Explaining variance in perceived research misbehavior: results from a survey among academic researchers in Amsterdam

Tamarinde Haven, Joeri Tijdink, Brian Martinson, Lex Bouter, Frans Oort

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review


BACKGROUND: Concerns about research misbehavior in academic science have sparked interest in the factors that may explain research misbehavior. Often three clusters of factors are distinguished: individual factors, climate factors and publication factors. Our research question was: to what extent can individual, climate and publication factors explain the variance in frequently perceived research misbehaviors?

METHODS: From May 2017 until July 2017, we conducted a survey study among academic researchers in Amsterdam. The survey included three measurement instruments that we previously reported individual results of and here we integrate these findings.

RESULTS: One thousand two hundred ninety-eight researchers completed the survey (response rate: 17%). Results showed that individual, climate and publication factors combined explained 34% of variance in perceived frequency of research misbehavior. Individual factors explained 7%, climate factors explained 22% and publication factors 16%.

CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the perceptions of the research climate play a substantial role in explaining variance in research misbehavior. This suggests that efforts to improve departmental norms might have a salutary effect on behavior.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)7
JournalResearch Integrity and Peer Review
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 3 May 2021

Cite this