Meta-correlations were performed between TOPICS-CEP indexed scores, EuroQol5-D utility scores and Cantril's ladder life satisfaction scores. Mixed linear regression analyses were performed to compare TOPICS-CEP indexed scores between known groups, e.g. persons with versus without depression. Results In the complete sample and when stratified by study setting TOPICS-CEP and Cantril's ladder were moderately correlated, whereas TOPICS-CEP and EQ-5D were highly correlated. Higher mean TOPICS-CEP scores were found in persons who were: married, lived independently and had an education at university level. Moreover, higher mean TOPICS-CEP scores were found in persons without dementia, depression, and dizziness with falls, respectively. Similar results were found when stratified by subgroup. Conclusion This study supports that TOPICS-CEP is a robust measure which can potentially be used in broad settings to identify the effect of intervention or of prevention in elderly care.",
author = "Hofman, {Cynthia S.} and Lutomski, {Jennifer E.} and Han Boter and Buurman, {Bianca M.} and {De Craen}, {Anton J.M.} and Rogier Donders and Rikkert, {Marcel G.M.Olde} and Peter Makai and Melis, {Ren{\'e} J.F.} and N. Bleijenberg and Blom, {J. W.} and Kempen, {G. I.J.M.} and Krabbe, {P. F.M.} and {Moll Van Charante}, {E. P.} and M. Muntinga and Steyerberg, {E. W.} and J. Gussekloo and {Van Der Horst}, {H. E.} and {Olde Rikkert}, {M. G.M.} and {De Rooij}, {S. E.J.A.} and Schols, {J. M.G.A.} and Schuurmans, {M. J.} and Smilde, {D. A.} and {Van Den Brink}, D. and L. Qin and {TOPICS-MDS research consortium, Steering Committee, Working group}",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0173081",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
journal = "PLoS ONE",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "3",

}

Hofman, CS, Lutomski, JE, Boter, H, Buurman, BM, De Craen, AJM, Donders, R, Rikkert, MGMO, Makai, P, Melis, RJF & TOPICS-MDS research consortium, Steering Committee, Working group 2017, 'Examining the construct and known-group validity of a composite endpoint for the Older Persons and Informal Caregivers Survey Minimum Data Set (TOPICS-MDS); A largescale data sharing initiative' PLoS ONE, vol. 12, no. 3, e0173081. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173081

Examining the construct and known-group validity of a composite endpoint for the Older Persons and Informal Caregivers Survey Minimum Data Set (TOPICS-MDS); A largescale data sharing initiative. / Hofman, Cynthia S.; Lutomski, Jennifer E.; Boter, Han; Buurman, Bianca M.; De Craen, Anton J.M.; Donders, Rogier; Rikkert, Marcel G.M.Olde; Makai, Peter; Melis, René J.F.; TOPICS-MDS research consortium, Steering Committee, Working group.

In: PLoS ONE, Vol. 12, No. 3, e0173081, 01.03.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Examining the construct and known-group validity of a composite endpoint for the Older Persons and Informal Caregivers Survey Minimum Data Set (TOPICS-MDS); A largescale data sharing initiative

AU - Hofman, Cynthia S.

AU - Lutomski, Jennifer E.

AU - Boter, Han

AU - Buurman, Bianca M.

AU - De Craen, Anton J.M.

AU - Donders, Rogier

AU - Rikkert, Marcel G.M.Olde

AU - Makai, Peter

AU - Melis, René J.F.

AU - Bleijenberg, N.

AU - Blom, J. W.

AU - Kempen, G. I.J.M.

AU - Krabbe, P. F.M.

AU - Moll Van Charante, E. P.

AU - Muntinga, M.

AU - Steyerberg, E. W.

AU - Gussekloo, J.

AU - Van Der Horst, H. E.

AU - Olde Rikkert, M. G.M.

AU - De Rooij, S. E.J.A.

AU - Schols, J. M.G.A.

AU - Schuurmans, M. J.

AU - Smilde, D. A.

AU - Van Den Brink, D.

AU - Qin, L.

AU - TOPICS-MDS research consortium, Steering Committee, Working group

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - Background Preference-weighted multi-faceted endpoints have the potential to facilitate comparative effectiveness research that incorporates patient preferences. The Older Persons and Informal Caregivers Survey Composite endpoint (TOPICS-CEP) is potentially a valuable outcome measure for evaluating interventions in geriatric care as it combines multiple outcomes relevant to older persons in a single metric. The objective of this study was to validate TOPICS-CEP across different study settings (general population, primary care and hospital). Methods Data were extracted from TOPICS Minimum Dataset (MDS), a pooled public-access national database with information on older persons throughout the Netherlands. Data of 17,603 older persons were used. Meta-correlations were performed between TOPICS-CEP indexed scores, EuroQol5-D utility scores and Cantril's ladder life satisfaction scores. Mixed linear regression analyses were performed to compare TOPICS-CEP indexed scores between known groups, e.g. persons with versus without depression. Results In the complete sample and when stratified by study setting TOPICS-CEP and Cantril's ladder were moderately correlated, whereas TOPICS-CEP and EQ-5D were highly correlated. Higher mean TOPICS-CEP scores were found in persons who were: married, lived independently and had an education at university level. Moreover, higher mean TOPICS-CEP scores were found in persons without dementia, depression, and dizziness with falls, respectively. Similar results were found when stratified by subgroup. Conclusion This study supports that TOPICS-CEP is a robust measure which can potentially be used in broad settings to identify the effect of intervention or of prevention in elderly care.

AB - Background Preference-weighted multi-faceted endpoints have the potential to facilitate comparative effectiveness research that incorporates patient preferences. The Older Persons and Informal Caregivers Survey Composite endpoint (TOPICS-CEP) is potentially a valuable outcome measure for evaluating interventions in geriatric care as it combines multiple outcomes relevant to older persons in a single metric. The objective of this study was to validate TOPICS-CEP across different study settings (general population, primary care and hospital). Methods Data were extracted from TOPICS Minimum Dataset (MDS), a pooled public-access national database with information on older persons throughout the Netherlands. Data of 17,603 older persons were used. Meta-correlations were performed between TOPICS-CEP indexed scores, EuroQol5-D utility scores and Cantril's ladder life satisfaction scores. Mixed linear regression analyses were performed to compare TOPICS-CEP indexed scores between known groups, e.g. persons with versus without depression. Results In the complete sample and when stratified by study setting TOPICS-CEP and Cantril's ladder were moderately correlated, whereas TOPICS-CEP and EQ-5D were highly correlated. Higher mean TOPICS-CEP scores were found in persons who were: married, lived independently and had an education at university level. Moreover, higher mean TOPICS-CEP scores were found in persons without dementia, depression, and dizziness with falls, respectively. Similar results were found when stratified by subgroup. Conclusion This study supports that TOPICS-CEP is a robust measure which can potentially be used in broad settings to identify the effect of intervention or of prevention in elderly care.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015422629&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0173081

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0173081

M3 - Article

VL - 12

JO - PLoS ONE

JF - PLoS ONE

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 3

M1 - e0173081

ER -